Cited by 1,075Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and EngagementEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Students’ engagement in first‐year university

Krause, Kerri‐Lee, Coates, Hamish·2008·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

This paper reports on seven calibrated scales of student engagement emerging from a large‐scale study of first year undergraduate students in Australian universities. The analysis presents insights into contemporary undergraduate student engagement, including online, self‐managed, peer and student‐staff engagement. The results point to the imperative for developing a broader understanding of engagement as a process with several dimensions. These must be acknowledged in any measurement and monitoring of this construct in higher education. The paper calls for a more robust theorising of the engagement concept that encompasses both quantitative and qualitative measures. It considers implications for pedagogy and institutional policy in support of enhancing the quality of the student experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602930701698892

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, K., & Coates, H.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Australian Council for Educational Research (AU)
Corresponding author
Krause, Kerri‐Lee
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2008-09-12
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
493-505
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W1980247690
Cited by
1,075
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 39
FWCI
91.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
student engagement, first-year students, online engagement, self-directed learning, peer engagement, student experience, university teaching, institutional policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review