The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complicated grief treatment: The theory, practice and outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Many people resist the notion that grief could be considered a mental disorder, but the depth of some bereaved people's distress can mean they experience very great difficulty in progressing through the natural healing process. This article outlines an attachment theory perspective on the concept of complicated grief and a research-validated treatment (complicated grief therapy) that has been found to be effective in helping people address impediments that keep them from integrating the new reality of their lives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This module was based on and inspired by the complicated grief treatment developed by Shear (2010).”
From Investigating the potential of a novel internet-based cognitive behavioural intervention for Dari and Farsi speaking refugee youth: A feasibility study (2022) · cites this paper as Shear (2010)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · Cited by 3,325
Attachment and Loss: Vol.3: Loss : Sadness and Depression
Bowlby, J. (1980) · Cited by 2,650
THE DUAL PROCESS MODEL OF COPING WITH BEREAVEMENT: RATIONALE AND DESCRIPTION
Schut, M. S. (1999) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/074811899201046 · Cited by 2,560 · cited 2×
“Stroebe and Schut (1999) focused on the multiplicity of stressors entailed in bereavement and proposed the usefulness of an oscillating ‘dual process’ coping approach to loss and restoration-related stressors.”
BackgroundThe Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning
Mundt, J. C., Marks, I. M., Shear, M. K., & Greist, J. M. (2002) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 · Cited by 2,515
Self-citationMikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Pereg, D. (2003) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1024515519160 · Cited by 1,962
Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11
Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., Raphael, B., Marwit, S. J., Wortman, C., Neimeyer, R. A., et al. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121 · Cited by 1,863
Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss.
Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. K., Reynolds, C. F., Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T., Fasiczka, A., Frank, E., Doman, J., & Miller, M. (1995) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2 · Cited by 1,582
Bowlby, J. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,303
Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life
(1976) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(76)90065-9 · Cited by 1,241
Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5
Shear, M. K., Simon, N. M., Wall, M. M., Zisook, S., Neimeyer, R. A., Duan, N., Reynolds, C. F., Lebowitz, B. D., Sung, S. C., Ghesquiere, A., et al. (2011) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20780 · Cited by 1,121
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Shear MK, Depression and Anxiety
- Weissman M, 2000, Comprehensive guide to interpersonal psychotherapy for depression
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
Hochstatter, K. R., Johnson, H., Brown, M., Gryczynski, J., Nadel, T., & Graham, J. K. (2026) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-026-01482-2
Grief Therapy for Children and Adolescents: Developmental and Multidimensional Approaches
Lopez, P., Caro, A., & Layne, C. M. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29009-1.00100-1
Can Deathbots Facilitate Ambiguity Closure for Bereaved People?
Lancaster, K. (2026) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2026.100181
Ritter, K. M., & Stompe, T. (2026) · Trauma and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.46439/trauma.3.009
Metadata
- Authors
- Shear, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shear, M Katherine
- ORCID
- Shear, M Katherine
- Venue
- Bereavement Care
- Publisher
- Cruse Bereavement Care
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 10-14
- ISSN
- 0268-2621 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8279
- PMC
- PMC3156458
- OpenAlex
- W1592611204
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Bereavement Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070741, R01MH060783)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- complicated grief, attachment theory, bereavement, grief healing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review