Living in two worlds’: a qualitative analysis of first-time mothers’ experiences of maternal ambivalence
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this qualitative study was to examine experiences and meanings of maternal ambivalence in first-time mothers with young children. BACKGROUND: In contrast with normative expectations surrounding contemporary motherhood, there is growing recognition that becoming and being a mother involves ambivalent feelings, and that these feelings are normal and have positive psychological consequences. Yet, little attention has been paid to women's subjective experiences of maternal ambivalence, and capacity to acknowledge and manage ambivalent feelings. METHODS: Eleven semi-structured online interviews, with first-time mothers, were conducted and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) methodology. RESULTS: Two group experiential themes were identified: Crossing boundaries of acceptable mothering feelings and Mothering from a place of 'enough'. Ambivalent mothering feelings challenged participants' expectations about motherhood and themselves as mothers, producing anxiety, self-doubt and feelings of failure. Distress accompanying maternal ambivalence was especially acute when participants perceived their feelings to be unacceptable. Viewing conflicting feelings with compassion, however, helped participants to cope with their diverse and fluctuating emotional mothering experiences, allowing them to mother with a greater sense of equanimity, agency and competence. CONCLUSION: The study's findings indicate the potential benefits of providing information about the emotional turbulence of early motherhood as part of routine maternity care, as well as the potential value of offering parenting interventions that promote self-compassion to mothers struggling to manage feelings of ambivalence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a robust and growing international qualitative literature on maternal subjectivities, predominantly focused on Global North contexts.
“While there is a robust and growing international qualitative literature on maternal subjectivities (predominantly focused on Global North contexts) (27–29), there is a considerably lower amount that draws on qualitative longitudinal research (QLR), a significant gap given the highly dynamic nature of maternal subjectivities over time.”
Cites
Shame, guilt, and depressive symptoms: A meta-analytic review.
Kim, S., Thibodeau, R., & Jorgensen, R. S. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021466 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Self-compassion and well-being in parents of children with autism
Neff, K. D., & Faso, D. J. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0359-2 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Shame-proneness, guilt-proneness and anxiety symptoms: A meta-analysis
Cândea, D.-M., & Szentagotai-Tătar, A. (2018) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.005 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Women’s experiences of postnatal distress: a qualitative study
Coates, R., Ayers, S., & de Visser, R. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-359 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Parenting self-compassion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jefferson, F. A., Shires, A., & McAloon, J. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01401-x · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Interventions that promote self-compassion have been shown to reduce self-criticism, as well as depression, anxiety and parenting stress (Jefferson et al., 2020).”
Monteiro, F., Fonseca, A., Pereira, M., Alves, S., & Canavarro, M. C. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.124 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These findings are in line with previous research demonstrating that self-compassion and an accepting stance towards negative emotions are important protective factors for mothers’ mental health (Felder et al., 2016; Monteiro et al., 2019).”
Shame and guilt in the postnatal period: A systematic review
Caldwell, J., Meredith, P., Whittingham, K., & Ziviani, J. (2021) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646838.2020.1754372 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Common Negative Thoughts in Early Motherhood and Their Relationship to Guilt, Shame and Depression
Law, N. K., Hall, P. L., & Cheshire, A. (2021) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-021-01968-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torres, N. F., Watson, D., Mohlomi, L., Hlungwani, T., Gardiner, C. V., Muller-Kluits, N., Norris, S. A., Draper, C. E., & Pentecost, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Global Women's Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1880613
- Authors
- Raneberg, A., & MacCallum, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Raneberg, Agne
- Venue
- Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-05-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 934-948
- ISSN
- 0264-6838 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-672X
- OpenAlex
- W4375949302
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- maternal ambivalence, primiparous women, early motherhood, maternal emotions, self-compassion, maternal anxiety, self-doubt, parenting support, obstetric care
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Parenting, Qualitative Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review