The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: A review
Abstract
This review's primary objective is to identify research examining the impact of rest breaks uponaccident risk in industrial settings. In the absence of much directly relevant research, the focus isbroadened to consider the impact of rest breaks upon performance and fatige, as well asepidemioogical evidence, in both transport and non-transport settings. Relevant studies are identifiedfrom a range of electronic sources. In general, regular rest breaks can be an effective means ofmaintaining performance, managing fatigue and controlling the accumulation of risk over prolongedtask perfonmance. While two-hourly breaks are common in many industrial settings, the scheduling ofadditional micro-breaks can be beneficial under at least some circumstances. While some evidencesupports allowing workers to take rest breaks that coincide with periods of heightened fatigue,workers sometims fail to take adequate breaks when they are needed. There is little hard evidenceconcerning the optimun length of rest breaks (other than for heavy physical work), or to support thecontention that increased rest-breaks can off-set the negative inpact of extending shift durations, or tosuggest that rest breaks counteract the neptive impacts of circadian variations in alertness, unless theyinvolve taking a nap or caffeine. The scarcity of epidemiological evidence in this area highlights theneed for more research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geurts, S. A., & Sonnentag, S. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1053 · Cited by 853
Work‐related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Sonnentag, S., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.760 · Cited by 318
After Depletion: The Replenishment of the Self's Regulatory Resources
Tyler, J. M., & Burns, K. C. (2008) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860701799997 · Cited by 263
Modeling the impact of the components of long work hours on injuries and “accidents”
Folkard, S., & Lombardi, D. A. (2006) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.20307 · Cited by 262
impact of supplementary short rest breaks on task performance – A meta-analysis
Wendsche, J., Lohmann-Haislah, A., & Wegge, J. (2016) · sozialpolitik ch · doi:10.18753/2297-8224-75 · Cited by 51
“Future studies need to examine these variables as moderators as they might additionally influence recovery processes (Trougakos/Hideg 2009; Tucker 2003).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker, P.
- Venue
- Work & Stress
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-137
- ISSN
- 0267-8373 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5335
- OpenAlex
- W2010695153
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0267837031000155949
- The paper
- Tucker, P. (2003). The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: A review. Work & Stress. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267837031000155949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.