Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Chinese history and philosophyBiographical and Historical AnalysisKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

P'u-Ku Huai-En 僕固懷恩 and the T'ang Court: The Limits of Loyalty

Peterson, Charles A.·1970·Monumenta Serica

Abstract

The third quarter of the 8th century is indisputably one of the two or three most crucial periods of the entire Tang dynasty, and yet the surface of its political history has scarcely been scratched. This was the period, we may recall, when the powerful state nurtured by Hsuan-tsung ;£ -=f? (712-755) broke down amid severe political divisions, when the An Lu-shan ^ Ufa jli rebellion ran its disastrous course, and when the central government was obliged to address itself to a long and painful task of reconstruction. Probably the dominance of military men throughout this period has acted as something of a deterrent to scholarly interest, for the consequences of brute force appear both too obvious and too little stimulating to the intellect. However, we must most certainly confront these events and these men, one of whom will in fact occupy our attention here. Aside from the general need, there are in addition good specific reasons for taking up the career of the loyalist general P'uku Huai-en eU 13 & JH (?-765). His is a fascinating, poignant story, of undeniable human interest. It is also an important story, closely interwoven with many of the principal events of the time. Not least, it is a story which offers a personal perspective as well as the official one contained in the formal histories, for, quite exceptionally in view of the subject's metier as soldier and his ultimate fate, he has left a long and candid statement of his own. Translated in full below, this document serves not only to express an individual point of view but also as a valuable source on the contemporary situation in general. Finally, and coincidentally, our subject stands out as an apparently typical product of that marginal frontier zone which, according to the well-known thesis of Professor Owen Lattimore, has played such a vital role in Chinese history.1

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02549948.1970.11744998

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, C. A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Charles A.
Venue
Monumenta Serica
Published
1970-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
423-455
ISSN
  • 0254-9948 (ISSN-L)
  • 2057-1690
OpenAlex
W2466549062
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Monumenta Serica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Keywords
Tang dynasty, An Lushan Rebellion, loyalty, generals, borderlands, Owen Lattimore, 8th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P'u-Ku Huai-En 僕固懷恩 and the T'ang Court: The Limits of Loyalty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02549948.1970.11744998
The paper
Peterson, C. A. (1970). P'u-Ku Huai-En 僕固懷恩 and the T'ang Court: The Limits of Loyalty. Monumenta Serica. https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.1970.11744998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.