The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Quantitative Description of Action Disorganisation after Brain Damage: A Case Study
Abstract
This paper outlines a theoretical approach to the study of action in simple, routine activities, along with a coding system for describing and analysing performance. The approach is exemplified through a single case study involving a patient who developed a profound action disorder following rupture of a pericallosal artery aneurysm and concomitant anterior cerebral artery spasm. The Action Coding System provides a detailed, quantitative picture of this patient's action disorder as it was manifested in two routine tasks and as it recovered over time. Discussion focuses on the cognitive organisation and processing of simple, everyday tasks and suggests how disruption of performance may ensue when intentional control of action is compromised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
Shallice, T. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526817 · Cited by 4,072
Categorization of action slips
Norman, D. A. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.1.1 · Cited by 1,736
Cited by
Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues.
CHAN, R., SHUM, D., TOULOPOULOU, T., & CHEN, E. (2008) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010 · Cited by 1,401
Event perception: a mind-brain perspective
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273 · Cited by 1,148
In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?
Land, M. F., & Hayhoe, M. (2001) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00102-x · Cited by 960
The ecological validity of tests of executive function
BURGESS, P. W., ALDERMAN, N., EVANS, J., EMSLIE, H., & WILSON, B. A. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617798466037 · Cited by 932
Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life
Land, M. F. (2006) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.01.002 · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, M. F., Reed, E. S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N. H.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 381-414
- ISSN
- 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0627
- OpenAlex
- W2123092720
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quantitative Description of Action Disorganisation after Brain Damage: A Case Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02643299108253379
- The paper
- Schwartz, M. F., Reed, E. S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N. H. (1991). The Quantitative Description of Action Disorganisation after Brain Damage: A Case Study. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299108253379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
