Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 535

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis

Gonzalez Rothi, Leslie J., Ochipa, Cynthia, Heilman, Kenneth M.·1991·Cognitive Neuropsychology

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the development of a composite model of limb praxis processing that is supported by a series of dissociations noted in the performance of apraxic patients. These dissociations include die separability of praxis production from praxis reception, the selectivity of input modalities, an “assembled” route of praxis imitation, and the possible fragmentation of semantics into an action and a nonaction system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02643299108253382

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 535

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., Ochipa, C., & Heilman, K. M.
Venue
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Published
1991-11
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
443-458
ISSN
  • 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0627
OpenAlex
W2138687386
Cited by
535
References
0
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02643299108253382
The paper
Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., Ochipa, C., & Heilman, K. M. (1991). A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299108253382

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.