CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCoaching Methods and Impact

Exploring the contribution of mentoring practices to mentee learning in a Malaysian youth development programme

Open access
Lee, Kwan Meng, Eric Krauss, Steven, Suandi, Turiman, Hamzah, Azimi·2016·International Journal of Adolescence and Youth
DOI 10.1080/02673843.2013.862732
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Within the mentoring relationship, it is generally accepted that learning takes place through the sharing and transmitting of knowledge between mentor and mentee, where mentors employ practices such as coaching, facilitation, guidance and reflection on experiences. Despite the number of studies on mentoring in the context of youth development programmes, mentoring relationship processes in youth development contexts is not well understood. Few studies have examined the variety of practices used by mentors and explored their contributions to different types of mentee learning. In an attempt to better understand this relationship, an exploratory correlational study was conducted on a group of youth development programme participants from Malaysia (N = 90) to identify how various mentoring practices enhance learning. The results showed that overall, facilitation and coaching contributed the most to new learning. While coaching showed the highest contribution to skill acquisition and knowledge learning, the contribution of facilitation was mainly towards attitude learning. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02673843.2013.862732

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coaching contributed to skill acquisition and knowledge learning in a long-term mentoring program with Malaysian youth.

    “Coaching contributed to skill acquisition and knowledge learning in a long-term mentoring program with Malaysian youth [75].”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [75]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Lee, K. M., Eric Krauss, S., Suandi, T., & Hamzah, A.
Affiliations
  • International Youth Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Institute for Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Putra Infoport, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Lee, Kwan Meng
Venue
International Journal of Adolescence and Youth
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
419-432
ISSN
  • 0267-3843 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-4527
DOI
10.1080/02673843.2013.862732
OpenAlex
W2070868541
Cited by
5
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Adolescence and Youth (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
Keywords
mentoring practices, youth development programs, coaching, facilitation, knowledge transfer, skill acquisition, attitude learning, mentoring relationships, Malaysian youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review