Cited by 38Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPhysical Activity and HealthDelphi Technique in Research

Application of network meta-analysis in the field of physical activity and health promotion

Open access
Su, Xiwen, McDonough, Daniel J., Chu, Haitao, Quan, Minghui, Gao, Zan·2020·Journal of Sport and Health Science

Abstract

Continued advancement in the field of physical activity and health promotion relies heavily on the synthesis of rigorous scientific evidence. As such, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have led to a better understanding of which intervention strategies are superior (i.e., produce the greatest effects) in physical activity-based health behavior change interventions. Indeed, standard meta-analytic approaches have allowed researchers in the field to synthesize relevant experimental evidence using pairwise procedures that produce reliable estimates of the homogeneity, magnitude, and potential biases in the observed effects. However, pairwise meta-analytic procedures are only capable to discerning differences in effects between a select intervention strategy and a select comparison or control condition. In order to maximize the impact of physical activity interventions on health-related outcomes, it is necessary to establish evidence concerning the comparative efficacy of all relevant physical activity intervention strategies. The development of network meta-analysis (NMA)-most commonly used in medical-based clinical trials-has allowed for the quantification of indirect comparisons, even in the absence of direct, head-to-head trials. Thus, it stands to reason that NMA can be applied in physical activity and health promotion research to identify the best intervention strategies. Given that this analysis technique is novel and largely unexplored in the field of physical activity and health promotion, care must be taken in its application to ensure reliable estimates and discernment of the effect sizes among interventions. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to comment on the potential application and importance of NMA in the field of physical activity and health promotion, describe how to properly and effectively apply this technique, and suggest important considerations for its appropriate application in this field. In this paper, overviews of the foundations of NMA and commonly used approaches for conducting NMA are provided, followed by assumptions related to NMA, opportunities and challenges in NMA, and a step-by-step example of developing and conducting an NMA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.011

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Network meta-analysis outperforms conventional pairwise meta-analysis by integrating and quantifying both direct and indirect evidence, estimating the relative effectiveness of multiple interventions simultaneously, and ranking treatments.

    “Network meta-analysis, a promising synthesis methodology in the field of sports science and health promotion, outperforms conventional pairwise meta-analysis by integrating and quantifying both direct and indirect evidence, estimating the relative effectiveness of multiple interventions simultaneously, and ranking treatments as part of the process of clinical decision-making [26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, X., McDonough, D. J., Chu, H., Quan, M., & Gao, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Zan
Venue
Journal of Sport and Health Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
511-520
ISSN
  • 2213-2961 (ISSN-L)
  • 2095-2546
OpenAlex
W3046449231
Cited by
38
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
network meta-analysis, physical activity interventions, health promotion, health behavior change, indirect comparison, intervention efficacy, randomized controlled trials, methodological assumptions, evidence synthesis
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Network Meta-Analysis As Topic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Health Promotion, Humans, Research Design, Software, Exercise, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review