Cited by 667Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life

Open access
Land, Michael F.·2006·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research

Abstract

The patterns of eye movement that accompany static activities such as reading have been studied since the early 1900s, but it is only since head-mounted eye trackers became available in the 1980s that it has been possible to study active tasks such as walking, driving, playing ball games and ordinary everyday activities like food preparation. This review examines the ways that vision contributes to the organization of such activities, and in particular how eye movements are used to locate the information needed by the motor system in the execution of each act. Major conclusions are that the eyes are proactive, typically seeking out the information required in the second before each act commences, although occasional 'look ahead' fixations are made to establish the locations of objects for use further into the future. Gaze often moves on before the last act is complete, indicating the presence of an information buffer. Each task has a characteristic but flexible pattern of eye movements that accompanies it, and this pattern is similar between individuals. The eyes rarely visit objects that are irrelevant to the action, and the conspicuity of objects (in terms of low-level image statistics) is much less important than their role in the task. Gaze control may involve movements of eyes, head and trunk, and these are coordinated in a way that allows for both flexibility of movement and stability of gaze. During the learning of a new activity, the eyes first provide feedback on the motor performance, but as this is perfected they provide feed-forward direction, seeking out the next object to be acted upon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.01.002

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Land, M. F.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Land, Michael F.
Venue
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
296-324
ISSN
1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000617596
Cited by
667
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 37
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
eye movements, gaze control, everyday activities, motor control, motor learning, cooking, driving, walking
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Eye Movements, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review