Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant

Lee, Terence·1998·Work & Stress

Abstract

This paper describes a detailed survey of attitudes towards safety at the Sellafield site of British Nuclear Fuels in Cumbria. Focus groups were held to elicit safety-relevant beliefs, attitudes and values, and the material was incorporated into a 172-item questionnaire administered as part of the monthly team briefings, and preceded by an explanatory video. Data were collected in this survey from 5296 participants. The questions covered nine domains of safety, i.e. safety procedures, risks, job satisfaction, safety rules, participation, training, control, and design of plant. Each domain was analysed by principal components analysis and 38 factors were extracted. The 19 accounting for most variance were analysed. Factor scores were validated against reported number of lost-time accidents and most discriminated at high levels of significance. Various methods for analysing the data are described. Results were compared with a ‘generic’ analysis of the whole data set, which produced 42 factors. These were then processed by secondary factor analysis, but the results of both methods showed the original ‘domain’ analysis to be superior. A reduced version with 81 items performed as well as the original and a considerable improvement in validity was obtained by using discriminant function coefficients to weight items in regression scores in place of factor loadings. The data were analysed and feedback was provided for relevant subgroups, i.e. gender, age, length of service, active area involvement, days/shifts, departments, general type of work and eight specific job types.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02678379808256863

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Lee, T.
Venue
Work & Stress
Published
1998-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
217-237
ISSN
  • 0267-8373 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5335
OpenAlex
W2010825290
Cited by
230
References
1
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02678379808256863
The paper
Lee, T. (1998). Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant. Work & Stress. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.