Cited by 9Science Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEducational Research and Methods

Middle School Science Teachers’ Discursive Purposes and Talk Moves in Supporting Students’ Experiments

Soysal, Yilmaz·2022·Science & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11191-021-00266-3

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soysal, Y.
Venue
Science & Education
Published
2021-08-29
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
739-785
ISSN
  • 0926-7220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1901
OpenAlex
W3198233858
Cited by
9
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
middle school science teaching, student experiments, scientific inquiry, research question formulation, confounding variables, experimental replication, data reliability, verbal scaffolding, teacher noticing, classroom discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review