Cited by 77Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Effects of personalised feedback approach on knowledge building, emotions, co-regulated behavioural patterns and cognitive load in online collaborative learning

Zheng, Lanqin, Zhong, Lu, Niu, Jiayu·2022·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

Learning analytics has been widely used in the field of education. Most studies have adopted a learning analytics dashboard to present data on learning processes or learning outcomes. However, only presenting learning analytics results was not sufficient and lacked personalised feedback. In response to these gaps, this study proposed a learning analytics-based personalised feedback approach and examined the effects of the proposed approach on collaborative knowledge building, emotional status, co-regulated behavioural patterns and cognitive load. The learning analytics-based personalised feedback approach adopted a deep neural network model, namely Bert (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers), to automatically classify discussion transcripts in online collaborative learning. In total, 60 undergraduate students participated in this exploratory study and were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The students in the experimental group learned with the learning analytics-based personalised feedback approach, and the students in the control group learned with the traditional online collaborative learning approach. The learning analytics-based approach was found to have significant impacts and no significant difference in cognitive load was noted between the experimental and control groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602938.2021.1883549

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, L., Zhong, L., & Niu, J.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Lanqin
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2021-02-17
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
109-125
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W3130473949
Cited by
75
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61907003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
personalized feedback, learning analytics, online collaborative learning, knowledge construction, emotions, cognitive load, BERT, deep neural network, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review