Cited by 72Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and Disorders

Severity of Alzheimer’s disease and language features in picture descriptions

Kavé, Gitit, Dassa, Ayelet·2018·Aphasiology

Abstract

Background: Studies of connected speech of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) report significant impairments relative to the language of cognitively intact participants. Considerably less research has focused on the association between dementia severity and language features.Aims: The current study examines how scores on a dementia screening test (the Mini-Mental Status Examination, MMSE) correlate with features of connected speech.Methods & Procedures: Thirty-five individuals with AD (range of MMSE scores = 3–25) and 35 cognitively intact participants provided picture descriptions. Ten language features were derived from their descriptions using an automated text analysis tool: total word number, percentage of content words, pronoun ratio, type-token ratio, mean word frequency, percentage of verbs, percentage of verbs in the most common morphological form in Hebrew, percentage of verbs in present tense, percentage of prepositions, and percentage of subordination markers. Information content was also analysed.Outcomes & Results: Group differences emerged in five language features as well as in information content, attesting for substantial lexical impairment in AD. Within the AD group, MMSE scores were correlated with type-token ratio, with mean word frequency, and with the number of information units. No equivalent correlations were found within the control group.Conclusions: Dementia severity associates with decreasing lexical diversity, increasing word frequency, and a reduction in relevant information content, but not with changes in grammatical features of language. A simple automated analysis of connected speech could be used clinically to define and track the decline in language abilities in AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02687038.2017.1303441

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with amnestic AD presentation produce an abundance of generic words, circumlocutions, and few content units.

    “Previous studies have shown that individuals with amnestic AD presentation produce an abundance of generic words, circumlocutions, and few content units.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavé, G., & Dassa, A.
Affiliations
  • Open University of Israel (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Kavé, Gitit
Venue
Aphasiology
Published
2017-03-16
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
27-40
ISSN
  • 0268-7038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5041
OpenAlex
W2595910252
Cited by
72
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aphasiology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute of Gerontology and Human Development
  • ESHEL-The Association for the Planning and Development of Services for the Aged in Israel
  • Paulina and Hans Graubard foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia severity, picture description, connected speech, lexical diversity, type-token ratio, word frequency, information content, grammatical features, Mini-Mental State Examination, computational text analysis, Hebrew language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review