Cited by 30Art Therapy and Mental HealthTheatre and Performance StudiesDiversity and Impact of Dance

Dramatherapy: Five Core Processes

Jones, Phil·1991·Dramatherapy

Abstract

This article aims to identify key processes within dramatherapy from a theatrical perspective. I have chosen five key areas to examine: each of the following will be discussed and summarised; 1. Dramatic Projection 2. The Therapeutic Performance process 3. Dramatherapeutic empathy and distancing 4. Representation, Personification and Impersonation 5. The Interactive Audience and Witnessing in Dramatherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02630672.1991.9689804

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 30

Authors
Jones, P.
Corresponding author
Jones, Phil
Venue
Dramatherapy
Publisher
Intellect
Published
1991-10
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
8-15
ISSN
  • 0263-0672 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-1430
OpenAlex
W2162843478
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dramatherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Diversity and Impact of Dance
Keywords
therapeutic performance, representation, personification, impersonation, witnessing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review