The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Don't Farmers Use Cell Phones to Access Market Prices? Technology Affordances and Barriers to Market Information Services Adoption in Rural Kenya
Abstract
Providing smallholder farmers with agricultural information could improve economic development, by helping them to grow more crops, which they could then sell for more money. Widespread mobile phone ownership in Africa means that, for the first time, there is a realistic opportunity to deliver pertinent information to remote farmers throughout the continent. Efforts to harness the potential of mobile phones include the development of agricultural market information services (MIS) – applications that send farmers crop pricing information via short message service or SMS. These services promote economic development among some farmers in the developing world, but not yet in rural Kenya. To understand what factors impede the adoption of these services, we qualitatively studied Kenyan farmers’ mobile phone usage patterns and their interactions with MFarm, a commercially available MIS. Using affordance theory to guide our analysis, we discovered a mismatch between the design of MIS and smallholder farmers’ perceptions of their mobile phones’ communication capabilities. We use these findings to motivate a design agenda that encourages software developers and development practitioners to adopt an ecological perspective when creating mobile applications for sub-Saharan Africa's rural farmers. Strategies for implementing this approach include reconsidering the design of mobile phones, and developing innovative educational interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Norman, D. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,374
Sampling for qualitative research
Marshall, M. N. (1996) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 · Cited by 4,293
Gaver, W. W. (1991) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Reaching through technology - CHI '91 · doi:10.1145/108844.108856 · Cited by 1,536 · cited 1×
“There is general agreement among researchers that women’s lower levels of literacy and education are primary factors limiting their economic development and contributing to the gender digital divide (Geldof, 2011; Stromquist, 1992).”
BackgroundResearch Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A Review of the Literature
Donner, J. (2008) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240802019970 · Cited by 743
Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception
Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p080125 · Cited by 661
Impact of SMS-Based Agricultural Information on Indian Farmers
Fafchamps, M., & Minten, B. (2012) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/lhr056 · Cited by 423
(2010) · Design Management Journal (Former Series) · doi:10.1111/(issn)1948-7177 · Cited by 401
Cited by
(2018) · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174147 · Cited by 39
Peer learning and technology adoption in a digital farmer-to-farmer network
Lasdun, V., Harou, A. P., Magomba, C., & Guereña, D. (2025) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103496 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Wyche, S., & Steinfield, C.
- Venue
- Information Technology for Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-05-28
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 320-333
- ISSN
- 0268-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-0170
- OpenAlex
- W1494409209
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 39.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Don't Farmers Use Cell Phones to Access Market Prices? Technology Affordances and Barriers to Market Information Services Adoption in Rural Kenya. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02681102.2015.1048184
- The paper
- Wyche, S., & Steinfield, C. (2016). Why Don't Farmers Use Cell Phones to Access Market Prices? Technology Affordances and Barriers to Market Information Services Adoption in Rural Kenya. Information Technology for Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1048184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.