Cited by 48Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) multicentre study interim analysis: Differences between participants with positive versus negative mild TBI histories

Walker, William C., Hirsch, Shawn, Carne, William, Nolen, Tracy, Cifu, David X., Wilde, Elisabeth A., Levin, Harvey S., Brearly, Timothy W. +2 more·2018·Brain Injury

Abstract

Objectives Compare characteristics and outcomes of combat-exposed military personnel with positive versus negative mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) histories. Setting Recruitment was from registration lists and ambulatory clinics at four veterans administration hospitals. Participants Consented veterans and service members completing initial evaluation by September 2016 (n = 492). Design Observational with cross-sectional analyses. Main measures Multimodal assessments including structured interviews, record review, questionnaires, neuroendocrine labs and neurocognitive and sensorimotor performance. Results In unadjusted comparisons to those absent lifetime mTBI, the mTBI positive group (84%) had greater combat exposure, more potential concussive events, less social support and more comorbidities, including asthma, sleeping problems and post-traumatic stress disorder. They also fared worse on all sensory and pain symptom scores and self-reported functional and global outcomes. They had poorer scores on Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV coding (processing speed), TMT-B (visual-motor integration and executive function) and two posturography subtests, but were otherwise equal to TBI negative participants on neurocognitive and sensorimotor testing and neuroendocrine levels. Conclusions Although differences in characteristics exist which were not adjusted for, participants with historical mTBI have greater symptomatology and life functioning difficulties compared with non-TBI.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699052.2018.1479041

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In comparison to TBI negative controls, individuals with remote mTBI history, especially those with repetitive mTBI, are well-documented to have greater self-reported cognitive difficulties.

    “In comparison to TBI negative controls, individuals with remote mTBI history, especially those with repetitive mTBI, are well-documented to have greater self-reported cognitive difficulties (Walker, Hirsch, et al., 2018).”

    From Can mild traumatic brain injury alter cognition chronically? A LIMBIC-CENC multicenter study. (2023) · cites this paper as Walker, Hirsch, et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, W. C., Hirsch, S., Carne, W., Nolen, T., Cifu, D. X., Wilde, E. A., Levin, H. S., Brearly, T. W., Eapen, B. C., & Williams, R.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • W. G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, William C.
Venue
Brain Injury
Published
2018-05-31
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
1079-1089
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
OpenAlex
W2806328076
Cited by
48
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) A)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (CENC Award I01 CX001135)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, combat exposure, military personnel, veterans, social support, post-traumatic stress disorder, comorbidities, neuropsychological performance, processing speed, executive function, postural control, sensory symptoms, pain symptoms, functional outcome
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Concussion, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Neurologic Examination, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Veterans, Glasgow Coma Scale, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review