Cited by 50Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsSport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

The Effects of REBT on Irrational Beliefs, Self-Determined Motivation, and Self-Efficacy in American Football

Open access
Chrysidis, Spyridon, Turner, Martin J., Wood, Andrew G.·2020·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

It has been suggested in recent research that rational beliefs as conceptualized within rational-emotive behaviour therapy (REBT) can be operationalized as strategic self-talk, but this has yet to be meaningfully investigated. The current study examines the effects of five one-to-one REBT sessions with three amateur American Football athletes to foster rational self-talk. The purpose of the intervention was to reduce the irrational beliefs, but also in line with recent applied REBT research, to increase the self-determined motivation and self-efficacy of the athletes. Using an idiographic single-case, staggered multiple-baseline across participants design, visual analyses revealed meaningful increases in self-determined motivation and self-efficacy, adjunct to decreases in total irrational beliefs across all participants. Social validation data supported these outcomes. These findings add to the growing research indicating that REBT can influence motivational approaches in athletes, such as self-determined motivation and self-efficacy. Results are discussed in relation to processes underlying the mechanisms of change, while also reporting the limitations of the study. The robustness of the research design increases the extent to which target variable changes can be attributed to REBT, but critical reflections are undertaken to assess the veracity of the findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2020.1776924

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chrysidis provided empirical evidence that the REBT framework could help college football athletes develop intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy.

    “Chrysidis provided empirical evidence that this framework could help college football athletes develop intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy [148].”

    From SAFEvR MentalVeRse.app: Development of a Free Immersive Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia and Claustrophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [148]

    The Discussion reports that self-efficacy and self-determined motivation improved after REBT in three American football athletes. The Participants section identifies them as amateur players competing in Germany, not as college athletes. The Measures section says the analysis used an index of self-determined motivation; it does not establish a separate improvement in intrinsic motivation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Baker, J., Horton, S., Robertson-Wilson, J., & Wall, M. (2003). Nurturing sport expertise: factors influencing the development of elite athlete. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2(1), 1.
  2. Dryden, W. (2012). Cognitive behaviour therapies. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
  3. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  4. Turner, M. J., Wood, A. G., Barker, J. B., & Chadha, N. (2019). Rational self-talk: A Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) perspective. In A. T. Latinjak, and A. Hatzigeorgiadis (Ed.) Self-talk in sport. Routledge.
  5. Warren, J. M. (2010). The impact of rational emotive behavior therapy on teacher efficacy and student achievement. Journal of School Counseling, 8(11).
  6. Zinsser, N., Bunker, L., & Williams, J. M. (2010). Cognitive techniques for building confidence and enhancing performance. Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance (pp. 305-335) McGraw-Hill New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chrysidis, S., Turner, M. J., & Wood, A. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Turner, Martin J.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2020-06-16
Volume
38
Issue
19
Pages
2215-2224
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W3034491676
Cited by
50
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
rational emotive behavior therapy, irrational beliefs, autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, rational belief, sport psychology intervention, recreational athletes
MeSH terms
Football, Humans, Male, Motivation, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Self Efficacy, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review