Cited by 467Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEducational Research and MethodsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application

Open access
Olaf Zawacki‐Richter, Michael Kerres, Svenja Bedenlier, Melissa Bond, Katja Buntins·2020·Springer eBooks

Abstract

In this open access edited volume, international researchers of the field describe and discuss the systematic review method in its application to research in education. Alongside fundamental methodical considerations, reflections and practice examples are included and provide an introduction and overview on systematic reviews in education research.; Open Access With contributions from international experts First volume with a special focus on systematic reviews in educational research Contains practical examples Takes ethical considerations into account.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7

Cites

202 of 202 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zawacki‐Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2020
OpenAlex
W4255215277
Cited by
467
References
202
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 14
FWCI
3.63
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Funded by Editor
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
systematic reviews, educational research, evidence synthesis, evidence-based education, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review