The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures
Open accessAbstract
This paper looks at Ofsted and particularly special measures regimes as part of a disciplinary mechanism. It examines issues such as school effectiveness theories, the increasing powers of Ofsted, and life under special measures and links it to performativity, discipline and surveillance using the metaphor of the panopticon. The change in teachers’ accountability is traced, along with the rise in the audit culture in teaching, and the increase in the power of Ofsted. The research context is a case study of a school over the period 1999–2003. During this time the school was placed into special measures and provided an opportunity to examine the effects of a key Government policy. The issues researched were Ofsted, special measures and the effects that these had on schools and teachers. The paper argues that a special measures regime is an example of panoptic discipline which I call panoptic performativity. The primary research is echoed by much of the existing research and first hand accounts of Ofsted inspections. I also locate special measures regimes in the context of Lyotard’s ‘performativity’, Foucault’s ‘normalization’, and the school effectiveness literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
D'Amico, R. (1978) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0678036169 · Cited by 19,439
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
Zukin, S., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2077073 · Cited by 15,361
The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge
Lyotard, J.-F., Bennington, G., & Massumi, B. (1984) · Poetics Today · doi:10.2307/1772278 · Cited by 14,728
The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity
Ball, S. J. (2003) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065 · Cited by 4,829
Foucault, M. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203406373 · Cited by 3,740
The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception.
Loudon, J. B., Foucault, M., & Smith, A. M. S. (1974) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800095 · Cited by 3,466
Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: a Review of School Effectiveness Research
Sammons, P. (1997) · Cited by 801
Neave, G. (1988) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.2307/1502961 · Cited by 547
Understanding Educational Research
(1996) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203287941 · Cited by 354
School Effectiveness for Whom?
(2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203209257 · Cited by 307
Cited by
Teacher job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics
Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247 · Cited by 911
Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time
Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004 · Cited by 228
‘A Tipping Point’ in Teacher Retention and Accountability: The Case of Inspection
Perryman, J., Bradbury, A., Calvert, G., & Kilian, K. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00071005.2024.2439791 · Cited by 22
Self-citationHolloway, J., & Lewis, S. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221137553 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Perryman, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Education Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-161
- ISSN
- 0268-0939 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5106
- OpenAlex
- W1972504361
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 20.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02680930500500138
- The paper
- Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.