Cited by 1,134Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative research in healthCross-Cultural and Social Analysis

Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures

Merriam, Sharan B., Johnson-Bailey, Juanita, Lee, Ming-Yeh, Kee, Youngwha, Ntseane, Gabo, Muhamad, Mazanah·2001·International Journal of Lifelong Education

Abstract

Early discussions of insider/outsider status assumed that the researcher was predominately an insider or an outsider and that each status carried with it certain advantages and disadvantages. More recent discussions have unveiled the complexity inherent in either status and have acknowledged that the boundaries between the two positions are not all that clearly delineated. Four case studies - a Black woman interviewing other Black women, Asian graduate students in the US interviewing people from ‘back home’, an African professor learning from African businesswomen, and a cross-cultural team studying aging in a nonWestern culture - are used as the data base to explore the complexities of researching within and across cultures. Positionality, power, and representation proved to be useful concepts for exploring insider/outsider dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02601370120490

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our identities are not fixed, but rather fluid and shifting, and therefore resist easy categorization.

    “Other researchers, particularly those working within critical, feminist, and postmodernist approaches, argue that our identities are not fixed, but rather fluid and shifting, and therefore resist easy categorization (Merriam et al., 2001).”

    From Adults researching with children (2023) · cites this paper as Merriam et al., 2001

  • Researchers are positioned on a continuum and are always, to some degree, both inside and outside.

    “We are positioned on a continuum and are always, to some degree, both inside and outside (Merriam et al., 2001; Ochieng, 2010).”

    From Adults researching with children (2023) · cites this paper as Merriam et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M.
Venue
International Journal of Lifelong Education
Published
2001-09
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
405-416
ISSN
  • 0260-1370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-519X
OpenAlex
W2085234352
Cited by
1,134
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Lifelong Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Keywords
insider and outsider, researcher positionality, power in research, cross-cultural research, representation, Black women researchers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review