CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 246Workplace Health and Well-beingWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voluntary or involuntary? Control over overtime and rewards for overtime in relation to fatigue and work satisfaction

Beckers, Debby G.J., van der Linden, Dimitri, Smulders, Peter G.W., Kompier, Michiel A.J., Taris, Toon W., Geurts, Sabine A.E.·2008·Work & Stress
DOI 10.1080/02678370801984927
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether the relationship between overtime and well-being is influenced by the voluntary vs. involuntary (i.e., compulsory) nature of overtime work and by the presence or absence of rewards for overtime. We also explored the prevalence of these types of overtime and how they were related to work and personal characteristics. A survey was conducted among a representative sample of Dutch full-time employees (N=1612). AN(C)OVA was used to compare rewarded and unrewarded, voluntary and involuntary overtime workers on personal and work characteristics, fatigue, and work satisfaction. Most overtime workers were rewarded (62%). About half of the sample (n=814) could be classified as either voluntary or involuntary overtime workers, or as having “mixed reasons” to work overtime. Voluntary and unrewarded overtime workers had a relatively high income and favourable job characteristics. Involuntary overtime work was associated with relatively high fatigue and low satisfaction, especially for involuntary overtime workers without rewards who can be considered a burnout risk group. Voluntary overtime workers were non-fatigued and satisfied, even without rewards. It can be concluded that control over overtime and rewards for overtime are important for well-being. Moderate overtime work may not be a problem if it is done voluntarily. Moreover, the negative effects of compulsory overtime work may be partly offset by fair compensation for the extra work.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02678370801984927

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bakhuys-Roozeboom , M. , De Vroome , E. , Smulders , P. and Van den Bossche , S. 2007 . Trends in de arbeid in Nederland tussen 2000 en 2004 [Trends in work in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2004] , Hoofddorp : TNO Work & Employment .
  2. Karasek , R.A. , Pieper , C.F. and Schwartz , J.E. 1985 . Job Content Questionnaire and user's guide. Revision 1.1 , Los Angeles, CA : USC-LA .
  3. Kodz , J. , Davis , S. , Lain , D. , Strebler , M. , Rick , J. , Bates , P. , et al. 2003 . Working long hours: a review of the evidence: Vol. 1. Main report (Employment relations research series, No. 16) . The Institute for Employment Studies . London : Department of Trade and Industry .
  4. Schaufeli , W. and Van Dierendonck , D. 2000 . UBOS Utrechtse Burnout Schaal: Handleiding [Manual of the Utrecht Burnout Scale] , Lisse : Swets & Zeitlinger .
  5. Smulders , P.G.W. , Andries , F. , & Otten , F. 2001 . Hoe denken Nederlanders over hun werk…? Opzet, kwaliteit en eerste resultaten van de TNO Arbeidssituatie Survey [What do the Dutch think of their work…? Design, quality, and first results of the TNO Work Situation Survey] . Heerhugowaard : Plantijn Casparie .
  6. 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.465 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 246

Related

Metadata

Authors
Beckers, D. G. J., van der Linden, D., Smulders, P. G. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Taris, T. W., & Geurts, S. A. E.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen, Behavioural Science Institute
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Beckers, Debby G.J.
ORCID
Venue
Work & Stress
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
33-50
ISSN
  • 0267-8373 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5335
DOI
10.1080/02678370801984927
OpenAlex
W2100401310
Cited by
246
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work & Stress (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
overtime, fatigue, job satisfaction, burnout, employee well-being, job characteristics, full-time employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review