The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community reintegration following acquired brain injury
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the interventions and strategies used to enable transition from acute care or post-acute rehabilitation to the community following brain injury. Methods and main outcomes A systematic review of the literature from 1980-2005 was conducted focusing on ABI rehabilitation. Five major aspects of community reintegration, including: independence and social integration, caregiver burden, satisfaction with quality of life, productivity and return to driving were considered. Results With the exception of one, the majority of interventions are supported by only limited evidence, denoting an absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the literature. Of 38 studies evaluated for this review, only one RCT was found. That RCT provided moderate evidence that behavioural management, coupled with caregiver education, did not help to improve caregiver burden. Conclusions Further research, using an interventional approach, is required to advance the evidence base of reintegration into the community following brain injury.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“especially for social reintegration (McCabe et al., 2007)”
From Moving ahead: A new centre of research excellence in brain recovery, focusing on psychosocial reintegration following traumatic brain injury (2012) · cites this paper as McCabe et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)
Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Sherrington, C., & Maher, C. G. (2002) · Australian Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60281-6 · Cited by 911 · cited 1×
“For randomized controlled trials, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) rating scale [9] developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Physiotherapy (CEBP) in Australia and the scale developed by Downs and Black [10] were used.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- Jacobs HE, 1993, Behavior analysis guidelines and brain injury rehabilitation: People, principles, and programs
- 10.1097/00001199-199906000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-199904000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/02699059509008224 · DOI
- Rice-Oxley M, 1999, Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 7, 10.1191/026921599668051623 · DOI
- Teasell RW, 2005, Evidence based review of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. 1st
- Teasell R, 2007, Brain Injury, 21, 107, 10.1080/02699050701201524 · DOI
- Johnson K, 1998, Behavior Modifications, 22, 502, 10.1177/01454455980224004 · DOI
- 10.1080/026990598122494 · DOI
- 10.3109/02699058909004550 · DOI
- 10.3109/02699059309008153 · DOI
- Johnston MV, 1991, Brain Injury, 5, 141, 10.3109/02699059109008085 · DOI
- 10.5014/ajot.51.4.256 · DOI
- 10.1080/165019702760279198 · DOI
- Goranson TE, 2003, Brain Injury, 17, 759, 10.1080/0269905031000088513 · DOI
- 10.3109/02699059409150995 · DOI
- 10.1080/0269905031000110391 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-200204000-00004 · DOI
- 10.3109/02699059409150974 · DOI
- 10.1080/026990598122700 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.48.9.870 · DOI
- 10.3109/02699058909029637 · DOI
- 10.1080/026990598122205 · DOI
- Livingstone MG, 1988, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 6, 10.1097/00001199-198812000-00004 · DOI
- Del Orto AE, 2000, Brain injury and the family: A life and living perspective 2nd
- Katz S, 2005, Brain Injury, 19, 59, 10.1080/02699050410001719970 · DOI
- 10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.267 · DOI
- Thomsen IV, 1974, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine, 6, 180
- 10.1136/jnnp.47.3.260 · DOI
- Martin DA, 1988, Journal of Learning Disability, 21, 464, 10.1177/002221948802100803 · DOI
- Wade SL, 1998, Pediatrics, 102, 110, 10.1542/peds.102.1.110 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-200204000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-200204000-00002 · DOI
- Mailhan L, 2005, Brain Injury, 19, 227, 10.1080/02699050410001720149 · DOI
- Trombly CA, 1998, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 810, 10.5014/ajot.52.10.810 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.019 · DOI
- Armengol CG, 1999, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14, 233, 10.1097/00001199-199906000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540140087018 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90252-5 · DOI
- 10.3109/02699059209029665 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-200112000-00003 · DOI
- Tennant A, 1995, Brain Injury, 9, 595, 10.3109/02699059509008218 · DOI
- Parente R, 1999, Neuro Rehabilitation, 13, 13
- 10.1097/00001199-198703000-00007 · DOI
- O’Reilly MF, 2000, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 187, 10.3233/JVR-2000-00082 · DOI
- 10.1080/026990598122692 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-199403000-00011 · DOI
- Buffington ALH, 1997, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12, 1, 10.1097/00001199-199710000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050400017163 · DOI
- van Zomeren AH, 1987, Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 68, 697
- Perino C, 1997, Giornale Italinao di Medicine e Rehabilitazione, 1, 53
- Leon-Carrion J, 2005, Brain Injury, 19, 213, 10.1080/02699050400017205 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050400017197 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.phm.0000202106.01654.61 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-199806000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050210128906 · DOI
- 10.1080/0269905031000070143 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050010005968 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90045-4 · DOI
- Gamble D, 2003, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 47, 10.3233/JVR-2003-00201 · DOI
- De Kort AC, 2002, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 25, 271, 10.1097/00004356-200212000-00004 · DOI
- Wehman P, 1988, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 82, 10.1097/00001199-198812000-00012 · DOI
- 10.5014/ajot.57.2.177 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699050400017171 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
Degeneffe, C., Green, R., & Jones, C. (2016) · Rehabilitation Research Policy and Education · doi:10.1891/2168-6653.30.4.421 · Cited by 2
“This study further advances the limited research (McCabe et al., 2007) regarding how acute-care settings best facilitate community RRPE30-4_PTR_A6_421-428.indd 426 10/22/16 10:16 AM Greenwald, B. D. (2010).”
BackgroundLevert, M., Lefebvre, H., Gélinas, I., McKerral, M., Roy, O., & Proulx, M. (2016) · Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement · doi:10.1017/s0714980816000180 · Cited by 3
“…un TCC, mais aussi, pour l’ensemble des aînés qui, à la suite d’un accident ou d’un problème de santé ayant nécessité une hospitalisation ou une réadaptation, souhaitent par la suite pouvoir de nouveau concrétiser leurs projets de vie (Bourque, 2005 ; Lefebvre et al., 2013 ; McCabe et al., 2007 ).”
BackgroundPredictors of participation over the 10 years after TBI in black individuals
Ohayagha, C., Xia, B., Jones, S., Klyce, D. W., Arango-Lasprilla, J., & Perrin, P. B. (2025) · NeuroRehabilitation (Reading, MA) · doi:10.1177/10538135251315372 · Cited by 1
“While participation is regarded as one of the most important rehabilitation outcomes after TBI (McCabe et al., 2007; Salter et al., 2008), disparities in participation have been shown in individuals from racially/ethnically minoritized groups (Arango-Lasprilla et al., 2007, 2008; Gary et al., 2009;…”
Lefebvre, H., & Levert, M. (2022) · Développement Humain Handicap et Changement Social · doi:10.7202/1086815ar · Cited by 1
Gifre, M., Gil, Á. C., Plà, L., Roig-Rovira, T., & Monreal‐Bosch, P. (2015) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.02.002 · Cited by 3
Kotzur, C., Harrington, R., Patterson, F., & Froude, E. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2477829
“Despite recognition that successful community reintegration should be the ultimate goal of brain injury services [3], effective services to support the unique challenges of community reintegration and quality of life for community-dwellers with ABI are limited [6,7].”
Organizational characteristics of Brain Injury Clubhouse Model programs
McKay, C. E., Seel, R., Young, J. A., & Johnson, C. (2022) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2022.2033835
Perceived Strengths and Needs After Rehabilitation in Community-Dwelling Adults With Chronic Stroke
Jaber, A., Radel, J., & Sabata, D. (2017) · doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.71s1-po4135
Mitrushina, M., & Tomaszewski, R. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2016.1152609
Family members’ needs and experiences related to driving disruption following acquired brain injury
Liang, P. (2016) · The University of Queensland · doi:10.14264/uql.2016.953
Beyond Embodied Cognition: Intentionality, Affordance, and Environmental Adaptation
Jin, Z., Tirassa, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2019) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-88945-815-8
McIntyre, M. (2016) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/1166
“Ongoing challenges relating to community integration and psychological adjustment make everyday life following TBI more complex (Fuchs, Crawford, & Milders, 2003; McCabe et al., 2007).”
BackgroundI postumi della grave cerebrolesione acquisita: esiti comportamentali
Cattelani, R., Zettin, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2349-9_12
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, P., Lippert, C., Weiser, M., Hilditch, M., Hartridge, C., & Villamere, J.
- Affiliations
- St Joseph's Health Care (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McCabe, Pat
- ORCID
- Lippert, Corbin
- Venue
- Brain Injury
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-257
- ISSN
- 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-301X
- OpenAlex
- W2074931828
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- acquired brain injury, community reintegration, post-acute rehabilitation, caregiver burden, social integration, quality of life, return to driving, productivity, behavior management, caregiver education
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Quality of Life, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Social Adjustment, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Community Networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
