Cited by 22Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Allergenicity and allergens of amphipods found in nori (dried laver)

Motoyama, Kanna, Hamada, Yuki, Nagashima, Yuji, Shiomi, Kazuo·2007·Food Additives and Contaminants

Abstract

Gammaridean and caprellid amphipods, crustaceans of the order Amphipoda, inhabit laver culture platforms and, hence, are occasionally found in nori (dried laver) sheets. Amphipods mixed in nori may cause allergic reactions in sensitized patients, as is the case with other crustaceans, such as shrimp and crab, members of the order Decapoda. In this study, dried samples of amphipods (unidentified) found in nori and fresh samples of gammaridean amphipod (Gammarus sp., not accurately identified) and caprellid amphipod (Caprella equilibra) were examined for allergenicity and allergens using two species of decapods (black tiger prawn and spiny lobster) as references. When analyzed by ELISA, sera from crustacean-allergic patients reacted to extracts from amphipod samples, although less potently than to the extracts from decapods. In IgE-immunoblotting, a 37-kDa protein was found to be the major allergen in amphipods. Based on the molecular mass and the cross-reactivity with decapod tropomyosin evidenced by inhibition ELISA and inhibition immunoblotting, the 37-kDa protein was identified as amphipod tropomyosin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02652030701305454

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies evaluating allergenicity of nori sheets identified amphipod-derived tropomyosin as the principal allergen; however, detected levels were minimal, suggesting hypersensitivity reactions following ingestion would be uncommon.

    “For instance, studies evaluating the allergenicity of nori sheets identified amphipod-derived tropomyosin as the principal allergen; however, detected levels were minimal, suggesting that hypersensitivity reactions following ingestion would be uncommon [252].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motoyama, K., Hamada, Y., Nagashima, Y., & Shiomi, K.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology (JP)
  • Nagasaki University (JP)
Corresponding author
Shiomi, Kazuo
Venue
Food Additives and Contaminants
Published
2007-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
917-922
ISSN
0265-203X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989255539
Cited by
22
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
Amphipoda, nori, dried laver, food allergens, crustacean allergy, Gammarus, Caprella equilibra, tropomyosin, allergenicity, cross-reactivity, black tiger prawn, spiny lobster, IgE immunoblotting, inhibition ELISA
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Cross Reactions, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Food Contamination, Food Hypersensitivity, Hot Temperature, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Tropomyosin, Immunoblotting, Amphipoda, Palinuridae, Penaeidae, Porphyra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review