Cited by 258Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-beingEmployee Performance and Leadership

Transformational leadership and optimal functioning at work: On the mediating role of employees' perceived job characteristics and motivation

Fernet, Claude, Trépanier, Sarah-Geneviève, Austin, Stéphanie, Gagné, Marylène, Forest, Jacques·2015·Work & Stress

Abstract

This study aimed to deepen our understanding of the motivational mechanisms involved in the relationship between transformational leadership (TFL) and employee functioning. Drawing on the TFL literature, the job demands–resources model and self-determination theory, we propose an integrative model that relates TFL to employee psychological health (burnout and psychological distress), attitudes (occupational commitment and turnover intention) and performance (professional efficacy, self-reported individual and objective organizational performance) through two explanatory mechanisms: perceived job characteristics (job demands and resources) and employee motivation (autonomous and controlled). This research was conducted in two occupational settings (nurses and school principals), using a distinct variable operationalization for each. Results of both studies provide support for the hypothesized model, suggesting that TFL relates to optimal job functioning (psychological health, job attitudes and performance) by contributing to favourable perceptions of job characteristics (more resources and less demands) and high-quality work motivation (more autonomous motivation and less controlled motivation) in employees. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications as well as directions for future research are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02678373.2014.1003998

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fernet et al. (2015) showed that only job resources were associated with higher autonomous motivation, whereas job demands were associated with higher controlled motivation.

    “On the one hand, Fernet et al. (2015) showed that only job resources were associated with higher levels of autonomous motivation whereas job demands were associated with higher levels of controlled motivation.”
  • The four outcomes (turnover intentions, work performance, presenteeism, absenteeism) show differentiated relations with employees' levels of autonomous and controlled motivation.

    “These four outcomes were retained based on previously reported evidence showing that they all present differentiated relations with employees' levels of autonomous and controlled motivations (e.g., Fernet, Trépanier, Austin, Gagné, & Forest, 2015;Gagné et al., 2015).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 258

Authors
Fernet, C., Trépanier, S.-G., Austin, S., Gagné, M., & Forest, J.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Fernet, Claude
Venue
Work & Stress
Published
2015-01-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
11-31
ISSN
  • 0267-8373 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5335
OpenAlex
W2082706478
Cited by
258
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8
FWCI
18.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work & Stress (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
transformational leadership, job characteristics, employee motivation, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, burnout, psychological distress, occupational commitment, turnover intention, professional efficacy, organizational performance, job demands-resources model, self-determination theory, nurses, school principals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review