The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abnormalities of connected speech in semantic dementia vs Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
Background: Neurodegenerative syndromes are associated with varying degrees of language impairment. Connected speech analysis provides the most realistic measure of language function but its use has been restricted by operational constraints. Aims: In this prospective study we assessed the relative utility of a picture description task and a semi-structured interview in exposing the language decline in semantic dementia (SD) and typical mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared to each other and to healthy volunteers. Methods & Procedures: Our cohort comprised 16 patients with a clinical diagnosis of SD, 20 with mild typical AD, and 30 healthy participants. All speech samples were recorded during a face-to-face interview and were subjected to a well-controlled quantitative analysis. Outcomes & Results: Our results suggest that (a) the picture description task is more sensitive to abnormalities in the semantic measures, whereas the interviews are better at exposing morpho-syntactic deficits; (b) circumlocution is not, as has sometimes been claimed, a salient feature of speech in SD; (c) increases in the frequency of hesitation markers and of phonological and syntactic errors are prominent features of language decline in mild AD; and (d) a 150-word interview sample is adequate to provide a realistic reflection of language impairment. Conclusions: This study compared, for the first time, the two most commonly used methods of eliciting connected speech and documented many similarities in results from the two but also some salient differences in their sensitivity to specific aspects of language deficit. In addition, although replicating some aspects such as anomia, of what is already known about the language impairments in these two conditions, the study provides novel findings for both that could help clinicians in syndromic classification of anomic speech.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We and others have observed a similar finding in previous studies, 11 , 50 , 51 in which patients with amnestic or non‐amnestic AD presentations produced more inflectional errors (e.g., “She run” instead of “She runs”) and fewer tense‐inflected verbs than HC.”
From Automatic classification of AD pathology in FTD phenotypes using natural speech (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Other reports 51 have also found that participants with the amnestic AD presentation produced more frequent inflectional errors than HC, whereas individuals with svPPA did not differ from HC.”
From Automatic classification of AD pathology in FTD phenotypes using natural speech (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6 · Cited by 5,141
Self-citationFrontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria
Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., Freedman, M., Kertesz, A., Robert, P. H., Albert, M., et al. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.6.1546 · Cited by 5,047
Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., DeKosky, S. T., Barberger-Gateau, P., Cummings, J., Delacourte, A., Galasko, D., Gauthier, S., Jicha, G., et al. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70178-3 · Cited by 4,411
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J. R. (2006) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1610 · Cited by 2,016
SEMANTIC DEMENTIA: PROGRESSIVE FLUENT APHASIA WITH TEMPORAL LOBE ATROPHY
HODGES, J. R., PATTERSON, K., OXBURY, S., & FUNNELL, E. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.6.1783 · Cited by 1,710
Self-citationCognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia
Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10825 · Cited by 1,657
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Szczepkowski, K. V., & Demakis, G. J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1034 · Cited by 1,085
Grammatical structures written at three grade levels
Hunt, K. W. (1965) · Cited by 996
Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia
Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Garrard, P., & Hodges, J. R. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00034-8 · Cited by 884
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Berndt , R. S. W. S. , Rochon , E. , Saffran , E. M. and Schwartz , M. 2000 . Quantitative production analysis: A training manual for the analysis of aphasic sentence production , Hove , , UK : Psychology Press .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linguistic Features Identify Alzheimer’s Disease in Narrative Speech
Fraser, K. C., Meltzer, J. A., & Rudzicz, F. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-150520 · Cited by 797
Connected Speech in Neurodegenerative Language Disorders: A Review
Boschi, V., Catricalà, E., Consonni, M., Chesi, C., Moro, A., & Cappa, S. F. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00269 · Cited by 362
Mueller, K. D., Hermann, B., Mecollari, J., & Turkstra, L. S. (2018) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2018.1446513 · Cited by 336
Automated classification of primary progressive aphasia subtypes from narrative speech transcripts
Fraser, K. C., Meltzer, J. A., Graham, N. L., Leonard, C., Hirst, G., Black, S. E., & Rochon, E. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.006 · Cited by 229
Mueller, K. D., Koscik, R. L., Hermann, B. P., Johnson, S. C., & Turkstra, L. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00437 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Sajjadi, S. A., Patterson, K., Tomek, M., & Nestor, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nestor, Peter J.
- Venue
- Aphasiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-02-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 847-866
- ISSN
- 0268-7038 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5041
- OpenAlex
- W2085275087
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aphasiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- semantic dementia, Alzheimer's disease, connected speech, picture description task, semi-structured interviews, language loss, periphrasis, hesitation markers, phonological errors, syntactic errors, anomia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
