The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting coin flips: using resampling and hierarchical models to help untangle the NHL’s shoot-out
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Perhaps one reason that the NFL shows the most consistency over time is that, in general, it is the worst at drafting newly eligible players (see Lopez (2016) for comparisons in the drafting ability of each league).”
From How often does the best team win? A unified approach to understanding randomness in North American sport (2018) · cites this paper as Lopez (2016)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050 · cited 1×
“We follow Gelman (2006) in using an inverse χ2 for the prior distribution of our precision parameters, the τ’s.”
MethodReproducible research in computational science
Peng, R. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1213847 · Cited by 1,449 · cited 1×
“Finally, given that per-shot data are missing in easily analysable format, as well as the increased awareness regarding the importance of reproducible scientific research (Peng, 2011), we provide all of our data and code so that future researchers can confirm our results while performing their own analyses.”
BackgroundFunnel plots for comparing institutional performance
Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2005) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1970 · Cited by 832
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/aer.100.5.2548 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1198/000313002317572790 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02640410701744446 · DOI
- 10.1137/1.9780898718386.ch25 · doi:10.1137/1.9780898718386.ch25
- Hurley W. J., 2008, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 7, 10.22237/jmasm/1209615960 · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1209615960
- 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.002 · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.002
- 10.1080/02640410802509144 · DOI
- 10.1080/02640410600624020 · DOI · Paper page
- Leeds M., 2004, The economics of sports
- 10.1177/1527002513486654 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.03.007 · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.03.007
- 10.1080/02640410050074331 · doi:10.1080/02640410050074331
- 10.1111/1467-9884.00108 · DOI
- R Core Team, 2015, R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]
- 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258 · DOI
- 10.1080/02640414.2015.1012103 · DOI
Cited by
Benefits of higher resistance-training volume are related to ribosome biogenesis
Hammarström, D., Øfsteng, S., Koll, L., Hanestadhaugen, M., Hollan, I., Apró, W., Whist, J. E., Blomstrand, E., Rønnestad, B. R., & Ellefsen, S. (2020) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp278455 · Cited by 99
Lopez, M. J., Matthews, G. J., & Baumer, B. S. (2018) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/18-aoas1165 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez, M. J., & Schuckers, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Mathematics, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA
- Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 888-897
- ISSN
- 0264-0414
- 1466-447X
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting coin flips: using resampling and hierarchical models to help untangle the NHL’s shoot-out. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02640414.2016.1198046
- The paper
- Lopez, M. J., & Schuckers, M. (2017). Predicting coin flips: using resampling and hierarchical models to help untangle the NHL’s shoot-out. Journal of Sports Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1198046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
