The usefulness of Schwartz‘s ‘values theory’ in understanding consumer behaviour towards differentiated products
Abstract
The Values Theory adopts a generic framework whereby a set of values is employed across consumer decision-making contexts in a manner that makes no distinction among various product categories. The present study advances this theory by exhibiting the adaptation capability of the generic values instrument (the Portrait Value Questionnaire, PVQ), demonstrating that tailor-made PVQ versions can reflect consumers' motives towards differentiated products (i.e. organic foods). A questionnaire was completed by approximately 1000 households in each of eight EU countries (N = 8171). The organic food-relevant PVQ was developed through a preliminary qualitative phase (i.e. a means-end chain analysis), and its factorial design was validated through CFA, showing high statistical performance. PVQ-based European clusters with strong self-transcendence values comprised large numbers of organic purchasers. Moreover, results point to the fact that when a circumplex taxonomy, such as the PVQ, is applied in a real context (i.e. organic food purchases), the situation-relevant value domains merge into new hierarchical dimensions in absolute respect of the original taxonomy. This conclusion points to PVQ's robustness in adaptability to different situations of human value perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between universal values and domain-specific decision-making or behavior is complicated and mostly weak.
“However, the relationship between universal values and domainspecific decision-making or behavior is complicated and mostly weak (Cieciuch, 2017;Krystallis, Vassallo, & Chryssohoidis, 2012).”
From Relationships between functional food consumption and individual traits and values: A segmentation approach (2021) · cites this paper as Krystallis et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Krystallis, A., Vassallo, M., & Chryssohoidis, G.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Krystallis, Athanasios
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 1438-1463
- ISSN
- 0267-257X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1376
- OpenAlex
- W2019101372
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Management (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cognitive and psychological constructs research
- Keywords
- Portrait Values Questionnaire, consumer values, organic food consumption, differentiated products, self-transcendence values, means-end chain analysis, purchase decision, cross-cultural comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review