The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dietary arsenic intakes in the United States: FDA Total Diet Study, September 1991-December 1996
Abstract
The FDA has conducted the Total Dietary Study (TDS), a yearly market basket programme, since 1961. It is designed to monitor the levels of toxic chemical contaminants (pesticide residues, industrial and elemental contaminants) and essential nutrients in the US food supply. It also provides information on trends in dietary concentrations and exposures for the general population. Foods are collected from retail stores once a year from each of four geographic areas of the US and are analysed either after preparation/cooking or as ready-to-eat. The latest TDS (1991-1997) data show that arsenic (inorganic and organic, > or = 0.03 ppm) was found in 63 (24%) of the 261-264 foods/mixed dishes analysed. The highest concentration was found in seafood, followed by rice/rice cereal, mushrooms, and poultry. Based on the United States Department of Agriculture's 1987-1988 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey, the estimated daily total arsenic average intakes, in microgram/day, are: 2 for infants, 23 for toddlers, 20 for 6-year-old children, 13 for 10-year-old children, 15 for 14-16-year-old boys, 21 for 14-16-year-old girls, 57 for 25-30-year-old men, 28 for 25-30-year-old women, 47 for 40-45-year-old men, 37 for 40-45-year-old women, 92 for 60-65-year-old men, 72 for 60-65-year-old women, 69 for 70-year-old men, and 42 for 70-year-old women. Of the estimated total arsenic intakes for infants, 42% arise from seafood and 31% from rice/rice cereals. Of the estimated total arsenic intakes, seafood contributes 76-90% for children (2-10-year olds), 79-85% for 14-16-year olds, and 89-96% for adults (> or = 25-30-year olds); rice/rice cereals contributes 4-8% for children, 8% for 14-16-year olds, and 1-4% for adults (> or = 25-30-year olds).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meharg, A. A., & Rahman, M. M. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0259842 · Cited by 1,018
The role of metallobiology and amyloid-β peptides in Alzheimer's disease
Roberts, B. R., Ryan, T. M., Bush, A. I., Masters, C. L., & Duce, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07500.x · Cited by 266
Yang, Y.-W., Liou, S.-H., Hsueh, Y.-M., Lyu, W.-S., Liu, C.-S., Liu, H.-J., Chung, M.-C., Hung, P.-H., & Chung, C.-J. (2018) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2018.07.015 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Tao, S. S.-H., & Michael Bolger, P.
- Venue
- Food Additives and Contaminants
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 465-472
- ISSN
- 0265-203X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091154154
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary arsenic intakes in the United States: FDA Total Diet Study, September 1991-December 1996. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/026520399283759
- The paper
- Tao, S. S.-H., & Michael Bolger, P. (1999). Dietary arsenic intakes in the United States: FDA Total Diet Study, September 1991-December 1996. Food Additives and Contaminants. https://doi.org/10.1080/026520399283759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.