Line-of-sight communication on terrain models
Abstract
Line-of-sight communication on topographic surfaces has relevance for several applications of Geographical Information Systems. In this paper, we study the problem of linking a set of transceiver stations in a visibility-connected communication network, by placing a minimum number of relays on the terrain surface. The problem is studied in the framework of a discrete visibility model, where the mutual visibility of a finite set of sites on the terrain is represented through a graph, called the visibility graph. While in the special case of only two transceivers an optimal solution can be found in polynomial time, by computing a minimum path on the visibility graph, the general problem is equivalent to a Steiner problem on the visibility graph, and, thus, it is untractable in practice. In the latter case, we propose a practical approximate solution based on a Steiner heuristic. For both the special and the general case, we propose both a static and a dynamic algorithm that allow computation of a solution, and we show experimental results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
De Floriani et al (1994) propose a visibility graph identical in structure to the one proposed here.
“De Floriani et al (1994) propose such a form of graph, a visibility graph, which is identical in structure to that which we propose here, albeit to solve the problem of transmitter placement rather than analysis of the underlying landscape properties and thus their approach is very different.”
From From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space (2001) · cites this paper as De Floriani et al (1994)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b2684 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
- Authors
- De Floriani, L., Marzano, P., & Puppo, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Genoa (IT)
- ORCID
- Puppo, Enrico
- Venue
- International journal of geographical information systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 329-342
- ISSN
- 0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059987823
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geographical Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
- Keywords
- line-of-sight communication, terrain models, visibility graph, relay placement, Steiner tree problem, approximate algorithms, dynamic algorithms, computational complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review