Cited by 538Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovations in Educational MethodsPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments

Hembrooke, Helene, Gay, Geri·2003·Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02940852

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Hembrooke, Helene
Venue
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Published
2003-09
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
46-64
ISSN
1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156724938
Cited by
538
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
multitasking, social computing, cognitive load, student learning, communication courses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review