Students’ engagement in first‐year university
Abstract
This paper reports on seven calibrated scales of student engagement emerging from a large‐scale study of first year undergraduate students in Australian universities. The analysis presents insights into contemporary undergraduate student engagement, including online, self‐managed, peer and student‐staff engagement. The results point to the imperative for developing a broader understanding of engagement as a process with several dimensions. These must be acknowledged in any measurement and monitoring of this construct in higher education. The paper calls for a more robust theorising of the engagement concept that encompasses both quantitative and qualitative measures. It considers implications for pedagogy and institutional policy in support of enhancing the quality of the student experience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student engagement at university is significantly influenced by sense of belonging.
“Student engagement at university is significantly influenced by sense of belonging.”
From Building a sense of belonging among tertiary commuter students: The Monash Non-Residential Colleges program (2017) · cites this paper as Krause & Coates, 2008
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such collaborative activity is reflected in contemporary anthropological theories of situated or distributed learning which suggest that individuals learn by involving themselves in fields or communities of practice or inquiry (Hutchins, 1995; Lave & Wenger, 1991).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 · Cited by 1,097 · see citing works
“Therefore, calls have been made for a greater understanding of the role that educational technology plays in affecting student engagement, in order to strengthen teaching practice and lead to improved outcomes for students (Castañeda & Selwyn, 2018; Krause & Coates, 2008; Nelson Laird & Kuh, 2005).”
BackgroundAn Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education
(2018) · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning
Xu, B., Chen, N.-S., & Chen, G. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and Psychometric Evidence
Zhoc, K. C. H., Webster, B. J., King, R. B., Li, J. C. H., & Chung, T. S. H. (2019) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Theorising student engagement in higher education
Kahn, P. E. (2014) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3121 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Engagement in digital interventions.
Nahum-Shani, I., Shaw, S. D., Carpenter, S. M., Murphy, S. A., & Yoon, C. (2022) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000983 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
van der Meer, J., Jansen, E., & Torenbeek, M. (2010) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070903383211 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Student engagement in neo-liberal times: what is missing?
Zepke, N. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Teachers' Commitment and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Work Engagement and Well-Being
Shu, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850204 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Manu, B. D., Ying, F., Oduro, D., & Boateng, S. A. (2021) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100100 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Learning dashboards at scale: Early warning and overall first year experience
Broos, T., Pinxten, M., Delporte, M., Verbert, K., & De Laet, T. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689546 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Fernandes, A., Ford, A., Rayner, G., & Pretorius, L. (2017) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.v8i2.380 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Al-Sakkaf, A., Omar, M., & Ahmad, M. (2019) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2018.1564611 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Owusu-Agyeman, Y., & Mugume, T. (2023) · Tertiary Education and Management · doi:10.1007/s11233-023-09120-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Analysis of classroom silence behaviors among Chinese and Korean undergraduates
Zhang, J., Fang, Z., & Rhee, G. S. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1674145 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krause, K., & Coates, H.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Australian Council for Educational Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Krause, Kerri‐Lee
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-09-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 493-505
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W1980247690
- Cited by
- 1,075
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 91.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- student engagement, first-year students, online engagement, self-directed learning, peer engagement, student experience, university teaching, institutional policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review