Cited by 23Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsOcular and Laser Science ResearchUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

SAR thresholds for electromagnetic exposure using functional thermal dose limits

Open access
Adibzadeh, Fatemeh, Paulides, Margarethus M., van Rhoon, Gerard C.·2018·International Journal of Hyperthermia

Abstract

Background and purpose: To protect against any potential adverse effects to human health from localised exposure to radio frequency (100 kHz–3 GHz) electromagnetic fields (RF EMF), international health organisations have defined basic restrictions on specific absorption rate (SAR) in tissues. These exposure restrictions incorporate safety factors which are generally conservative so that exposures that exceed the basic restrictions are not necessarily harmful. The magnitude of safety margin for various exposure scenarios is unknown. This shortcoming becomes more critical for medical applications where the safety guidelines are required to be relaxed. The purpose of this study was to quantify the magnitude of the safety factor included in the current basic restrictions for various exposure scenarios under localised exposure to RF EMF.Materials and methods: For each exposure scenario, we used the lowest thermal dose (TD) required to induce acute local tissue damage reported in literature, calculated the corresponding TD-functional SAR limits (SARTDFL) and related these limits to the existing basic restrictions, thereby estimating the respective safety factor.Results: The margin of safety factor in the current basic restrictions on 10 g peak spatial average SAR (psSAR10g) for muscle is large and can reach up to 31.2.Conclusions: Our analysis provides clear instructions for calculation of SARTDFL and consequently quantification of the incorporated safety factor in the current basic restrictions. This research can form the basis for further discussion on establishing the guidelines dedicated to a specific exposure scenario, i.e. exposure-specific SAR limits, rather than the current generic guidelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02656736.2018.1424945

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 1 Main image: Modelled hotspot-mimicking a spherical target inside a tissue at 37(  C). Inset images: Induction of temperatures up to T thresh at centre of the sphere, and the corresponding SARTDFL.
Figure 1 Main image: Modelled hotspot-mimicking a spherical target inside a tissue at 37(  C). Inset images: Induction of temperatures up to T thresh at centre of the sphere, and the corresponding SARTDFL.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Impact of target diameter on the SARTDFL in muscle using various databases for thermal tissue properties. The SARTDFL values were calculated for exposure duration of 60 min.
Figure 3 Impact of target diameter on the SARTDFL in muscle using various databases for thermal tissue properties. The SARTDFL values were calculated for exposure duration of 60 min.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 4 Impact of exposure duration on the SARTDFL after 60, 30, 15 and 5 min exposure in targets of 20, 5, 1 and 0.5 cm diameter in muscle. The results are calculated for only basal (McIntosh) and thermoregulated (Erasmus MC) perfusions, considering 10 min delay in thermoregulatory process of tissue, i.e. there is no thermoregulated perfusion for exposure duration < 10 min.
Figure 4 Impact of exposure duration on the SARTDFL after 60, 30, 15 and 5 min exposure in targets of 20, 5, 1 and 0.5 cm diameter in muscle. The results are calculated for only basal (McIntosh) and thermoregulated (Erasmus MC) perfusions, considering 10 min delay in thermoregulatory process of tissue, i.e. there is no thermoregulated perfusion for exposure duration < 10 min.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 5 Instructions to calculate SAR TDFL limit. The outputs are SARTDFL limits derived using basal or thermoregulated tissue properties.
Figure 5 Instructions to calculate SAR TDFL limit. The outputs are SARTDFL limits derived using basal or thermoregulated tissue properties.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. ICNIRP, 1998, Health Phys, 74, 494
  2. IEEE (2005). Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, Std C95.1.
  3. 10.3109/02656736.2015.1110757 · DOI
  4. 10.3109/02656736.2015.1108462 · DOI
  5. 10.3109/02656736.2015.1129440 · DOI
  6. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/995 · DOI
  7. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/488 · DOI
  8. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC., 2010, International standard, Medical equipment IEC 60601-2-33: particular requirements for the safety of Magnetic resonance equipment
  9. 10.1007/s00330-013-2825-y · DOI
  10. 10.1002/mrm.24671 · DOI
  11. 10.1142/S1793048010001184 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04144-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/10.784145 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.035 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90379-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/02656730500271668 · DOI
  17. 10.3109/02656736.2015.1114153 · DOI
  18. 10.1152/jappl.1948.1.2.93 · DOI
  19. 10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002 · DOI
  20. 10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/003 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb50739.x · DOI
  22. 10.1088/0031-9155/56/23/008 · DOI
  23. Chou CK, 1983, Electromagnetic heating for therapy
  24. 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/012 · DOI
  25. 10.3109/02656739509022453 · DOI
  26. 10.3109/02656739609023525 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TBME.1984.325364 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90343-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90236-W · DOI
  30. 10.1080/0265673031000119006 · DOI
  31. Yarmolenko PS, 2011, Int J Hyperthermia, 26, 1
  32. Drizdal T, 2010, Radioengineering, 19, 281
  33. 10.1002/mrm.24690 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/s13014-015-0510-9 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.04.010 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s00421-006-0331-5 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/s13014-016-0588-8 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/bem.21885 · DOI
  39. 10.3109/02656736.2013.822993 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Adibzadeh, F., Paulides, M. M., & van Rhoon, G. C.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Adibzadeh, Fatemeh
Venue
International Journal of Hyperthermia
Published
2018-01-18
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1248-1254
ISSN
  • 0265-6736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5157
OpenAlex
W2791851543
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Journal of Hyperthermia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
specific absorption rate, radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, thermal dose, safety factor, basic restrictions, tissue heating, muscle tissue
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Temperature, Cats, Dogs, Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Swine, Magnetic Field Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SAR thresholds for electromagnetic exposure using functional thermal dose limits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02656736.2018.1424945
The paper
Adibzadeh, F., Paulides, M. M., & van Rhoon, G. C. (2018). SAR thresholds for electromagnetic exposure using functional thermal dose limits. International Journal of Hyperthermia. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2018.1424945