CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Cultural and Mythological StudiesChinese history and philosophyFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Das Bild Der Ratte Im Alten China

Peintinger, Franz Xaver·2001·Monumenta Serica
DOI 10.1080/02549948.2001.11731366
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

中國古代文化的鼠中國文化中關於老鼠的文章可分為四部分。本篇首先談語源學和生物 學中關於老鼠的介紹，最古老的當屬在舊、新石器時代的化石、甲骨 。其次見於商、周和漢代文物，後來在宋、明、清繪畫中也表現同類 的内容。再來是，十二生肖中是研究鼠文化很重要的一部分，它表現 在陶瓷俑、石俑、木俑、銅俑，墓誌飾紋及銅鏡中等等。最後是老鼠 對於人類的貢獻，例如在民間美術中有關老鼠娶親的圖繪，牡鼠是中 醫重要的一味及鼠肉為飲食文化中的一道珍饈。

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02549948.2001.11731366

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rat heads the list of twelve creatures in the Chinese Zodiac and is often praised for its extraordinary reproductive capacity.

    “Yet, the rat heads the list of twelve creatures in the Chinese Zodiac, and it is often praised for its extraordinary reproductive capacity (see, for instance, Peintinger 2001, pp.393, 406; Idema 2019, pp.31-34).”

    From What about Rats? Buddhist Disciplinary Guidelines on Rats: Daoxuan’s Vinaya Commentaries (2021) · cites this paper as Peintinger 2001, pp.393, 406

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Anli 除安利 Chen, 1988, WB, 2, 41
  2. Xiandan 陈显丹 Chen, 1993, WT, 2, 8
  3. 1993, Museum fü;r Kunst und Kulturgeschichte der Stadt Dortmund
  4. Xiaoneng Yang, 1999, Celebrated Discoveries from the People's Republic of China
  5. Fuxing 邓福星 Deng, 1993, 剪紙卷, Zhongguo minjian meishu quanji 中国民间美術全集, Bd., 10
  6. Jian Li, 1998, 7.3. – 7.6.1998 u.a.
  7. Fontein, Jan et al., Oriental Ceramics. The World's Great Collections, Vol. 10:Museum of Fine Arts Boston, Tokyo u.a. 1980.
  8. Ho Judy Chungwa, 1991, Papers on Chinese Ceramic Funerary Sculptures, 60
  9. Songcun 簡松村 Jian, 1984, GWY 11, 2, 76
  10. Yuxiang 江玉祥 Jiang, 1992, MT, 1, 38
  11. Karlgren Bernhard, 1966, Repr.
  12. 1987, Ten 金龍。金馬動物国宝展
  13. Kuo Gloria L.H. 郭良蔥, 1988, dieselbe, Qinghua qing 青花膏, 339
  14. Lü;Ders Heinrich, 1933, Sitzungsbericht der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaft der Philosophischen-historischen Klasse, 998
  15. Changyi 耳昌文 Ma, 1994, WT, 6, 23
  16. Michio 松丸道雄 Matsumaru, 1995, Kōkotsu moji jishaku sōran 甲骨文字字釋綜覽
  17. Zi 木子 Mu, ZWB Nr., 6, 3
  18. Nott Stanley Charles, 1974, A Review ofits Characteristics, Decoration, Folklore, and Symbolism
  19. Read Bernard E., 1976, Reprint from Peking Natural History Bulletin, 5, 37
  20. Schafer 1977: Schafer, Edward H.”3: T'ang”, in: Chang, K.C. (ed.),Food in Chinese Culture. Anthropological and Historical Perspectives[New Haven, London 1977] Taipei o.J.
  21. 1958, Shaanxisheng chutu Tang yong xuanji 陕西省出土唐俑选集
  22. Sotheby's, 1993, Chinese and Japanese Ceramics and Works of Art
  23. Sotheby's, 1999, 11 May 1999, Sale AM0729
  24. Strätz Volker, 1996, MS, 44, 213
  25. Bai 宿白 Su, 1989, Zhongguo meishu quanji 中國美術全集
  26. Tan-Chiung 譚旦冏 T'an, 1980, Zhonghua congshu 中華叢書(Collected Papers on History and Art of China), Bd., 3
  27. The Quest for Etemity—Chinese Ceramic Sculptures from the People's Republic of China, Susan L. Caroselli (ed.), Akat.: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, San Francisco 1987.
  28. Theile Albert, 1955, Die Kunst des fernen Ostens: China—Korea—Japan, Teil VI–VIII
  29. Changyi 謝昌 Xie, 1996, GWY, 155, 112
  30. Chengxia 謝成俠 Xie, 1996, NK, 1, 225
  31. Mingliang 謝明良 Xie, 1986, GXJ, 3, 59
  32. Hui 余輝 Yu, 1996, WT, 2, 13
  33. Jiabao 曾嘉寶 Zeng, 1996, GWY, 158, 102
  34. Yan 郑岩 Zheng, 1992, WT, 5, 24
  35. 1966, Xi'an jiaoqu Sui Tang mu 西安郊区隋唐墓
  36. Zhongguo, 1980, Mancheng Han mu fajue baogao 滿城汉墓发掘报告, 2 Bde.
  37. 1984, Zhongguo bowuguan congshu 中国博物馆丛书, Bd., 5
  38. Jifa 莊吉發 Zhuang, 1996, GWY, 155, 70
  39. Hanzhong 左汉屮 Zuo, 1994, Hunan minjian meishu quanji 湖南民间美术全集

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Peintinger, F. X.
Corresponding author
Peintinger, Franz Xaver
Venue
Monumenta Serica
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2001-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
391-443
ISSN
  • 0254-9948 (ISSN-L)
  • 2057-1690
DOI
10.1080/02549948.2001.11731366
OpenAlex
W2343680565
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Monumenta Serica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Keywords
ancient Chinese culture, oracle bone inscriptions, twelve zodiac animals, terracotta figurines, bronze mirrors, tombstone decoration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review