Examining talk moves of science teacher’s through communicative approach
Abstract
Background Teachers are expected to take actions that support students’ ideas and create a network of ideas between different ideas when classroom discourse is based on an interactive dialogic communicative approach. Despite this emphasis, it is unknown how well existing discourse approaches and moves used in science education research correspond with the discourse cultures that teachers currently engage in.Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify the teacher’s talk moves during the whole class discussion, how the teacher decides the moves, and the communicative approach used in tandem with the talk moves. Sample A fifth-grade science teacher working in a primary school in Turkey and her students were the participants of the study.Design and methods A case study was used to understand how the teacher’s talk moves laid the groundwork for the communicative approach, how she transitioned from one approach to another, and the reasons for this transition.Results The dialogue begins with the teacher’s move of laying the foundation. The teacher allows students to express their ideas on this basis and synthesizes the different ideas of the students. It can be inferred that the teacher considers the limitations of the Science program when determining the content to be taught and therefore adopts an authoritative approach. Although an environment in which students can express their ideas freely was established in an effort to create a pool of ideas, student interaction was obse…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective teacher moves foster deeper engagement and disciplinary understanding.
“Prior studies have shown that effective teacher moves foster deeper engagement and disciplinary understanding (e.g., Bansal 2018; Yıldız-Feyzioğlu and Türksever-Güleç 2024).”
From Metadiscourse and Teacher Moves for Supporting Student Reasoning in Linguistics Classroom Interactions (2026) · cites this paper as Yıldız-Feyzioğlu and Türksever-Güleç 2024
Cites
Developing the theory of formative assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 · Cited by 3,301 · see citing works
Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Soysal, Y. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00266-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, J., & Hu, W. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12793 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yıldız-Feyzioğlu, E., & Türksever-Güleç, C.
- Affiliations
- Aydın Adnan Menderes University
- Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
- Venue
- Research in Science & Technological Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-05-24
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 856-881
- ISSN
- 0263-5143 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1138
- OpenAlex
- W4398781235
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Science & Technological Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- talk moves, classroom discourse, science teachers, whole-class discussion, continuing teacher education, fifth grade science, elementary school science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review