Cited by 12Student Assessment and FeedbackHigher Education Practises and EngagementProblem and Project Based Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course

Open access
Colson, Natalie, Shuker, Mary-Ann, Maddock, Louise·2022·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

Creativity is an important twenty-first century skill often overlooked in higher education curricula, particularly in the sciences. Students need opportunities to practice and demonstrate their creativity and gain an awareness of the importance of such skills to enhance their graduate capabilities. One way is to embed creativity into course assessment and link it to an employability context. This article describes how we used a staff-student co-creation framework to develop a group project assessment task encouraging 400+ first-year online students to express their creativity and demonstrate graduate attributes. We were also interested in students’ perspectives of empowerment, collegiality and authenticity. Our findings indicate the task enabled student groups to generate a diverse array of creative educational products for varied audiences. Most students valued the opportunity to express their creativity and were able to see the connection with creativity and other soft skills along with future opportunities and achievements. The group work aspects of the task helped many students feel connected to their peers and in control of their assessment. Students perceived that this assessment task reflected multiple aspects of authenticity. We demonstrate co-created creative assessment can be undertaken in large first year science classes to facilitate student learning and capability development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602938.2021.2011133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1080/03075070802644911 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/02602930600679050 · DOI
  3. Bowden J., 2000, Generic Capabilities of ATN University Graduates
  4. 10.1080/03075079312331382448 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/07294360802444347 · DOI
  6. Cook-Sather A., 2014, Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty
  7. Creswell J. W., 2018, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
  8. Creswell J. W., 2007, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
  9. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/0729436042000235454 · DOI
  15. Gray A., 2016, World Economic Forum
  16. Haselberger D., 2012, Education and Culture DG Lifelong Learning Programme, European Union. Version, 1, 1
  17. 10.4324/9780203016503 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/14703297.2015.1088396 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/14703290802175966 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/10632910903455884 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/02602938.2014.982072 · DOI
  23. 10.11120/bmhe.2014.00008 · DOI
  24. Mezirow J., 2012, The Handbook of Transformative Learning, 73
  25. 10.1080/07294360.2018.1446415 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Rampersad G., 2014, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15, 1
  28. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1492700 · DOI
  29. Ryan A., 2013, Flexible Pedagogies: New Pedagogical Ideas
  30. 10.1080/07294360.2019.1664998 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/13562517.2018.1515195 · DOI
  33. World Economic Forum, 2015, New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potential of Technology
  34. Yorke M., 2006, Employability in Higher Education: What It is-What It is Not. Vol. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Colson, N., Shuker, M.-A., & Maddock, L.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Colson, Natalie
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2021-12-10
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
1149-1166
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W4200435955
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
creativity, co-creation, assessment design, genetics education, graduate competencies, employability, online learning, student empowerment, authenticity, soft skills, large classes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02602938.2021.2011133
The paper
Colson, N., Shuker, M.-A., & Maddock, L. (2022). Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2011133