The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validity and reliability of GPS for measuring instantaneous velocity during acceleration, deceleration, and constant motion
Abstract
In this study, we assessed the validity and reliability of 5 and 10 Hz global positioning systems (GPS) for measuring instantaneous velocity during acceleration, deceleration, and constant velocity while straight-line running. Three participants performed 80 running trials while wearing two GPS units each (5 Hz, V2.0 and 10 Hz, V4.0; MinimaxX, Catapult Innovations, Scoresby, VIC, Australia). The criterion measure used to assess GPS validity was instantaneous velocity recorded using a tripod-mounted laser. Validity was established using the standard error of the estimate (± 90% confidence limits). Reliability was determined using typical error (± 90% confidence limits, expressed as coefficient of variation) and Pearson's correlation. The 10 Hz GPS devices were two to three times more accurate than the 5 Hz devices when compared with a criterion value for instantaneous velocity during tasks completed at a range of velocities (coefficient of variation 3.1-11.3%). Similarly, the 10 Hz GPS units were up to six-fold more reliable for measuring instantaneous velocity than the 5 Hz units (coefficient of variation 1.9-6.0%). Newer GPS may provide an acceptable tool for the measurement of constant velocity, acceleration, and deceleration during straight-line running and have sufficient sensitivity for detecting changes in performance in team sport. However, researchers must account for the inherent match-to-match variation reported when using these devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anderson, L., Orme, P., Di Michele, R., Close, G. L., Morgans, R., Drust, B., & Morton, J. P. (2016) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1106574 · Cited by 211
Gastin, P. B., Hunkin, S. L., Fahrner, B., & Robertson, S. (2019) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003023 · Cited by 82
Loveday, A., Sherar, L. B., Sanders, J. P., Sanderson, P. W., & Esliger, D. W. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4761 · Cited by 70
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Chapman, P., Naughton, G., & Farhart, P. (2015) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0062 · Cited by 69
Training and competition workloads and fatigue responses of elite junior cricket players.
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Naughton, G., Farhart, P., & Chapman, P. (2013) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.5.517 · Cited by 42
Skalska, M., Nikolaidis, P. T., Knechtle, B., Rosemann, T. J., Radzimiński, Ł., Jastrzębska, J., Kaczmarczyk, M., Myśliwiec, A., Dragos, P., López-Sánchez, G. F., et al. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11020349 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Varley, M. C., Fairweather, I. H., & Aughey, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-127
- ISSN
- 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-447X
- OpenAlex
- W1987923327
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.