Cited by 366Child Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Child maltreatment and insecure attachment: a meta‐analysis

Baer, Judith C., Martinez, Colleen Daly·2006·Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Abstract

The validity of the insecure/disorganized attachment pattern has been clearly established in over 80 studies with more than 100 samples. However, given that child maltreatment is considered one of the most important causes of insecure/disorganized attachment, it is notable that few studies have been published specifically examining the maltreatment/insecure attachment hypothesis. The purpose of this paper was to review the research findings and conduct a meta‐analysis to examine the effect size of maltreatment and insecure attachment across studies. A second goal was to conduct a subpopulation analysis to investigate effect size by type of maltreatment. Following a literature search which yielded 25 articles, we identified eight studies (n = 791) that: (a) consisted of children who experienced different types of maltreatment including cases of malnutrition and failure‐to‐thrive, (b) consisted of children under 48 months of age, (c) used the Strange Situation or a modification of it to measure attachment, (d) had comparison groups, and (e) contained sufficient detail to conduct a meta‐analysis. Results showed that the maltreated infants were significantly more likely to have an insecure attachment than the controls. A subpopulation analysis by type of abuse was conducted. Overall the findings support the maltreatment/insecure attachment hypothesis. The subpopulation analysis, although extremely small, indicates that different types of maltreatment affect the magnitude of the e…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02646830600821231

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Ainsworth M. D. S., 1969, Determinants of infant behavior, 113
  2. Ainsworth M. D. S., 1978, Patterns of attachment
  3. Barnett D., 1993, Child abuse, child development, and social policy, 7
  4. 10.1017/S095457940000585X · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00004583-199702000-00020 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/02646838808403554 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0954579400004569 · DOI
  8. Carlson E. A., 1998, Child Development, 69, 1107, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06163.x · DOI
  9. Chisholm K., 1998, Child Development, 69, 1092, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06162.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cordero A. E., 2004, Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85, 571, 10.1606/1044-3894.1840 · DOI
  11. Crittenden P. M., 1988, Clinical implications of attachment theory, 136
  12. 10.1017/S0954579400000110 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511665707.015 · DOI
  14. Egeland B., 1981, Developmental perspectives in child maltreatment, 77
  15. 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60988-2 · DOI
  16. Garbarno J., 1997, Understanding abusive families: An ecological approach to theory and practice, 101
  17. Hart S. N., 1996, The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment, 72
  18. 10.1111/1467-7687.00045 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0163-6383(85)80015-1 · DOI
  20. Lieberman A. F., 1985, New directions in failure to thrive: implications for research and practice, 259, 10.1007/978-1-4684-5095-8_17 · DOI
  21. Main M., 1990, Attachment in the preschool years, 161
  22. Main M., 1986, Affective development in infancy, 95
  23. Main M., 1985, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 50 (1–2) 6
  24. 10.2307/1130852 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S0954579499002035 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.2307/1131368 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/1097-0355(199323)14:3<208::AID-IMHJ2280140306>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/1097-0355(200011/12)21:6<428::AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  29. 10.1080/14616730310001659566 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–275 of 275

Metadata

Authors
Baer, J. C., & Martinez, C. D.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Baer, Judith C.
Venue
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Published
2006-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
187-197
ISSN
  • 0264-6838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-672X
OpenAlex
W2159313975
Cited by
366
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child abuse, insecure attachment, disorganized attachment, infant attachment, Strange Situation Procedure, malnutrition, failure to thrive, early childhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review