Cited by 124Computational Geometry and Mesh GenerationComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsMobile Ad Hoc Networks

Line-of-sight communication on terrain models

De Floriani, Leila, Marzano, Paola, Puppo, Enrico·1994·International journal of geographical information systems

Abstract

Line-of-sight communication on topographic surfaces has relevance for several applications of Geographical Information Systems. In this paper, we study the problem of linking a set of transceiver stations in a visibility-connected communication network, by placing a minimum number of relays on the terrain surface. The problem is studied in the framework of a discrete visibility model, where the mutual visibility of a finite set of sites on the terrain is represented through a graph, called the visibility graph. While in the special case of only two transceivers an optimal solution can be found in polynomial time, by computing a minimum path on the visibility graph, the general problem is equivalent to a Steiner problem on the visibility graph, and, thus, it is untractable in practice. In the latter case, we propose a practical approximate solution based on a Steiner heuristic. For both the special and the general case, we propose both a static and a dynamic algorithm that allow computation of a solution, and we show experimental results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02693799408902004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • De Floriani et al (1994) propose a visibility graph identical in structure to the one proposed here.

    “De Floriani et al (1994) propose such a form of graph, a visibility graph, which is identical in structure to that which we propose here, albeit to solve the problem of transmitter placement rather than analysis of the underlying landscape properties and thus their approach is very different.”

    From From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space (2001) · cites this paper as De Floriani et al (1994)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Floriani, L., Marzano, P., & Puppo, E.
Affiliations
University of Genoa (IT)
Venue
International journal of geographical information systems
Published
1994-07
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
329-342
ISSN
0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059987823
Cited by
124
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geographical Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Keywords
line-of-sight communication, terrain models, visibility graph, relay placement, Steiner tree problem, approximate algorithms, dynamic algorithms, computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review