The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating psychological and physical assessments to obtain optimal return-to-sport outcomes after ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The selected time window (3-12 months post-ACLR) reflects a critical period in rehabilitation where patients are commonly assessed for return-to-activity decisions.
“The selected time window (3–12 months post-ACLR) reflects a critical period in rehabilitation where patients are commonly assessed for return-to-activity decisions.”
From Biopsychosocial profiles following ACL reconstruction: A latent class analysis of barriers to return-to-activity (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
The Study limitations section says most included studies focused on a 12-month return-to-sport criterion, and the study summaries describe an assessment at 6 months that predicted return at one year. This supports assessments during part of the proposed window, but the paper does not establish 3–12 months as a critical period in which patients are commonly assessed for return-to-activity decisions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898 · Cited by 34,787
Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect
Higgins, J. P., Li, T., & Deeks, J. J. (2019) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9781119536604.ch6 · Cited by 977 · cited 2×
“Sequentially removing one study at a time from the analysis of 12 journal articles allowed us to determine whether the study conclusions and rankings remained consistent (J. P. T. Higgins et al., 2019).”
Fixed-effect versus random-effects models
(2009) · Introduction to Meta‐Analysis · doi:10.1002/9780470743386.ch13 · Cited by 247
Application of network meta-analysis in the field of physical activity and health promotion
Su, X., McDonough, D. J., Chu, H., Quan, M., & Gao, Z. (2020) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.011 · Cited by 38
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1177/0363546513489284 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0363546514563282 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.recot.2021.07.006 · DOI
- 10.2519/jospt.2024.12483 · DOI
- 10.1177/1941738119869333 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/03635465231192983 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40279-022-01747-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12178-017-9420-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119536604.ch10 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12434 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671231159408 · DOI
- 10.1177/2325967118797575 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546521991924 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40634-022-00545-0 · DOI
- 10.3390/jcm13154498 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.033 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119536604.ch23 · DOI
- 10.7326/M14-2385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0028086 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103141 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-019-05774-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.knee.2024.10.013 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12178-024-09934-7 · DOI
- Lasserson, T. J., Thomas, J., & Higgins, J. P. (2019). Undertaking network meta-analyses. In Julian P.T. Higgins, James Thomas, Jacqueline Chandler, Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li, Matthew J. Page, Vivian A. Welch. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed. pp. 285–320). Wiley.
- 10.3390/healthcare11202787 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.25110 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphys.2022.1046141 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-014-3261-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/19417381241256930 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546519887952 · DOI
- 10.26603/001c.123479 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.016 · DOI
- 10.1002/jrsm.1373 · DOI
- 10.1177/2325967118787159 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119536604.ch13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1941738117745806 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4085/1062-6050-0608.21 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0307720 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671231154540 · DOI
- 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007371 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001687 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671231195030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.038 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671241239325 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671221093985 · DOI
- 10.1177/2325967120969425 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40279-019-01093-x · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546518773757 · DOI
- 10.4085/1062-6050-328-16 · DOI
- 10.1177/19417381231155120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/19417381231223522 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petushek, E., Harkey, M. S., Santiago, K., Stamm, A., Baez, S., Diekfuss, J. A., Myer, G. D., & Kuenze, C. (2025) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.08.004 · Cited by 5
Murphy, T., Lyons, L., Mertz-Bynum, N., Lugin, A., Harkey, M. S., Kuenze, C., Baez, S., Myer, G. D., Diekfuss, J., & Petushek, E. (2026) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0696.25
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo, C.-S., Chen, K.-C., Shih, J.-C., Cheng, B., & Chao, W.-C.
- Affiliations
- Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
- Australian Catholic University
- National Chung Hsing University
- ORCID
- Chao, Wei-Cheng
- Venue
- Journal of Sports Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-07-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2404-2417
- ISSN
- 0264-0414
- 1466-447X
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (Grant No. CSH-2021-C-035)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
