The evolution of "trusteeship" in Kenya
Abstract
(1972). The Evolution of “Trusteeship” in Kenya. South African Historical Journal: Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 64-80.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both Du Bois and Bryce were wrong that race was the critical problem of the twentieth century.
“Both Du Bois and Bryce were wrong.Race was not the critical problem of the twentieth century, even if it was an underlying reality.”
From Britain's Declining Empire: The Road to Decolonisation, 1918–1968 (2007) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Britain's Declining Empire: The Road to Decolonisation, 1918–1968
Hyam, R. (2007) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802898 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
- Authors
- BRADLOW, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- BRADLOW, EDNA
- Venue
- South African Historical Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-80
- ISSN
- 0258-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1726-1686
- OpenAlex
- W2042025992
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- South African Historical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
- Keywords
- trusteeship, Kenya, decolonization, British colonial rule, colonial administration, post-independence transition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
