Relationships between functional food consumption and individual traits and values: A segmentation approach
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to identify, describe, and compare consumer segments based on food- and health-related values and traits and how the segments are related to functional food consumption. A hybrid hierarchical k-means clustering approach was used to identify homogeneous consumer segments based on food innovativeness, food self-control, hedonic eating values, convenience orientation, health importance, and weight management concern. Based on a representative sample in Norway, three consumer segments were identified: the careless, the self-controlled, and the convenience-oriented. The careless were uninterested in food and health matters and did not appreciate novelty or variation in their food choices. The self-controlled were the most receptive to novelty and food innovation and highly engaged in health matters. The convenience-oriented were the most inclined to consume functional foods, had a pronounced convenience orientation, and were concerned about weight gain. How the industry needs to adapt its marketing strategy across consumer segments are discussed.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study uses a person-centered segmentation approach to identify Norwegian consumer segments based on food-related traits and values, then profiles them by functional food attitudes, intentions, and consumption. It finds three segments—careless, self-controlled, and convenience-oriented—with the convenience-oriented segment most positive toward and most likely to consume functional foods.
Key findings
- Three segments emerged: “careless” (34.8%, n = 282), “self-controlled” (24.0%, n = 194), and “convenience-oriented” (41.2%, n = 334).
- The convenience-oriented segment had the strongest positive attitude toward functional foods (M = 5.23, SD = 1.32) versus careless (M = 4.50, SD = 1.23) and self-controlled (M = 4.59, SD = 1.61); it also had the strongest intention (M = 4.53, SD = 1.43) versus self-controlled (M = 3.92, SD = 1.85) and careless (M = 3.80, SD = 1.26), and the highest consumption frequency (M = 3.11, SD = 1.65).
- Significant segment differences were reported for attitude, F(2,807) = 25.90, p < .001; intention, F(2,807) = 20.72, p < .001; and consumption, F(2,807) = 6.36, p = .002.
- The self-controlled segment consumed vegetables and fruit/berries most frequently and sweets/snack foods and ready-made foods least frequently; the careless segment consumed vegetables least frequently and energy/vitamin drinks most frequently. Socio-demographically, the careless segment was mostly men (61.7%) with lower education (51.2%), the convenience-oriented segment was typically women (59.0%) with higher education (54.2%), and the self-controlled segment was mostly older (53.6% aged 50–74) with higher education (62.9%).
Methods
- A nationally representative sample of 810 Norwegian adults aged 18–74 was surveyed online in January 2019 via computer-assisted web interviewing; respondents were randomly selected from YouGov’s pre-recruited panel.
- Segmentation bases were domain-specific traits and values: food innovativeness, food self-control, hedonic eating value, convenience orientation, health importance, and weight management concern. A PCA initially yielded seven components; after item omissions, six components explained 78% of total variance, and the 20 retained items were used as clustering inputs rather than factor scores.
- A hybrid hierarchical k-means clustering approach was applied: Ward’s method with Euclidean distance identified cluster centers, followed by k-means clustering. A three-cluster solution was retained based on 30 validation indices and majority rule. One-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc tests and chi-square tests were used for profiling.
Limitations
- The paper states that the study focused on functional foods as a broad category, not specific products, and was conducted in a single country (Norway); future research should include specific functional food products, test segment stability, and validate findings across countries.
- The paper states that other segmentation bases could be useful, including food safety, food naturalness, health-claim credibility, functional food knowledge, social norms, broader personality traits, universal values, and self-determination theory perspectives.
- Evident from the text: the design is cross-sectional and based on self-reported attitudes, intentions, and consumption frequencies, so the study describes associations between segments and outcomes rather than testing causal trait/value–attitude–behavior pathways.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 100 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
The study's findings provide empirical evidence that being convenience oriented, concerned about weight gain, and having a low level of self-control is characteristic of consumers with a higher propensity to consume functional food.
“provide empirical evidence suggesting that the combination of being convenience oriented, concerned about weight gain, and having a low level of self-control is characteristic of consumers with a higher propensity to consume functional food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The study's findings support that health and hedonism (or sensory appeal) rank as top priorities in consumers' minds.
“Findings support the general notion that health and hedonism (or sensory appeal) rank as top priorities in consumers' minds (for a review, see Cunha, Cabral, Moura, & de Almeida, 2018) and provide empirical evidence suggesting that the combination of being convenience oriented, concerned about weight gain,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cunha et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The second and smallest segment (24.0% of the sample) had the highest scores on food innovativeness.
“The second and smallest segment (24.0% of the sample) presented high levels of food self-control and had the highest scores on the variables measuring food innovativeness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Significant differences were observed across segments for intention to consume functional foods (F(2,807) = 20.72, p < .001).
“intention to consume functional foods (F(2,807) = 20.72,p < .001),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The second and smallest segment (24.0% of the sample) had high levels of food self-control.
“The second and smallest segment (24.0% of the sample) presented high levels of food self-control and had the highest scores on the variables measuring food innovativeness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The careless and self-controlled segments did not differ in their attitude toward functional foods.
“Consumers in the latter two segments did not differ in their attitude toward and intention to consume functional foods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The convenience-oriented consumer typically has higher education (54.2%).
“The convenience-oriented consumer is typically a woman (59.0%) with higher education (54.2%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most self-controlled consumers are older (53.6% aged 50-74).
“Most consumers are older (53.6% are aged 50-74) with higher education (62.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The six principal components explained 78% of the total variance.
“These explained 78% of the total variance (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The careless segment is mostly men (61.7%).
“The careless segment consists of 282 consumers-mostly men (61.7%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Health importance and hedonic eating values had the highest overall mean values across the three consumer segments.
“Health importance and hedonic eating values were the two most important values across segments (i.e., they exhibited the highest overall mean values).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Convenience-oriented consumers had a stronger intention to consume functional foods (M = 4.53, SD = 1.43) than self-controlled (M = 3.92, SD = 1.85) and careless (M = 3.80, SD = 1.26) consumers.
“The convenience-oriented consumers also presented a stronger intention to consume functional foods (M = 4.53, SD = 1.43) compared with the self-controlled (M = 3.92, SD = 1.85) and the careless (M = 3.80, SD = 1.26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the three segments, the careless consumed vegetables least frequently.
“Among the consumers in the three segments, the careless consumed vegetables the least frequently and energy and vitamin drinks the most frequently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most self-controlled consumers have higher education (62.9%).
“Most consumers are older (53.6% are aged 50-74) with higher education (62.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most careless consumers have a lower education level (51.2%).
“Most careless consumers have a lower education level (51.2%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The self-controlled segment consumed vegetables and fruits and berries most frequently compared with the other two segments.
“The self-controlled consumed vegetables and fruits and berries the most frequently-and sweets and snack foods and ready-made foods the least frequently-compared with the other two segments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The convenience-oriented consumers reported the highest consumption frequency of sweets and snack foods.
“The convenience-oriented consumers reported the highest consumption frequency of meat as a basis for dinner and of sweets and snack foods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences between segments were observed on region.
“No significant differences between segments were observed on the sociodemographic variables region and number of children living at home.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Convenience-oriented consumers reported the highest consumption frequency of functional foods (M = 3.11, SD = 1.65).
“Finally, the convenience-oriented consumers also reported the highest consumption frequency of functional foods (M = 3.11, SD = 1.65).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The careless segment was fairly convenience oriented.
“The careless consumer was also fairly convenience oriented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The convenience-oriented consumers reported the highest consumption frequency of meat as a basis for dinner.
“The convenience-oriented consumers reported the highest consumption frequency of meat as a basis for dinner and of sweets and snack foods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The careless segment had significantly lower food innovativeness scores than the other two segments.
“They were the least innovative-or most conservative-with respect to foods, with significantly lower scores on variables measuring food innovativeness compared with consumers in the two other segments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Significant differences were observed across segments for attitudes toward the consumption of functional foods (F(2,807) = 25.90, p < .001).
“Significant differences were observed both for attitudes toward the consumption of functional foods (F(2,807) = 25.90, p < .001),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Consumers in segment 1 (the careless; 34.8% of the sample) had a mean score below the sample mean or near the scale midpoint for all segmentation variables.
“For all the segmentation variables, consumers in segment 1 (34.8% of the sample), whom we call the “careless,” exhibited a mean score below the sample mean or near the scale midpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The convenience-oriented consumer is typically a woman (59.0%).
“The convenience-oriented consumer is typically a woman (59.0%) with higher education (54.2%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The levels of self-control regarding food were the clearest difference between the self-controlled (high levels) and the convenience-oriented (low levels).
“The levels of (the trait) self-control regarding food were the clearest difference between the self-controlled (high levels) and the convenience-oriented (low levels).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The third segment exhibited particularly low levels of self-control about food.
“Additionally, this segment exhibited particularly low levels of self-control about food.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The third and largest segment (41.2% of the sample) was characterized by weight management concern.
“The third and largest segment (41.2% of the sample) was characterized by a strong convenience orientation and weight management concern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Food innovativeness best distinguishes between the careless and the self-controlled.
“Food innovativeness (a trait) best distinguishes between the careless and the self-controlled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The segments differed significantly in the consumption of most foods, including vegetables, fruit and berries, sweets and snack foods, and ready-made foods.
“The segments differed significantly in the consumption of most foods, including vegetables, fruit and berries, sweets and snack foods, and ready-made foods (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Convenience-oriented consumers had a significantly stronger positive attitude toward functional foods (M = 5.23, SD = 1.32) than careless (M = 4.50, SD = 1.23) and self-controlled (M = 4.59, SD = 1.61) consumers.
“The convenience-oriented consumers exhibited a significantly stronger positive attitude toward the consumption of functional foods (M = 5.23, SD = 1.32) compared with the careless (M = 4.50, SD = 1.23) and the self-controlled (M = 4.59, SD = 1.61).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The careless and self-controlled segments did not differ in their intention to consume functional foods.
“Consumers in the latter two segments did not differ in their attitude toward and intention to consume functional foods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The levels of hedonic eating values discriminated most between the convenience-oriented (high levels) and the careless (low levels).
“The levels of hedonic eating values discriminated the most between the convenienceoriented (high levels) and the careless (low levels).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the three segments, the careless consumed energy and vitamin drinks most frequently.
“Among the consumers in the three segments, the careless consumed vegetables the least frequently and energy and vitamin drinks the most frequently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Significant differences were observed across segments for consumption of functional foods (F(2,807) = 6.36, p = .002).
“and consumption of such foods (F(2,807) = 6.36, p = .002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The final principal component analysis revealed six principal components: food innovativeness, food self-control, hedonic eating value, convenience orientation, health importance, and weight management concern.
“The final PCA revealed six principal components: food innovativeness, food self-control, hedonic eating value, convenience orientation, health importance, and weight management concern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The third and largest segment (41.2% of the sample) was characterized by a strong convenience orientation.
“The third and largest segment (41.2% of the sample) was characterized by a strong convenience orientation and weight management concern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The self-controlled segment consumed sweets and snack foods and ready-made foods least frequently compared with the other two segments.
“The self-controlled consumed vegetables and fruits and berries the most frequently-and sweets and snack foods and ready-made foods the least frequently-compared with the other two segments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The ability of convenience-oriented segment members to control and manage their eating habits is poor.
“Members of the convenience-oriented segment are not only characterized by the fact that they are concerned with saving time and energy in planning, buying, preparing, and consuming foods, but their food choices are also affected by a marked concern about increasing body weight, and their ability to control and manage their eating habits is poor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Food self-control best distinguishes the self-controlled and the convenience-oriented consumer.
“Although health and hedonism usually are top priorities in food choices (Cunha et al., 2018) and highlighted by consumers across segments in this study, food self-control best distinguishes the self-controlled and the convenienceoriented consumer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identifies three consumer segments: convenience-oriented (41.2%), self-controlled (24.0%), and careless (34.8%).
“This study identifies three consumer segments-the convenienceoriented (41.2%), the self-controlled (24.0%), and the careless (34.8%)-which both confirms and adds to previous research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Members of the convenience-oriented segment are concerned with saving time and energy in planning, buying, preparing, and consuming foods.
“Members of the convenience-oriented segment are not only characterized by the fact that they are concerned with saving time and energy in planning, buying, preparing, and consuming foods, but their food choices are also affected by a marked concern about increasing body weight, and their ability to control and manage their eating habits is poor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The food choices of convenience-oriented segment members are affected by a marked concern about increasing body weight.
“Members of the convenience-oriented segment are not only characterized by the fact that they are concerned with saving time and energy in planning, buying, preparing, and consuming foods, but their food choices are also affected by a marked concern about increasing body weight, and their ability to control and manage their eating habits is poor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences between segments were observed on number of children living at home.
“No significant differences between segments were observed on the sociodemographic variables region and number of children living at home.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The careless consumer has a significantly higher consumption of energy and vitamin drinks compared to the convenience-oriented and the self-controlled consumers.
“The careless consumer has a significantly lower consumption of vegetables and a higher consumption of energy and vitamin drinks compared to the convenience-oriented and the self-controlled consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The segment most positive toward functional foods, motivated by weight management concern in particular, is also the one that consumes sweets and snack foods the most.
“Controversially, the segment most positive toward functional foods-motivated by weight management concern in particular-is also the one that consumes sweets and snack foods the most.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The careless consumer has a significantly lower consumption of vegetables compared to the convenience-oriented and the self-controlled consumers.
“The careless consumer has a significantly lower consumption of vegetables and a higher consumption of energy and vitamin drinks compared to the convenience-oriented and the self-controlled consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Personal values or more stable personality traits influence consumers' acceptance or consumption of functional foods.
“Furthermore, personal values or more stable personality traits also influence consumers' acceptance or consumption of functional foods (Bimbo et al., 2017;Santeramo et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Previous work has identified self-control and domain-specific innovativeness as important antecedents to food consumption behavior.
“Previous work has identified self-control (de Ridder, Lensvelt-Mulders, Finkenauer, Stok, & Baumeister, 2012;Stautz, Zupan, Field, & Marteau, 2018) and domain-specific innovativeness (Araujo, Ladeira, & Santini, 2016;Huotilainen, Pirttilä-Backman, & Tuorila, 2006) as important antecedents to food consumption behavior, but to our knowledge, no study of which we are aware has identified a segment of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites de Ridder et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stautz et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Araujo et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: No prior study has identified a segment of food-specific self-controllers.
- Study design and conductcitation
The study avoided the factor-clustering critique by using the 20 items rather than the six factors as segmentation bases.
“avoids the factor-clustering critique by including all items measuring the theoretical constructs as input in cluster analysis (Dolnicar & Grün, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dolnicar & Grün, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The relationship between broad or more general personality traits, such as the Big Five or universal human values, and specific behavior is weak.
“The relationship between broad or more general personality traits, such as the Big Five (John & Srivastava, 1999;McCrae & Costa, 1997) or universal human values (Bilsky & Schwartz, 1994;Rokeach, 1973), and specific behavior is weak (e.g., Homer & Kahle, 1988;Kassarjian, 1971;Lunn, Nowson, Worsley, & Torres, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Meta-analytic evidence points to associations between domain-specific innovativeness and innovation adoption, attitude, behavioral intentions, and product usage.
“Meta-analytic evidence points to associations between domain-specific innovativeness and innovation adoption, attitude, behavioral intentions, and product usage (Araujo et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Araujo et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Traits and values influence attitudes, intentions, and behavior indirectly through more proximal beliefs, perceptions, and attitudes in a trait/value-attitude-behavior causal chain.
“According to social cognition models, such as the theory of planned behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 1991) and selfdetermination theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985), or the cognitive hierarchy model (Homer & Kahle, 1988), values and traits influence behavioral tendencies indirectly through more proximal beliefs, perceptions, and attitudes in a trait/value-attitude-behavior causal chain (Ajzen, Fishbein, Lohmann,”
- Also stated in: § 1.1. Exploring differences in attitudes, intention, and consumption of functional foods · plain
“Traits and values are causally linked to attitudes, intentions, and behavior (Homer & Kahle, 1988;McCrae & Costa, 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ajzen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hagger & Chatzisarantis, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Homer & Kahle, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1.1. Exploring differences in attitudes, intention, and consumption of functional foods · plain
- Premisecitation
Using domain-specific values is more appropriate for understanding whether and how values are related to specific food behavior.
“Thus, several studies find that using domain-specific values is more appropriate for understanding whether and how values are related to specific (food) behavior (e.g., Hansen, Sørensen, & Eriksen, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hansen et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The association between convenience orientation and functional food behavior is inconsistent.
“However, the association between convenience orientation and functional food behavior is inconsistent (Brečić, Gorton, & Barjolle, 2014;Vorage et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Hedonism, convenience, and health are probably the most salient values underlying food choices, including the choice to consume functional foods.
“Hedonism (e.g., regarding taste), convenience, and health are probably the most salient values underlying food choices (e.g., Markovina et al., 2015;Vorage et al., 2020)-including the choice to consume functional foods (e.g., Kraus, 2015;Urala & Lähteenmäki, 2003)-and are therefore considered in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Insufficient sample size and other data-quality issues can influence the validity of segmentation solutions and thereby misguide the practical implications for commercial purposes.
“Insufficient sample size and other data-quality issues can influence the validity of segmentation solutions and thereby misguide the practical implications for commercial purposes (Dolnicar & Grün, 2017;Dolnicar, Grün, & Leisch, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dolnicar & Grün, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dolnicar et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Health importance is negatively associated with convenience orientation.
“Health importance is also negatively associated with convenience orientation (Hauser et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hauser et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A lack of food self-control leads consumers to indulge in the consumption of less healthy foods.
“Level of food self-control is further manifested in different consumption patterns, suggesting that a lack of food selfcontrol leads consumers to indulge in the consumption of less healthy foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Food innovativeness, or more precisely a lack thereof, is a significant part of the careless consumer's profile.
“Furthermore, food innovativeness-or more precisely a lack thereof-is a significant part of the careless consumer's profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The marked concern for weight gain among convenience-oriented consumers can be attributed to concerns about appearance or vanity rather than a desire to lead a healthy life.
“Hence, the marked concern for weight gain among convenience-oriented consumers can be attributed to concerns about appearance or vanity rather than a desire to lead a healthy life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results confirm the presence of a careless segment.
“For instance, the results confirm the presence of a careless segment (sometimes referred to as uninterested, uninvolved, indifferent, or unmotivated) (Brečić et al., 2017;Sparke & Menrad, 2009;Szakály et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Convenience orientation plays an important part in functional food consumption.
“Similarly, the results suggest that convenience orientation plays an important part in functional food consumption; thus, the identification of a convenience-oriented segment was not unexpected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The current study shows that domain-specific trait self-control and food innovativeness effectively discriminate between consumer segments.
“The current study contributes to the functional food consumer literature by showing how domain-specific trait self-control and food innovativeness effectively discriminate between consumer segments, adding to the understanding of what characterizes the functional food consumer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Self-reports of weight-concerns and restraint are reflective of intentions and wishes to restrict intake, rather than of actual eating behavior.
“van der Laan et al. (2014) found that weightconcerned women primarily based their food choices on taste considerations rather than on energy content, which suggests that “self-reports of weight-concerns and restraint are reflective of intentions and wishes to restrict intake, rather than of actual eating behavior” (p. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van der Laan et al. (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The self-controlled consumer fits the description of the typical functional food consumer (female, well-educated/higher income class, older than 55 years).
“The self-controlled consumer fits the description of “the typical functional food consumer” (i.e., being female, well-educated/higher income class, and being older than 55 years) (Siró et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Siró et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The intraindividual combination of low self-control, pronounced weight management concern, and convenience orientation is paramount to understanding convenience-oriented consumers' consumption behavior.
“We believe that this intraindividual combination of low selfcontrol, pronounced weight management concern, and convenience orientation is paramount to understanding their consumption behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Weight-concerned women primarily base their food choices on taste considerations rather than on energy content.
“van der Laan et al. (2014) found that weightconcerned women primarily based their food choices on taste considerations rather than on energy content, which suggests that “self-reports of weight-concerns and restraint are reflective of intentions and wishes to restrict intake, rather than of actual eating behavior” (p. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van der Laan et al. (2014) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The mixture of food-related traits and values as bases for segmentation is useful in explaining and describing differences in consumer attitudes, intention, and consumption.
“The mixture of food-related traits and values as bases for segmentation proves useful in explaining and describing differences in consumer attitudes, intention, and consumption:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Convenience-oriented consumers' lack of self-control, combined with a pronounced concern for weight management, may explain their higher consumption frequency of sweets, snack foods, and ready-made foods compared to self-controlled consumers.
“Thus, convenience-oriented consumers' (i.e., mostly women) lack of selfcontrol, combined with a pronounced concern for weight management, may explain their higher consumption frequency of sweets, snack foods, and ready-made foods compared to self-controlled consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The convenience-oriented consumer may compensate for their lower consumption of naturally healthy foods by consuming more functional foods.
“Thus, the convenienceoriented consumer may compensate for their lower consumption of naturally healthy foods by consuming more functional foods-a convenient means to eat healthily.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Low levels of food innovativeness may help explain why the careless consumer is more reluctant to eat functional foods.
“Their low levels of food innovativeness may thus help to explain why the careless consumer is more reluctant to eat functional foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The combination of being convenience oriented, concerned about gaining weight from what you eat, and having a low level of self-control is characteristic of consumers more inclined to evaluate the consumption of functional food favorably.
“the combination of being convenience oriented, concerned about gaining weight from what you eat, and having a low level of self-control is characteristic of consumers more inclined to evaluate the consumption of functional food favorably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Consumer acceptance of or consumption behavior related to functional foods varies according to the perceived fit between the carrier and ingredients or the exact product under scrutiny.
“Consumer acceptance of or consumption behavior related to functional foods is not unconditional but varies according to the perceived fit between the carrier and ingredients (e.g., Krutulyte et al., 2011;Lu, 2015) or the exact product under scrutiny (e.g., de Jong, Ocke, Branderhorst, & Friele, 2003), among other factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductcitation
The choices of individual domain-specific traits and values included in this study are operationally robust in the assessment of constructs.
“The choices of individual domain-specific traits and values included in this study are both theoretically grounded in the personality and social psychology literature (McCrae & Costa, 1995;Rokeach, 1973;Schwartz, 2012) and are operationally robust in the assessment of constructs (e.g., Tangney et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tangney et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Convenience plays a significant role in functional food consumers' decision-making.
“Convenience plays a significant role in functional food consumers' decisionmaking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The resulting segment sizes can more reliably come to represent true shares of consumers within the different segments.
“For example, the resulting segment sizes can more reliably come to represent “true” shares of consumers within the different segments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The results suggest that functional foods meet the expectations of the convenience-oriented consumer quite well.
“the results of this study therefore suggest that functional foods meet the expectations of the convenience-oriented consumer quite well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Consumption of functional foods is closely linked to attributes such as convenience and health.
- Study design and conductcitation
The study used an item-clustering rather than a factor-clustering technique.
“Other strengths of this study pertain to the use of a nationally representative sample, unlike several other segmentation studies (e.g., Annunziata & Pascale, 2009;Ares & Gámbaro, 2007;van der Zanden et al., 2015), and to the use of an “itemclustering” rather than a “factor-clustering” technique (Dolnicar & Grün, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dolnicar & Grün, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The study demonstrated how food-related values and traits can successfully distinguish among homogeneous groups of consumers.
“This study has demonstrated how food-related values and traits can successfully distinguish among homogeneous groups of consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The person-centered approach made it possible to uncover and describe how the Norwegian consumer profiles differ from each other in terms of consumption habits, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward eating functional foods, as well as socio-demographics.
“The person-centered approach has made it possible to uncover and describe how the Norwegian consumer profiles differ from each other in terms of consumption habits, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward eating functional foods, as well as socio-demographics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Level of self-control appears instrumental in differentiating between consumers who are high vs. low in their consumption of functional food.
“Level of self-control thus appears to be instrumental in differentiating between consumers who are high vs. low in their consumption of functional food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The study used a nationally representative sample.
“Other strengths of this study pertain to the use of a nationally representative sample, unlike several other segmentation studies (e.g., Annunziata & Pascale, 2009;Ares & Gámbaro, 2007;van der Zanden et al., 2015), and to the use of an “itemclustering” rather than a “factor-clustering” technique (Dolnicar & Grün, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The sample is representative of the Norwegian adult population.
- Premisecitation
Food consumption patterns tend to vary between countries.
“Since food consumption patterns (Gracia & Albisu, 2001) and food choice motives (Prescott, Young, O'Neill, Yau, & Stevens, 2002;Sparke & Menrad, 2009) tend to vary between countries, future research should include consumers from several countries to validate these findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gracia & Albisu, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The choices of individual domain-specific traits and values included in this study are theoretically grounded in the personality and social psychology literature.
“The choices of individual domain-specific traits and values included in this study are both theoretically grounded in the personality and social psychology literature (McCrae & Costa, 1995;Rokeach, 1973;Schwartz, 2012) and are operationally robust in the assessment of constructs (e.g., Tangney et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites McCrae & Costa, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rokeach, 1973
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schwartz, 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
- May combine two claims. 41
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the convenience-oriented segment, the age distribution is almost normal but with slightly fewer consumers in the 50-59 age group (16.8%).
“Like the careless segment, the age distribution is almost normal but with slightly fewer consumers in the 50-59 age group (16.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe self-controlled segment consists of 194 consumers.
“The self-controlled segment consists of 194 consumers, with women slightly overrepresented (54.1%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll age groups are equally represented in the careless segment, with 50-59-year-olds slightly underrepresented (15.6%).
“All age groups are equally represented, with 50-59-year-olds slightly underrepresented (15.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe initial principal component analysis resulted in seven principal components.
“The initial PCA resulted in seven principal components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe careless segment consists of 282 consumers.
“The careless segment consists of 282 consumers-mostly men (61.7%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe two items capturing weight management concern loaded onto a separate component.
“The two items capturing weight management concern loaded onto a separate component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWomen are slightly overrepresented in the self-controlled segment (54.1%).
“The self-controlled segment consists of 194 consumers, with women slightly overrepresented (54.1%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe convenience-oriented segment comprises 334 consumers.
“The convenience-oriented segment comprises 334 consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe self-controlled consumer eats naturally healthy foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, and berries) more often and unhealthy foods (e.g., sweets, snack foods, and ready-made foods) less often.
“Although the self-controlled consumer eats naturally healthy foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, and berries) more often and unhealthy foods (e.g., sweets, snack foods, and ready-made foods) less often, the convenience-oriented consumer has the most favorable attitudes and is most positive about consuming functional foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe convenience-oriented consumer exhibits low levels of self-control and is highly concerned about weight management.
“Furthermore, the convenience-oriented consumer exhibits low levels of self-control and is highly concerned about weight management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe typical convenience-oriented consumers are women of all ages who find it difficult to abandon bad food habits.
“The typical convenience-oriented consumers are women of all ages who find it difficult to abandon bad food habits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe convenience-oriented consumer has the most favorable attitudes and is most positive about consuming functional foods.
“Although the self-controlled consumer eats naturally healthy foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, and berries) more often and unhealthy foods (e.g., sweets, snack foods, and ready-made foods) less often, the convenience-oriented consumer has the most favorable attitudes and is most positive about consuming functional foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe convenience-oriented consumer has the most positive attitudes toward eating functional foods, the strongest intentions to consume such foods, and the highest consumption frequency of this type of food.
“The convenience-oriented consumer has the most positive attitudes toward eating functional foods, the strongest intentions to consume such foods, as well as the highest consumption frequency of this type of food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe majority of the careless have a lower level of education (elementary school and high school) and appear to be uninvolved or uninterested in both food and health.
“The majority of the careless have a lower level of education (elementary school and high school) and appear to be uninvolved or uninterested in both food and health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe majority rule suggested three clusters as the most appropriate solution.
“The majority rule 1 suggested three clusters as the most appropriate solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn contrast to convenience-oriented consumers, self-controlled consumers are not as concerned about weight management but emphasize the importance of health somewhat more.
“In contrast to convenience-oriented consumers, self-controlled consumers are not as concerned about weight management but emphasize the importance of health somewhat more.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe careless consumers comprise mostly men and are characterized by a reluctance or incuriosity toward new food experiences.
“The careless consumers comprise mostly men and are characterized by a reluctance or incuriosity toward new food experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth the convenience-oriented and the self-controlled consumer are equally motivated by hedonism, but the latter has high levels of self-control and the former has low levels of this trait.
“Both the convenience-oriented and the self-controlled consumer are equally motivated by hedonism, but where the latter has high levels of self-control, the former has low levels of this trait.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe segment most inclined to consume functional foods also had a pronounced concern about weight gain and was overtly convenience oriented.
“Worth noting is that the segment most inclined to consume functional foods also had a pronounced concern about weight gain and was overtly convenience oriented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFunctional foods promote optimal health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases.
“Therefore, functional foods promote optimal health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases (Granato, Nunes, & Barba, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Granato, Nunes, & Barba, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFunctional foods belong to a relatively new and ambiguous food category for consumers.
“Functional foods belong to a relatively new and ambiguous food category for consumers (Annunziata & Vecchio, 2011;Scrinis, 2008) and hence, it has been suggested to attract attention from food innovators and variety-seekers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Annunziata & Vecchio, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scrinis, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDomain-specific innovativeness is predictive of willingness to try and use new food products, including functional foods.
“Further, research has demonstrated that domain-specific innovativeness is predictive of willingness to try and use new food products, including functional foods (Huotilainen et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huotilainen et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the area of food, consumers demand variety in their diet for hedonic and utilitarian reasons.
“In the area of food, consumers demand variety in their diet for hedonic and utilitarian reasons (Baltas, Kokkinaki, & Loukopoulou, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baltas et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth personality traits and universal values are relatively stable and transcend specific actions and situations.
“However, both personality traits and universal values are relatively stable and transcend specific actions and situations (Kassarjian, 1971;Schwartz & Bilsky, 1987), distinguishing these constructs from attitudes and intentions that usually refer to more specific actions, objects, or situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kassarjian, 1971 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schwartz & Bilsky, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBoth variety-seeking tendency and consumer innovativeness are relevant concepts in predicting or explaining consumer behavior with respect to foods.
“Both VST and CI are thus relevant concepts in predicting or explaining consumer behavior with respect to foods (Huotilainen et al., 2006;van Trijp & Steenkamp, 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Huotilainen et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van Trijp & Steenkamp, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFunctional foods have been suggested to attract attention from food innovators and variety-seekers.
“Functional foods belong to a relatively new and ambiguous food category for consumers (Annunziata & Vecchio, 2011;Scrinis, 2008) and hence, it has been suggested to attract attention from food innovators and variety-seekers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals with strong variety-seeking tendency with respect to foods become bored more quickly and are especially receptive to new products but are less inclined to develop loyalty to specific brands or products.
“It has been suggested that individuals with strong VST with respect to foods become bored more quickly and are especially receptive to new products but are less inclined to develop loyalty to specific brands or products (van Trijp & Steenkamp, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Trijp & Steenkamp, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConsumer acceptance of functional foods is contingent upon various factors associated with sensory attributes, health claims or benefits, and cognitive, motivational, or attitudinal determinants.
“Consumer acceptance of functional foods is contingent upon various factors associated with sensory attributes, health claims or benefits, and cognitive, motivational, or attitudinal determinants (Siró et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Siró et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntention constitutes a motivational force for subsequent behavior that predicts healthy eating behavior.
“Intention, in turn, constitutes a motivational force for subsequent behavior (Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010;Sheeran, 2002) that predicts (healthy) eating behavior (Conner, Norman, & Bell, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAttitude is a strong predictor of behavior and is associated with behavioral intention to consume a variety of foods, including functional foods.
“Commonly, attitude is a strong predictor of behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977) and is associated with behavioral intention to consume a variety of foods (Cook, Kerr, & Moore, 2002;Patch, Tapsell, & Williams, 2005;Verbeke, 2005), including functional foods (Hung, de Kok, & Verbeke, 2016;O'Connor & White, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study used a nationally representative sample of 810 Norwegian adults, representative of sex, age, and region, surveyed in January 2019.
“A large sample (N = 810) of the Norwegian adult population-representative of sex, age, and region-was surveyed in January 2019.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“The current research employs a nationally representative sample of 810 Norwegian consumers to ascertain valid cluster solutions of appropriate segment sizes and avoids the factor-clustering critique by including all items measuring the theoretical constructs as input in cluster analysis (Dolnicar & Grün, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHedonic-oriented consumers are more open to new experiences, seek variety, and have less self-control.
“It has been suggested that hedonic-oriented consumers are more open to new experiences (Guido, 2006), seek variety (Olsen, Tudoran, Honkanen, & Verplanken, 2016), and have less self-control (Horwath, Hagmann, & Hartmann, 2020;Vosgerau et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelf-control is highly relevant for explaining or predicting healthy and unhealthy food consumption, with both direct and indirect effects on behavior.
“Self-control is highly relevant for explaining or predicting healthy and unhealthy food consumption (de Ridder et al., 2012;Tangney et al., 2004), with both direct and indirect effects on behavior (Hagger, Hankonen, et al., 2019;McCarthy, Collins, Flaherty, & McCarthy, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites de Ridder et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tangney et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hagger et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The only other study investigating associations between trait self-control and functional food consumption is Barauskaite et al. (2018).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIndividual differences in self-control are related to health-harming consumption behaviors, including consumption of unhealthy foods.
“Individual differences in self-control are related to health-harming consumption behaviors, including consumption of unhealthy foods (for a review, see Stautz et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stautz et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe relationship between universal values and domain-specific decision-making or behavior is complicated and mostly weak.
“However, the relationship between universal values and domainspecific decision-making or behavior is complicated and mostly weak (Cieciuch, 2017;Krystallis, Vassallo, & Chryssohoidis, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cieciuch, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Krystallis et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHealthfulness is one among several dimensions of food quality and food choices in consumers' minds.
“Healthfulness is one among several dimensions of food quality and food choices in consumers' minds (Grunert, 2010;Pollard, Steptoe, & Wardle, 1998;Steptoe et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConvenience orientation is positively associated with hedonism or sensory appeal.
“Previous studies suggest that convenience orientation is positively associated with hedonism or sensory appeal (Fotopoulos, Krystallis, Vassallo, & Pagiaslis, 2009;Pula, Parks, & Ross, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealth-related motives or values are associated with functional food behavior, and health motivation is a significant predictor of willingness to buy functional foods.
“Health-related motives or values are also associated with functional food behavior (Brečić et al., 2014;Pappalardo & Lusk, 2016;Vorage et al., 2020) and health motivation is a significant predictor of willingness to buy functional foods (Hauser, Nussbeck, & Jonas, 2013;Siegrist, Shi, Giusto, & Hartmann, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConsumers engaged in health-promoting behaviors, such as healthy eating, exercise higher levels of self-control.
“It has been suggested that consumers engaged in health-promoting behaviors, such as healthy eating, exercise higher levels of self-control (de Ridder et al., 2012;Hagger, Gucciardi, et al., 2019;Hankonen, Kinnunen, Absetz, & Jallinoja, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh levels of self-control imply utilitarian or healthy consumption whereas low levels of self-control suggest hedonic consumption, although exceptions exist.
“As such, high levels of selfcontrol would imply utilitarian or healthy consumption whereas low levels of self-control would suggest hedonic consumption, although exceptions exist (e.g., Salmon, Fennis, de Ridder, Adriaanse, & De Vet, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salmon et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelf-control is a facet of conscientiousness within the Big Five personality framework and is associated with conformity in Schwartz' theory of basic values.
“It has been suggested that self-control is a facet of conscientiousness within the Big Five personality framework (Roberts, Chernyshenko, Stark, & Goldberg, 2005;Tangney et al., 2004) and associated with conformity in Schwartz' theory of basic values (Schwartz, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConsumers are increasingly concerned about convenience, a huge trend in the food industry.
“Aside from hedonic eating value, consumers are increasingly concerned about convenience-a huge trend in the food industry (Bleiel, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bleiel, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConsumers are drawn to the pleasurable sensory attributes of foods, and good taste is a particularly important motive behind food choices, including functional foods.
“Consumers are drawn to the pleasurable sensory attributes of foods (Lusk & Briggeman, 2009), and good taste is a particularly important motive behind food choices (Honkanen & Frewer, 2009;Januszewska, Pieniak, & Verbeke, 2011;Markovina et al., 2015), including functional foods (Urala & Lähteenmäki, 2003;Verbeke, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lusk & Briggeman, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Honkanen & Frewer, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Urala & Lähteenmäki, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataConvenience-oriented consumers are more positive toward and more prone to consume functional foods.
“results suggest that convenience-oriented consumers are more positive toward and more prone to consume functional foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenRespondents were randomly selected from a pool of prerecruited members of YouGov, a reputed research agency.
“Respondents were randomly selected from a pool of prerecruited members of YouGov, a reputed research agency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFactor loadings ranged from 0.72 to 0.88 and internal reliability scores exceeded the lower threshold of Cronbach's alpha of 0.70.
“Factor loadings ranged from 0.72 to 0.88 and internal reliability scores exceeded the lower threshold of Cronbach's α (i.e., 0.70; Hair, Black, Babin, & Anderson, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost previous segmentation studies regarding functional food include smaller, nonrepresentative samples or apply factor-clustering techniques.
“Finally, most of the previous segmentation studies regarding functional food include smaller, nonrepresentative samples (e.g., Annunziata & Pascale, 2009;Ares & Gámbaro, 2007;van der Zanden, van Kleef, de Wijk, & van Trijp, 2015) or apply factorclustering techniques (Brečić, Mesić, & Cerjak, 2017;Szakály, Szente, Kövér, Polereczki, & Szigeti, 2012) (for a critical account of factor clustering, see”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe careless consumer resembles the uninvolved consumer: exhibiting little demand for novelties and being conservative in their food choices.
“Similar to Szakály et al. (2012), the careless consumer in the present study resembles the uninvolved consumer: exhibiting little demand for novelties and being conservative in their food choices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szakály et al. (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFood innovativeness and self-control are two traits imperative to understanding consumers' food choices.
“Overall, the roles of food innovativeness and self-control add nuance to the existing literature in the domain of functional food behavior and represent two traits imperative to understanding consumers' food choices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe convenience-oriented consumer's lack of food self-control entails both an admission of having difficulty in abandoning bad food habits and a desire to improve their self-discipline when choosing what to eat.
“Their lack of food self-control entails both an admission of having difficulty in abandoning bad food habits and at the same time a desire to improve their self-discipline when choosing what to eat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe person-centered approach sheds light on intraindividual combinations of values and traits and how different consumer profiles relate to functional food behavior and food consumption habits.
“Our person-centered approach also contributes by shedding light on the intraindividual combinations of values and traits and how different consumer profiles relate to functional food behavior and food consumption habits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWeight-concerned people, and women in particular, generally find it difficult to control their food intake.
“Previous studies have demonstrated that weight-concerned people-and women in particular-generally find it difficult to control their food intake (van der Laan, de Ridder, Charbonnier, Viergever, & Smeets, 2014) and that self-control is predictive of weight loss success (Will Crescioni et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van der Laan, de Ridder, Charbonnier, Viergever, & Smeets, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSelf-control is predictive of weight loss success.
“Previous studies have demonstrated that weight-concerned people-and women in particular-generally find it difficult to control their food intake (van der Laan, de Ridder, Charbonnier, Viergever, & Smeets, 2014) and that self-control is predictive of weight loss success (Will Crescioni et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Will Crescioni et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies have repeatedly reported that women are the main target of functional foods owing to their being more reflective about food and health issues compared with men.
“This agrees with the results of previous studies that have repeatedly reported that women are the main target of functional foods owing to their being more reflective about food and health issues compared with men (Siró et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Siró et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe enthusiastic beauty-oriented consumers often purchased functional foods and were particularly motivated for beauty reasons as opposed to health per se.
“These consumers often purchased functional foods and were particularly motivated for beauty reasons as opposed to health per se.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sparke and Menrad (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe identification of three consumer segments confirms and adds to previous research.
“This study identifies three consumer segments-the convenienceoriented (41.2%), the self-controlled (24.0%), and the careless (34.8%)-which both confirms and adds to previous research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe convenience-oriented segment outnumbers the other two segments and represents potentially a market of significant size that functional food producers can target.
“It is worth noting that this segment also outnumbers the other two segments and thus represents not only a niche market but potentially a market of significant size that functional food producers can target.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSparke and Menrad (2009) identified a segment named the enthusiastic beauty-oriented.
“This is similar to Sparke and Menrad (2009), who identified a segment named the enthusiastic beauty-oriented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sparke and Menrad (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFood choice motives tend to vary between countries.
“Since food consumption patterns (Gracia & Albisu, 2001) and food choice motives (Prescott, Young, O'Neill, Yau, & Stevens, 2002;Sparke & Menrad, 2009) tend to vary between countries, future research should include consumers from several countries to validate these findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Prescott, Young, O'Neill, Yau, & Stevens, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sparke & Menrad, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was conducted in accordance with the Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees' Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology.
“We wish to confirm that the study was conducted in accordance with the Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees' Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe study examined 30 validation indices to determine the most appropriate number of clusters.
“To justify this decision, we examined 30 validation indices to determine the most appropriate number of clusters (R package NbClust; Charrad, Ghazzali, Boiteau, & Niknafs, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Charrad, Ghazzali, Boiteau, & Niknafs, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAlthough self-controlled consumers actively seek new food ideas and find pleasure in new food experiences, their weaker convenience orientation may explain why they do not consider functional foods more favorable.
“Although self-controlled consumers actively seek new food ideas and find pleasure in new food experiences-a trait previously associated with proneness to consuming functional foods (cf., Huotilainen et al., 2006)-their weaker convenience orientation may explain why they do not consider functional foods more favorable (Brečić et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn the present study, the self-controlled consumer has similarities with both the rational and the adventurous consumer, such as elevated responsiveness to novelty and attraction toward new food products, as well as an emphasis on health.
“Compared to the results of some previous studies using the FRL (e.g., Buckley, Cowan, McCarthy, & O'Sullivan, 2005;Szakály et al., 2012), in the present study, the self-controlled consumer has similarities with both the rational and the adventurous consumer, such as elevated responsiveness to novelty and attraction toward new food products, as well as an emphasis on health.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buckley, Cowan, McCarthy, & O'Sullivan, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szakály et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe identification and characteristics of the self-controlled consumer segment is a significant contribution of this study.
“The identification and characteristics of the self-controlled consumer segment is a significant contribution of this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenWith a large sample size, the study is expected to yield more valid and reliable results.
“With a large sample size, we expect that our study will yield more valid and reliable results, reinforcing the practical implications for functional food producers and marketers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe stronger weight management concern of the convenience-oriented consumer can possibly be attributed to an underlying motivation to achieve or maintain a desired appearance and may not necessarily reflect a general health motive.
“The stronger weight management concern of the convenienceoriented consumer can possibly be attributed to an underlying motivation to achieve or maintain a desired appearance and may not necessarily reflect a general health motive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSelf-controlled consumers' high level of food self-control, coupled with their emphasis on health importance, may explain their higher consumption frequency of naturally healthy foods and their modest consumption of functional foods, ready-made foods, sweets, and snack foods.
“Their high level of food selfcontrol, coupled with their emphasis on health importance, may therefore explain their higher consumption frequency of naturally healthy foods, such as fruit, berries, and vegetables, and their modest consumption of functional foods, ready-made foods, sweets, and snack foods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe inconsistency between being most positive toward functional foods and consuming sweets and snack foods the most may be due to low levels of self-control regarding food.
“This inconsistency may be due to low levels of self-control regarding food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
No prior study has identified a segment of food-specific self-controllers.
“to our knowledge, no study of which we are aware has identified a segment of food-specific self-controllers as suggested in the current research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The only other study investigating associations between trait self-control and functional food consumption is Barauskaite et al. (2018).
“To the authors' knowledge, the only other study investigating associations between trait self-control and functional food consumption is that of Barauskaite et al. (2018).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported attitudes, intentions, and consumption frequencies accurately reflect actual attitudes, intentions, and consumption behavior.
“The convenience-oriented consumers also reported the highest consumption frequency of functional foods (M = 3.11, SD = 1.65).”
“Consumers in the latter two segments did not differ in their attitude toward and intention to consume functional foods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample is representative of the Norwegian adult population.
“Other strengths of this study pertain to the use of a nationally representative sample, unlike several other segmentation studies (e.g., Annunziata & Pascale, 2009;Ares & Gámbaro, 2007;van der Zanden et al., 2015), and to the use of an “itemclustering” rather than a “factor-clustering” technique (Dolnicar & Grün, 2008).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consumption of functional foods is closely linked to attributes such as convenience and health.
“In fact, consumption of functional foods is closely linked to attributes such as convenience and health, and the results of this study therefore suggest that functional foods meet the expectations of the convenience-oriented consumer quite well.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In epidemiological studies, fermented dairy products have been associated with a reduced risk of metabolic syndrome.
“In epidemiological studies, fermented dairy products have been associated with a reduced risk of metabolic syndrome [186]”
From The Potential Impact of Probiotics on Human Health: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties (2024) · cites this paper as [186]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentF(2, 807) = 25.9reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(2,807) = 25.90, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(2, 807) = 20.72reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(2,807) = 20.72,p < .001”
- ConsistentF(2, 807) = 6.36reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002
“F(2,807) = 6.36, p = .002”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Consumption-frequency response options overlap
MinorThe scale assigns "once a month" to option 3, but that frequency is also included in option 2's "1-3 times a month." The two response options are therefore not distinct.
“2 (1-3 times a month)”
“3 (once a month)”
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Deciphering the consumer behaviour facets of functional foods: A literature review
Kaur, N., & Singh, D. P. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.033 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
RetractedR: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737 · see citing works
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,361 · see citing works
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144 · see citing works
(1999) · Cited by 7,995 · see citing works
Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research
Krueger, R. F., & Johnson, W. (2008) · Cited by 7,884 · see citing works
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Commonly, attitude is a strong predictor of behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977) and is associated with behavioral intention to consume a variety of foods (Cook, Kerr, & Moore, 2002; Patch, Tapsell, & Williams, 2005; Verbeke, 2005), including functional foods (Hung, de Kok, & Verbeke, 2016; O’Connor &…”
BackgroundHigh self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x · Cited by 6,557 · see citing works
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020 · see citing works
Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?
Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x · Cited by 5,803 · see citing works
Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298204600314 · Cited by 5,616 · see citing works
Nature and Operation of Attitudes
Ajzen, I. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27 · Cited by 4,321 · see citing works
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509 · Cited by 4,234 · see citing works
An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values
Schwartz, S. H. (2012) · Online Readings in Psychology and Culture · doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116 · Cited by 4,147 · see citing works
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688 · see citing works
Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 · Cited by 3,617 · see citing works
<b>NbClust</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v061.i06 · Cited by 3,396 · see citing works
Predicting and Changing Behavior
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203838020 · Cited by 2,807 · see citing works
Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251707 · Cited by 2,565 · see citing works
STEPTOE, A., POLLARD, T. M., & WARDLE, J. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061 · Cited by 2,176 · see citing works
Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238 · Cited by 2,151 · see citing works
A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy.
Homer, P., & Kahle, L. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638 · Cited by 2,041 · see citing works
Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies
Smith, W. R. (1956) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224295602100102 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies
Smith, W. R. (1956) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247695 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—a review
Siró, I., Kápolna, E., Kápolna, B., & Lugasi, A. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060 · Cited by 1,758 · see citing works
de Ridder, D. T. D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311418749 · Cited by 1,693 · see citing works
Measuring Consumer Innovativeness
Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02726497 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo‐Noam, A. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202289008 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices
Arbelaitz, O., Gurrutxaga, I., Muguerza, J., Pérez, J. M., & Perona, I. (2012) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2012.07.021 · Cited by 1,393 · see citing works
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251945 · Cited by 1,282 · see citing works
Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person-Specific Approaches: Where Theory Meets the Method
Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117744021 · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2018) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · doi:10.4324/9781315178103-5 · Cited by 1,060 · see citing works
Measuring Consumer Innovativeness
Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207039101900306 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues
Crites, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294206001 · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants
Verbeke, W. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.01.001 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Functional Foods: Product Development, Technological Trends, Efficacy Testing, and Safety
Granato, D., Barba, F. J., Kovačević, D. B., Lorenzo, J. M., da Cruz, A. G., & Putnik, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-032519-051708 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
ROBERTS, B. W., CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., STARK, S., & GOLDBERG, L. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x · Cited by 786 · see citing works
The Role of Personal Values in Marketing and Consumer Behavior
Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E., & Lamont, L. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224297704100215 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000) · International Series in Quantitative Marketing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4651-1 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Roehrich, G. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00311-9 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2008) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910708x373959 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1992) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209313 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption
Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.003 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health?
Verbeke, W. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.003 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2008) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses [R package factoextra version 1.0.7]
Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2020) · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Personality and consumer behavior: A review
Kassarjian, H. H. (1971) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377100800401 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating
Conner, M., Norman, P., & Bell, R. (2002) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.2.194 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2410080303 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services
Kahn, B. E. (1995) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/0969-6989(95)00038-0 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Ares, G., & Gámbaro, A. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.006 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food
Cook, A., Kerr, G., & Moore, K. (2002) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(02)00117-4 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review
Kassarjian, H. H. (1971) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150229 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand
Prescott, J., Young, O. A., O’Neill, L. M., Yau, N. J. N., & Stevens, R. (2002) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00010-1 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Trait explanations in personality psychology
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1995) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2410090402 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
International market segmentation: issues and perspectives
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Hofstede, F. T. (2002) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(02)00076-9 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices
Urala, N., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2003) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/00346650310488499 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Olsen, S. O. (2002) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00055-1 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationGranato, D., Nunes, D. S., & Barba, F. J. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.010 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Hansen, T., Sørensen, M. I., & Eriksen, M.-L. R. (2018) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.003 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Functional Food—Consumer Motivations and Expectations
Topolska, K., Florkiewicz, A., & Filipiak‐Florkiewicz, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18105327 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of functional food consumers and dietary supplement users
de Jong, N., Ocké, M. C., Branderhorst, H. A. C., & Friele, R. (2003) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2002772 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Consumers' convenience orientation towards meal preparation: conceptualization and measurement
Candel, M. J. J. M. (2001) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.2000.0364 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Intention to consume seafood—the importance of habit
Honkanen, P., Olsen, S. O., & Verplanken, B. (2005) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.04.005 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationConsumption of organic and functional food. A matter of well-being and health?
Goetzke, B., Nitzko, S., & Spiller, A. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.012 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Consumers' variety seeking tendency with respect to foods: Measurement and managerial implications
van Trijp, J. C. M., & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (1992) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/19.2.181 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research
Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.05.002 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Bimbo, F., Bonanno, A., Nocella, G., Viscecchia, R., Nardone, G., De Devitiis, B., & Carlucci, D. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.031 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Functional foods development in the European market: A consumer perspective
Annunziata, A., & Vecchio, R. (2011) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.011 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research
Goldsmith, R. E., Freiden, J. B., & Eastman, J. K. (1995) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/0166-4972(95)99328-d · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1995) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(93)e0035-8 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Food choice questionnaire revisited in four countries. Does it still measure the same?
Januszewska, R., Pieniak, Z., & Verbeke, W. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.03.014 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Challenging “Factor–Cluster Segmentation”
Dolničar, S., & Grün, B. (2008) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287508318910 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry
Santeramo, F. G., Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Seccia, A., Stasi, A., Viscecchia, R., & Nardone, G. (2018) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
High trait self-control predicts positive health behaviors and success in weight loss
Will Crescioni, A., Ehrlinger, J., Alquist, J. L., Conlon, K. E., Baumeister, R. F., Schatschneider, C., & Dutton, G. R. (2011) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105310390247 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Hung, Y., de Kok, T. M., & Verbeke, W. (2016) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.002 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Re-thinking functional food development through a holistic approach
Alongi, M., & Anese, M. (2021) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2021.104466 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Russian consumers’ motives for food choice
Honkanen, P., & Frewer, L. J. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.009 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
POLLARD, T. M., STEPTOE, A., & WARDLE, J. (1998) · Journal of Biosocial Science · doi:10.1017/s0021932098001655 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Determinants of fast-food consumption. An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour
Dunn, K. I., Mohr, P. B., Wilson, C. J., & Wittert, G. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.004 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Cunha, L. M., Cabral, D., Moura, A. P., & de Almeida, M. D. V. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.007 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Exploring the relationship between convenience and fish consumption: A cross-cultural study
Olsen, S. O., Scholderer, J., Brunsø, K., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.12.002 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationFotopoulos, C., Krystallis, A., Vassallo, M., & Pagiaslis, A. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.014 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
A structural look at consumer innovativeness and self‐congruence in new product purchases
Cowart, K. O., Fox, G. L., & Wilson, A. E. (2008) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20256 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Food4Me study: Validity and reliability of food choice questionnaire in 9 European countries
Markovina, J., Stewart-Knox, B. J., Rankin, A., Gibney, M., de Almeida, M. D. V., Fischer, A., Kuznesof, S. A., Poínhos, R., Panzone, L., & Frewer, L. J. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.002 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Development and Testing of a Cross-Culturally Valid Instrument: Food-Related Life Style
Bruns⊘, K., & Grunert, K. G. (1995) · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Domain‐specific Market Segmentation
van Raaij, W. F., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (1994) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569410075786 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Díaz, L. D., Fernández‐Ruiz, V., & Cámara, M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2019.1592107 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
The influence of lifestyle on health behavior and preference for functional foods
Szakály, Z., Szente, V., Kövér, G., Polereczki, Z., & Szigeti, O. (2012) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.003 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
The effect of health benefit information on consumers health value, attitudes and intentions
Tudoran, A. A., Olsen, S. O., & Dopico, D. C. (2009) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.01.009 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth on impulse: When low self-control promotes healthy food choices
Salmon, S. J., Fennis, B. M., de Ridder, D. T. D., Adriaanse, M. A., & de Vet, E. (2014) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031785 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Does personality affect dietary intake?
Lunn, T. E., Nowson, C. A., Worsley, A., & Torres, S. J. (2014) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2013.08.012 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Worlds apart. Consumer acceptance of functional foods and beverages in Germany and China
Siegrist, M., Shi, J., Giusto, A., & Hartmann, C. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.017 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Huang, L., Bai, L., Zhang, X., & Gong, S. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.11.001 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Fotopoulos, C. V., Krystallis, A., Vassallo, M., & Pagiaslis, A. P. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies
Dolnicar, S., Grün, B., & Leisch, F. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.004 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Food consumption in the European Union: Main determinants and country differences
Gracía, A., & Albisu, L. M. (2001) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.1030 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Attitudes and Intentions toward Purchasing Novel Foods Enriched with Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Patch, C. S., Tapsell, L. C., & Williams, P. (2005) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60277-7 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Krutulyte, R., Grunert, K. G., Scholderer, J., Lähteenmäki, L., Hagemann, K. S., Elgaard, P., Nielsen, B., & Graverholt, J. P. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.001 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
The role of beliefs in purchasing process of functional foods
Pappalardo, G., & Lusk, J. L. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.009 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Pula, K., Parks, C. D., & Ross, C. F. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.015 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Does variety seeking vary between hedonic and utilitarian products? The role of attribute type
Baltas, G., Kokkinaki, F., & Loukopoulou, A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1649 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Olsen, S. O., Tudoran, A. A., Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2016) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20853 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationKraus, A. (2015) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12144 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Huotilainen, A., Pirttilä-backman, A.-M., & Tuorila, H. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.04.005 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Barauskaitė, D., Gineikienė, J., Fennis, B. M., Auruškevičienė, V., Yamaguchi, M., & Kondo, N. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.015 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P. J., Struyf, A., et al. (2019) · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Importance of intrinsic and extrinsic quality food characteristics by different consumer segments
Brečić, R., Mesić, Ž., & Cerjak, M. (2017) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-06-2016-0284 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Who consumes functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada?
Herath, D., Cranfield, J., & Henson, S. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.02.018 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Hagger, M. S., Gucciardi, D. F., Turrell, A. S., & Hamilton, K. (2019) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12378 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Perspectives and Dimensions of Consumer Innovativeness: A Literature Review and Future Agenda
Kaushik, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2014) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2014.893150 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Hauser, M., Nussbeck, F. W., & Jonas, K. (2013) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20644 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Consumer Trends and Attitudes to Functional Foods
Karelakis, C. D., Zevgitis, P., Galanopoulos, K., & Mattas, K. A. (2019) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2019.1599760 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Opportunities and constraints in the functional food market
Gray, J. A., Armstrong, G. A., & Farley, H. (2003) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/00346650310499730 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Segmentation in Social Marketing
Kubacki, K., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Dietrich, T. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1835-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
O’Connor, E. L., & White, K. M. (2009) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.004 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
The Convenience Consumer and Food-Related Lifestyles in Great Britain
Buckley, M., Cowan, C. A., McCarthy, M. B., & O'Sullivan, C. (2005) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1300/j038v11n03_02 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Functional foods from the perspective of the consumer: How to make it a success?
Bleiel, J. (2010) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.11.009 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Exerting Self‐Control ≠ Sacrificing Pleasure
Vosgerau, J., Scopelliti, I., & Huh, Y. E. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1142 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Understanding variations in the consumption of functional foods – Evidence from Croatia
Brečić, R., Gorton, M., & Barjolle, D. (2014) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-05-2012-0133 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
van der Zanden, L. D. T., van Kleef, E., de Wijk, R. A., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.016 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
van der Zanden, L. D. T., van Kleef, E., de Wijk, R. A., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2014) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422414000092 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Hartmann, C., Dohle, S., & Siegrist, M. (2015) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2015.1006223 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Scrinis, G. (2008) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980008001869 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Guido, G. (2006) · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Healthy eating habit: A role for goals, identity, and self-control?: McCarthy et al.
McCarthy, M. B., Collins, A. M., Flaherty, S. J., & McCarthy, S. N. (2017) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21021 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Stautz, K., Zupan, Z., Field, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2018) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2017.1421477 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
European consumers' acceptance of functional foods
Grunert, K. G. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05260.x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Krystallis, A., Vassallo, M., & Chryssohoidis, G. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2012.715091 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Honkanen, P., Olsen, S. O., Verplanken, B., & Tuu, H. H. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.019 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Handbook of Attitudes, Volume 1: Basic Principles
Albarracín, D., & Johnson, B. T. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315178103 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Consumer evaluation of food with nutritional benefits: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Mogendi, J. B., Steur, H. D., Gellynck, X., & Makokha, A. O. (2016) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.3109/09637486.2016.1170768 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Why do people high in self-control eat more healthily? Social cognitions as mediators
Hankonen, N., Kinnunen, M., Absetz, P., & Jallinoja, P. (2014) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9535-1 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Hagger, M. S., Hankonen, N. E., Kangro, E., Lintunen, T., Pagaduan, J. C., Polet, J., Ríes, F., & Hamilton, K. (2019) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12153 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Horwath, C. C., Hagmann, D., & Hartmann, C. (2020) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2020.101393 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Obesity, convenience and “phood”
Dixon, J., Hinde, S., & Banwell, C. L. (2006) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700610682328 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Olsen, S. O., & Tuu, H. H. (2017) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.008 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationAnnunziata, A., & Pascale, P. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.57661 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Cross-European and Functional Food-Related Consumer Segmentation for New Product Development
Sparke, K., & Menrad, K. (2009) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454440902908142 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
van der Laan, L. N., de Ridder, D. T. D., Charbonnier, L., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00184 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Exploring the Complicated Relationship Between Values and Behaviour
Cieciuch, J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_11 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Vorage, L., Wiseman, N., Graca, J., & Harris, N. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12092582 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
In control of variety. High self-control reduces the effect of variety on food consumption
Haws, K. L., & Redden, J. P. (2013) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.06.006 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Roselli, L., Cicia, G., Giudice, T. D., Cavallo, C., Vecchio, R., Carfora, V., Caso, D., Sardaro, R., Carlucci, D., & Gennaro, B. D. (2020) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2020.103940 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Lu, J. (2015) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-11-2014-0372 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Domain-specific innovativeness: A meta-analysis in business and consumer
Araujo, C. F., Ladeira, W. J., Santini, F. D. O., & Sampaio, C. H. (2016) · RAI revista de administração e inovação · doi:10.1016/j.rai.2016.03.003 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Dolničar, S., & Grün, B. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1835-0_7 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Body image dissatisfaction and health-enhancing food choices
Bimbo, F., Bonanno, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., & Viscecchia, R. (2018) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-03-2018-0157 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Potential Impact of Probiotics on Human Health: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties
Maftei, N.-M., Raileanu, C. R., Balta, A. A., Ambrose, L., Boev, M., Marin, D. B., & Lisa, E. L. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12020234 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nystrand, B. T., & Olsen, S. O.
- Affiliations
- Møreforsking (Norway) (NO)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Nystrand, Bjørn Tore
- Venue
- Journal of Functional Foods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 104736
- ISSN
- 1756-4646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3196452302
- Semantic Scholar
- a8ba00e8a5f04f319c07773f35e3bb11b8eb53ff
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 150
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Functional Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Keywords
- functional food consumption, customer segmentation, nutritional value, health values, hedonic eating, convenience orientation, consumer characteristics, marketing strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review