Cited by 228Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Reciprocal relations between students’ academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time

Open access
Putwain, David W., Becker, Sandra, Symes, Wendy, Pekrun, Reinhard·2018·Learning and Instruction

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Literature showing that emotions and academic achievement also form reciprocal relationships over time has recently emerged.

    “Literature showing that emotions and academic achievement also form reciprocal relationships over time has recently emerged (Putwain et al., 2018).”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Putwain et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7 th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  2. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P (2011). Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Putwain, David W.
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
54
Pages
73-81
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2753873597
Cited by
228
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 4
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
student enjoyment, academic boredom, achievement emotions, academic performance, reciprocal effects, control-value theory, mathematics achievement, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review