Assessing practical laboratory skills in undergraduate molecular biology courses
Abstract
This study explored a new strategy of assessing laboratory skills in a molecular biology course to improve: student effort in preparation for and participation in laboratory work; valid evaluation of learning outcomes; and students’ employment prospects through provision of evidence of their skills. Previously, assessment was based on written laboratory reports and examinations, not on the demonstration of practical skills per se. This action research project involved altering the assessment design so that a greater proportion of the marks was allocated to active participation and learning in the laboratory, partially replacing a single examination with direct observation of student participation and learning over a prolonged period of weekly laboratory sessions. We ascertained staff and students’ perceptions of the new assessment processes by means of a Likert scale questionnaire, student focus group and individual staff interviews. Overall, students and staff evaluated the new assessment structure positively, citing fairness, authenticity and reward for effort. Results also revealed the need for specific training of staff in this form of assessment and indicated staff–student ratios made assessment burdensome. Four out of five students reported that an increased awareness of the importance of practical laboratory skills stimulated them to greater efforts to achieve.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional written laboratory reports can be tedious and time-consuming for a relatively low mark percentage.
“Traditional written laboratory reports can be tedious and timeconsuming for a relatively low mark percentage (Drumm et al., 2024;Hunt et al., 2012).”
From Replacing Traditional Written Laboratory Reports with Interactive Oral Assessments: Enhancing Laboratory Skill Assessment in Undergraduate Genetics Education (2026) · cites this paper as Hunt et al., 2012
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · see citing works
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drumm, B. T., Bree, R., Griffin, C. S., & O’Leary, N. (2024) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00257.2023 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Della Vedova, C. B., Birbeck, D., & Davey, S. K. (2026) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-026-10380-3
- Authors
- Hunt, L., Koenders, A., & Gynnild, V.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Koenders, Annette
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 861-874
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2044456319
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
- University of Southern Queensland
- Edith Cowan University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- assessment design, molecular biology education, undergraduate laboratory course, laboratory reports, student effort, employee perceptions, student perceptions, assessment fairness, staff-student ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review