The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pervasive, lifestyle‐integrated mobile learning for distance learners: an analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study
Open accessAbstract
This article opens with a discussion of how and why mobile learning (m‐learning) is purported to be the next step in the evolution of distance education, before looking at various perspectives on what m‐learning constitutes. It critically examines the degree to which ‘true’ m‐learning has been achieved, by offering pedagogical value beyond the mere use of mobile devices to deliver e‐learning content. The authors argue that podcasting, in combination with a variety of portable MPEG Layer 3 (MP3)‐capable devices that are increasingly ubiquitous, can be used to deliver a form of m‐learning that offers a higher degree of lifestyle integration than many current ‘state of the art’ m‐learning applications, despite not being as technically complex. They present an example of a study in which podcasting was used to deliver supplementary listening material to distance learners undertaking an information technology subject. An end‐of‐semester survey yielded extremely positive feedback about uptake levels and the perceived effectiveness of the podcasts in aiding the students’ learning of the subject matter. However, it also produced interesting results on the ways the students made use of the podcasts, which deviated from the researchers’ original intentions for ‘anytime, anywhere, any device’ learning. The results are discussed in the light of possible influencing factors, supported by follow‐up interview data. The study may have broader implications for the still nascent field of m‐learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205 · Cited by 6,023
THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION
CHANDLER, P., & SWELLER, J. (1992) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x · Cited by 767
The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments
Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf02940852 · Cited by 538
Cited by
A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture
McGarr, O. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1136 · Cited by 419
Attitude toward Enhancing Extensive Listening through Podcasts Supplementary Pack
Alshaikhi, D., & Madini, A. A. (2016) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v9n7p32 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M. J. W., & Chan, A.
- Venue
- Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-10-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-218
- ISSN
- 0268-0513 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9958
- OpenAlex
- W1575849416
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pervasive, lifestyle‐integrated mobile learning for distance learners: an analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02680510701619810
- The paper
- Lee, M. J. W., & Chan, A. (2007). Pervasive, lifestyle‐integrated mobile learning for distance learners: an analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701619810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.