Cited by 22Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesCognitive Functions and Memory

Can mild traumatic brain injury alter cognition chronically? A LIMBIC-CENC multicenter study.

Open access
Walker, William C., O'Neil, Maya E., Ou, Zhining, Pogoda, Terri K., Belanger, Heather G., Scheibel, Randall S., Presson, Angela P., Miles, Shannon R. +6 more·2023·Neuropsychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While outcome from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is generally favorable, concern remains over potential negative long-term effects, including impaired cognition. This study examined the link between cognitive performance and remote mTBIs within the Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (LIMBIC-CENC) multicenter, observational study of Veterans and service members (SMs) with combat exposure. METHOD: = 256) on each of the seven cognitive domains computed by averaging Z scores of prespecified component tests. Significance levels were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Neither of the mTBI positive groups differed from the mTBI negative control group on any of the cognitive domains in multivariable analyses. Findings were also consistently negative across sensitivity analyses (e.g., mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, or years since the first and last mTBI). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the average veteran or SM who experienced one or more mTBIs does not have postacute objective cognitive deficits due to mTBIs alone. A holistic health care approach including comorbidity assessment is indicated for patients reporting chronic cognitive difficulties after mTBI(s), and strategies for addressing misattribution may be beneficial. Future study is recommended with longitudinal designs to assess within-subjects decline from potential neurodegeneration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a large multicenter sample of combat-exposed Veterans and Service Members, neither 1–2 nor 3+ lifetime mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) were associated with lower objective cognitive performance compared with mTBI-negative controls. The authors conclude that the average person with remote mTBI does not show chronic cognitive deficits attributable to mTBI alone.

Key findings

  • Among 1,310 participants passing performance validity tests, neither mTBI-positive group differed from mTBI-negative controls on any of seven cognitive domains in multivariable analyses after Holm adjustment (all adjusted p-values > .05).
  • For 1–2 lifetime mTBIs versus no mTBI, coefficients ranged from −0.09 (Attention) to 0.05 (Verbal Fluency), with all adjusted p-values = 1 except Executive Function (p = .42); for 3+ mTBIs versus no mTBI, coefficients ranged from −0.04 (Processing Speed and Executive Function) to 0.17 (Verbal Fluency), with only Verbal Fluency adjusted p = .15.
  • Sensitivity analyses using mTBI count as a continuous variable, blast-related mTBI count, and years since first/last mTBI were also consistently negative; the only raw p < .05 findings were blast-related mTBIs on Verbal Fluency (raw p = .028; adjusted p = .2) and repetitive versus non-repetitive mTBI on Verbal Fluency (raw p = .015; adjusted p = .1).
  • Age and estimated pre-exposure intellectual function were consistently associated with all seven cognitive domains (all adjusted p = .01); females performed better than males on episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor/dexterity.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the LIMBIC-CENC multicenter, prospective longitudinal observational study of current and former U.S. Service Members with combat exposure; 1,551 enrolled, 241 excluded for failing any of three performance validity tests, leaving n = 1,310.
  • Lifetime mTBI history was classified as TBI negative controls (n = 256), 1–2 lifetime mTBIs/non-repetitive (n = 614), or 3+ lifetime mTBIs/repetitive (n = 440), using structured interview and expert consensus.
  • Seven cognitive domain Z-score composites (Episodic Memory, Attention, Processing Speed, Working Memory, Executive Functioning, Verbal Fluency, Fine Motor/Dexterity) were analyzed with multivariable linear regression adjusting for demographics, estimated pre-exposure intellect, military variables, psychosocial factors, sleep, pain, and other comorbidities; Holm’s method adjusted for seven comparisons.

Limitations

  • Stated: the cross-sectional design precludes understanding later cognitive changes or within-subject decline from neurodegeneration; retrospective mTBI identification is prone to recall bias; preselected domain composites may not include the most sensitive measures; many covariates increase risk of model overfitting; findings may not generalize to civilians, non-VA care populations, or women because the sample was predominantly male and military/VA-based.
  • Evident from the text: the study cannot directly test whether a vulnerable subset experiences chronic objective cognitive changes, and it did not use longitudinal before-after data to assess cognitive decline over time.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/neu0000855

Cites

108 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

13 of 38 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    If there is cumulative brain damage from repetitive, sub-concussive, low-level blast exposures, it was not apparent on the study's cognitive testing.

    “If there is cumulative brain damage from repetitive, sub-concussive, low-level blast exposures as evidence from other evaluation techniques suggests (Belding et al., 2021; Goldstein et al., 2012; Stone et al., 2020; Tate et al., 2013), it was not apparent on our cognitive testing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Belding et al., 2021 source
    • cites Goldstein et al., 2012 source

      The Results report CTE neuropathology in veterans with blast exposure and/or concussive injury, supporting the cited point that other evaluation techniques suggest blast-related brain damage. But the veterans’ exposures included single blasts and blasts involving loss of consciousness, while the mouse model used a single blast; the paper does not establish cumulative damage from repetitive, sub-concussive, low-level blasts. The statement about 'our cognitive testing' is the citing authors’ own finding, not one attributed to Goldstein et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Stone et al., 2020 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Premisecitation

    Extant literature has demonstrated inconsistent findings on the enduring deleterious effects of blast-related mTBI versus blunt mTBI including on cognition.

    “This is important because extant literature has demonstrated inconsistent findings on the enduring deleterious effects of blast-related mTBI versus blunt mTBI including on cognition (Belanger et al., 2009; Martindale et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Belanger et al., 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Martindale et al., 2020 source
  • Findingown data

    The study found no differences in group cognitive performance for either those with non-repetitive (1-2 lifetime) or repetitive (3+ lifetime) mTBIs versus TBI negative controls.

    “Using cross-sectional analyses of a large, well-characterized sample of combat-exposed Veterans and SMs and objective neuropsychological measures, we found no differences in group cognitive performance for either those with non-repetitive (1–2 lifetime) or repetitive (3+ lifetime) mTBIs versus TBI negative controls.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusion: · plain
      “This study found no evidence that remote mTBI(s) influence objective cognitive performance among SMs and Veterans with combat exposure history who passed performance validity measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Findingown data

    Females performed better than males on three cognitive domains: episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor and dexterity.

    “Females performed better than males on three domains: episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor and dexterity.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Additionally, females scored better than males on measures of episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Findingown data

    In multivariable regression analyses adjusting for covariates and multiple comparisons, neither mTBI positive group (1-2 or 3+ lifetime mTBIs) was significantly different from the mTBI negative control group on any cognitive outcome.

    “Neither of the mTBI positive groups, 1–2 lifetime mTBIs (non-repetitive) or 3+ lifetime mTBIs (repetitive), were significantly different from the mTBI negative control group on any cognitive outcome after adjusting for covariates and multiple comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims. 32
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Objective, late cognitive deficits after mTBI have been elusive to document at the group level, with multiple meta-analytic reviews concluding insufficient evidence for deleterious effects of mTBI on objective cognitive assessment beyond the first few months post-injury.

    “In general, objective, late cognitive deficits after mTBI have been elusive to document at the group level, with multiple, meta-analytic reviews concluding insufficient evidence for deleterious effects of mTBI on objective cognitive assessment beyond the first few months post-injury”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Belanger et al., 2005 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Binder et al., 1997 source
    • cites Frencham et al., 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is emerging evidence that repeated mTBI may confer additional risk for both persisting symptoms and cognitive compromise.

    “There is emerging evidence that repeated mTBI may confer additional risk for both persisting symptoms and cognitive compromise.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Guskiewicz et al., 2003 source
    • cites Manley et al., 2017 source
    • cites Bachstetter et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The strength of correlation between the seven cognitive domains within the sample was generally moderate, with values ranging from r=0.19 to r=0.49.

    “The strength of correlation between the seven cognitive domains within our sample was generally in the ‘moderate’ range (Cohen, 1988), with values ranging from r=0.19 to r=0.49 (full results are available online in Supplemental Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, 1988 source

      The Results section discusses correlations in an analysis of religion and abortion responses, but it gives no rule classifying correlations as ‘moderate.’ Searches for moderate-correlation thresholds and for the seven cognitive domains found no relevant passage in this paper. The cited paper’s References section lists a separate 1988 Cohen book, but the paper itself does not state the classification attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Despite the common occurrence of chronic cognitive subjective symptomology after mTBI, extant research shows a lack of a consistent relationship with cognitive performance on formal neuropsychological examination, including in military samples.

    “Despite the common occurrence of chronic cognitive subjective symptomology after mTBI, extant research shows a lack of a consistent relationship with cognitive performance on formal neuropsychological examination, including samples of military personnel”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mac Donald et al., 2017 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These findings align with prior studies and provide some of the strongest evidence to date that in unselected mTBI cases, lower cognitive performance does not chronically persist relative to controls.

    “These findings align with prior studies and provide some of the strongest evidence to date that in unselected mTBI cases, lower cognitive performance does not chronically persist relative to controls (Belanger et al., 2005; Binder et al., 1997; Frencham et al., 2005; Karr et al., 2014; Rohling et al., 2011; Schretlen & Shapiro, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Belanger et al., 2005 source

      The supplied copy contains an abstract stating that unselected or prospective samples showed no residual neuropsychological impairment by three months, but no corresponding passage from the paper’s body was available. Searches for unselected samples and persistent deficits returned only the abstract and references; under the specified evidence rule, the abstract cannot establish the verdict. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Binder et al., 1997 source
    • cites Frencham et al., 2005 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PPCS are especially common among U.S. Veterans and Service Members who sustained mTBI in the post-9/11 wars, including Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn.

    “PPCS are especially common among U.S. Veterans and SMs who sustained mTBI in the post-911 wars, including Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cifu et al., 2013 source
    • cites Hendricks et al., 2013 source
    • cites Taylor et al., 2012 source

      The Introduction discusses how often mild TBI occurred among Afghanistan and Iraq veterans, while the Results and Conclusions report psychiatric diagnoses and pain among VA users diagnosed with TBI. Neither establishes how common persistent postconcussive symptoms (PPCS) are after mTBI. A PPCS study appears in the Reference List, but this paper does not report its PPCS finding; the passages also do not address Operation New Dawn. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Blast-related mTBI may have more enduring long-term effects on cognition compared to blunt mTBI, but the evidence is mixed.

    “Another factor specific to military populations with mixed research evidence is the concern that blast-related mTBI has more enduring long-term effects on cognition compared to blunt mTBI”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Belanger et al., 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Martindale et al., 2020 source

      The Discussion (page not available in our copy) says findings on blast-related versus non-blast mTBI are mixed: some studies find no cognitive difference, while others find subtle differences associated with blast exposure. The paper also raises the possibility of persisting cognitive difficulties, but it does not establish that effects of blast-related mTBI last longer than those of blunt mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The use of measures recommended as NIH NINDS TBI common data elements allows other studies to compare their results to ours.

    “Finally, the use of measures recommended as NIH NINDS TBI common data elements allows other studies to compare their results to ours (Hicks et al., 2013; Report Viewer | NINDS Common Data Elements, n.d.)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hicks et al., 2013 source
    • cites Report Viewer | NINDS Common Data Elements, n.d.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The physical and mental health symptom measure covariates showed less significance in the models than anticipated, but results were consistent with smaller studies that also measured performance validity.

    “The physical and mental health symptom measure covariates showed less significance in the models than anticipated, but results were consistent with smaller studies that also measured performance validity (Wisdom et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wisdom et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Using the original one-item measure, the only significant reduction was for verbal fluency in those with a medium level (10-89) of controlled blast exposures compared to none, but it was not significant for the high level (90+) group.

    “Using our original one-item measure, the only significant reduction was for verbal fluency in those with a medium level (10–89) of controlled blast exposures compared to none, but it was not significant for the high level (90+) group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the comparison of 1-2 mTBIs to no TBIs in multivariable models, coefficients ranged from −0.09 (Attention) to 0.05 (Verbal Fluency) and all adjusted p-values were 1 except for Executive Function (p=0.42).

    “Coefficients for the comparison of 1–2 mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.09 (Attention) to 0.05 (Verbal Fluency) and all adjusted p-values were 1 except for Executive Function (p=0.42).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The repetitive mTBI group was receiving more medication classes that might compromise cognition than TBI negative controls (p=0.003), but the mean difference (0.2) and effect size (Cohen's d=0.18) were very small.

    “The repetitive mTBI group was receiving more medication classes that might compromise cognition (p=0.003), but the mean difference (0.2) and effect size (Cohen’s d=0.18) versus the TBI negative controls were very small.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In sensitivity analyses replacing the three mTBI groups with number of mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, and time since first and last mTBI, none showed significant relationships of mTBIs with any of the seven cognitive domain outcomes after adjustment for multiple comparisons, except total number of blast-related mTBIs on Verbal Fluency (raw p=0.028; adjusted p=0.2) и

    “Similar to the primary analysis, none of these sensitivity analyses showed significant relationships of mTBIs with any of the seven cognitive domain outcomes after adjustment for multiple comparisons, with all of the adjusted p-value for mTBIs above 0.05 even before adjustment except for total number of blast-related mTBIs on Verbal Fluency (raw p=0.028; adjusted p=0.2) and repetitive versus non”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Additional sensitivity analyses also showed non-significance for all other TBI explanators examined, namely number of mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, and years since first and last mTBI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The sample's mean age at enrollment was 39.7 years and mean time since index event was 9.7 years.

    “Overall, the sample’s mean age at enrollment was 39.7 years and their mean time since index event was 9.7 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no differences across TBI groups for being on an antidepressant (p=0.24) or a cognitive-enhancing medication (p=0.28).

    “Regarding medications, there were no differences across TBI groups for being on an antidepressant (p=0.24) or a cognitive-enhancing medication (p=0.28).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For repetitive mTBI (3+ mTBIs) versus controls in univariate models, coefficients ranged from −0.17 (Fine Motor and Dexterity) to 0.18 (Verbal Fluency), and adjusted p-values ranged from p=0.06 (Verbal Fluency) to 1 (three domains).

    “Coefficients for the comparison of 3+ mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.17 (Fine Motor and Dexterity) to 0.18 (Verbal Fluency).”
    • Also stated in: § Cognitive performance across mTBI groups and their unadjusted comparisons · plain
      “For repetitive mTBI (3+ mTBIs) versus controls, p-values ranged from p=0.06 (Verbal Fluency) to 1 (three domains).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Higher estimated pre-exposure intellectual function (NIHTB-CB Picture Vocabulary test) was related to higher scores on other cognitive measures, and education level had a significant effect on four domains.

    “As also expected, higher estimated pre-exposure intellectual function (NIHTB-CB Picture Vocabulary test) was related to higher scores on other cognitive measures, and education level had a significant effect on four domains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the comparison of 3+ mTBIs to no TBIs in multivariable models, coefficients ranged from −0.04 (Processing Speed and Executive Function) to 0.17 (Verbal Fluency) and the only adjusted p-value under 1 was Verbal Fluency (adjusted p=0.15).

    “Coefficients for the comparison of 3+ mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.04 (Processing Speed and Executive Function) to 0.17 (Verbal Fluency) and the only adjusted p-value under 1 was Verbal Fluency (adjusted p=0.15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Findings were consistently negative across sensitivity analyses, including when mTBIs were modeled as a continuous variable, when blast-related mTBIs were analyzed, and when years since first and last mTBI were considered.

    “Findings were also consistently negative across sensitivity analyses (e.g., mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, or years since first and last mTBI).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The sample was predominantly male (87%), educated with at least some college or technical school (86%), had an enlisted rank (84%), and served in the Army (65%).

    “Overall, the sample was diverse racially (27% non-White) and ethnically (17% Hispanic), was predominantly male (87%), educated with at least some college or technical school (86%), had an enlisted rank (84%), and served in the Army (65%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For the non-repetitive TBI group (1-2 mTBIs) versus controls in univariate models, coefficients ranged from −0.09 (Episodic Memory and Processing Speed) to 0.02 (Verbal Fluency), and adjusted p-values ranged from p=0.09 (Executive Function) to 1 (two domains).

    “Coefficients for the comparison of 1–2 mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.09 (Episodic Memory and Processing Speed) to 0.02 (Verbal Fluency).”
    • Also stated in: § Cognitive performance across mTBI groups and their unadjusted comparisons · plain
      “For the non-repetitive TBI group (1–2 mTBIs) versus controls, adjusted p-values ranged from p=0.09 (Executive Function) to 1 (two domains).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The relationships between the seven domains in the sample showed moderate correlations, suggesting that further collapsing of domains may be possible.

    “The relationships between the seven domains in our sample showed ‘moderate’ correlations, suggesting that further collapsing of domains may be possible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For the current analyses, only baseline data were used, and participants who failed any of the three performance validity tests were excluded.

    “For the current analyses, only data collected at baseline assessment were utilized, and participants who failed any of the three tests of performance validity described further below were excluded.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For all additional sensitivity models, all GVIF values were below 2.4, indicating no evidence of multicollinearity.

    “For all of these additional models, all GVIF values were below 2.4, indicating no evidence of multicollinearity (Table S5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The literature remains inconclusive on whether repeated mTBI affects objective cognitive performance, as many studies have failed to demonstrate an effect.

    “However, the literature remains inconclusive, as many other studies have failed to demonstrate an effect of repeated mTBI on objective cognitive performance”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Belanger et al., 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Cooper et al., 2018 source
    • cites Macciocchi et al., 2001
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The study has the largest sample size to date with comprehensive neurocognitive testing in Veterans and SMs with blast-related mTBI.

    “Our study has the largest sample size to date with comprehensive neurocognitive testing in Veterans and SMs with blast-related mTBI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The strong association with lower scores as age increased was expected given the use of raw scores rather than population-normed scores to calculate sample-based Z-scores.

    “The strong association with lower scores as age increased was expected given our use of raw scores rather than population-normed scores to calculate the sample-based Z-scores.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    20% or more of patients with mTBI experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS).

    “Nevertheless, 20% or more of patients with mTBI experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lagacé-Legendre et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Key strengths of the study include the very large and ethnically and racially diverse sample, the inclusion of mTBI-negative but deployed controls, and the exclusion of cases with profiles of invalid testing.

    “Key strengths of this study include the very large and ethnically and racially diverse sample, the inclusion of mTBI-negative but deployed controls, and the exclusion of cases with profiles of invalid testing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The mTBI negative controls were recruited through the same processes as the mTBI positive participants, providing a relevant control group with similar background characteristics and experiences.

    “Notably, our mTBI negative controls were recruited through the same processes as the mTBI positive participants which provided a relevant control group with similar background characteristics and experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    There is inconclusive research regarding the risk of chronic neurocognitive decrements after a single mTBI or even repeated mTBIs.

    “Taken together, there is inconclusive research regarding the risk of chronic, neurocognitive decrements after a single mTBI or even repeated mTBIs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The negative findings do not rule out the potential for a vulnerable subset of individuals who do experience chronic objective cognitive changes after mTBI.

    “While providing an encouraging message to Veterans, SMs, and providers, these negative findings do not rule out the potential for a vulnerable subset of individuals who do experience chronic objective cognitive changes after mTBI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The parent study, including the database registry and all secondary analyses, was approved by the local Institutional Review Boards at each PLS enrollment site, and all participants provided written consent prior to any study procedures.

    “The parent study, including the database registry and all secondary analyses, was approved by the local Institutional Review Boards at each of the PLS enrollment sites. All participants provide written consent prior to any study procedures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PPCS typically include cognitive symptoms such as decreased concentration, memory, and processing speed, in addition to somatic and emotional symptoms.

    “PPCS typically include cognitive symptoms, such as decreased concentration, memory, and processing speed, in addition to somatic and emotional symptoms, such as headache, dizziness, disordered sleep, fatigue, irritability, increased arousal, and sensitivity to light and sound”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brenner et al., 2009 source
    • cites Stein & McAllister, 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People associate concussion with negative outcomes and therefore experience a type of 'diagnosis threat'.

    “This is thought to occur because people associate concussion with negative outcomes and therefore experience a type of “diagnosis threat” (Suhr & Gunstad, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Suhr & Gunstad, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Another strength was the a-priori designation of seven cognitive domain composite scores for the dependent variable and appropriately adjusting for Type 1 error.

    “Another strength was the a-priori designation of seven cognitive domain composite scores for the dependent variable and appropriately adjusting for Type 1 error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The sex-related findings are consistent with the literature in the general population, especially for episodic memory and processing speed.

    “These sex-related findings are consistent with the literature in the general population, especially for episodic memory (Asperholm et al., 2019) and processing speed (Camarata & Woodcock, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Asperholm et al., 2019 source
    • cites Camarata & Woodcock, 2006 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attributional styles are mutable and can be successfully addressed.

    “From a clinical perspective, it is important to note that attributional styles are mutable and can be successfully addressed (Peters et al., 2011) .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peters et al., 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    There was no presence of multicollinearity in any multivariable model (all GVIF < 2.4).

    “There was no presence of multicollinearity in any model (all GVIF < 2.4, full results available on-line in supplementary Table S2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study sample consists entirely of current and former military SMs who often sustained mTBI during combat deployment and/or blast-related mTBI, so the findings may not generalize well to civilians.

    “Given the LIMBIC-CENC research mission, our study sample consists entirely of current and former military SMs who often sustained mTBI during combat deployment and/or blast-related mTBI, so the findings may not generalize well to civilians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Self-reported concerns about cognitive difficulties in persons in the chronic phase following mTBI are likely best treated with a holistic approach that considers common comorbid conditions and situational factors.

    “This suggests that self-reported concerns about cognitive difficulties in persons in the chronic phase following mTBI are likely best treated with a holistic approach that considers common comorbid conditions and situational factors that could be associated with longstanding cognitive complaints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The study sample was predominantly male, so the findings may not generalize well to women.

    “Our study sample, which mirrored the broader U.S. military population in gender make up, was predominantly male, so our findings may also not generalize well to women.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The retrospective identification of historical mTBI is prone to recall bias.

    “Additionally, although we used a validated structured interview method with layers of quality assurance, the retrospective identification of historical mTBI is prone to recall bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of difference in cognitive performance may be, in part, related to benefit gained from treatment since participants had access to specialized brain injury rehabilitation services.

    “The lack of difference in cognitive performance may be, in part, related to benefit gained from treatment since our participants had access to specialized brain injury rehabilitation services in the Military and/or Veterans healthcare system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Strategies for addressing misattribution may also be beneficial.

    “Strategies for addressing misattribution may also be beneficial and further research on behavioral interventions for patients with tightly held negative beliefs on the impact of their remote concussions is also recommended.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The cross-sectional design precludes understanding of later cognitive changes which may be due to TBI or other comorbidities as well as subtle changes that may be related to other aspects of deployment.

    “Foremost is the cross-sectional design, which precludes understanding of later cognitive changes which may be due to TBI or other comorbidities as well as subtle changes that may be related to other aspects of deployment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Regression models are increasingly prone to overfitting as the number of covariates increases.

    “While our consideration of multiple potential confounders is a strength, regression models are increasingly prone to overfitting as the number of covariates increases (Babyak, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Babyak, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    It is possible the study may not have selected the most sensitive measures to capture cognitive effects.

    “Although our use of pre-selected cognitive domain composite scores sharpened our scientific rigor, it is possible we may have not selected the most sensitive measures to capture cognitive effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
48 of 48
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mTBI negative control group is comparable to the mTBI positive groups on all relevant characteristics except mTBI history after adjustment for covariates.

    “Using multivariable regression models that adjusted for covariates, including age and estimated pre-exposure intellectual function, positive mTBI history groups, 1–2 lifetime mTBIs (non-repetitive, n=614) and 3+ lifetime mTBIs (repetitive; n=440) were compared to TBI negative controls (n=256) on each of seven cognitive domains”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cross-sectional baseline cognitive performance can be used to infer the absence of chronic post-acute cognitive deficits due to mTBI.

    “This cross-sectional study analyzed data collected at the enrollment visit for the ongoing LIMBIC-CENC multicenter PLS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.

    “The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are both important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.

    “Multivariable linear regression was the primary approach for examining the conditional relationship between mTBI groups and each of the seven neurocognitive domain outcomes separately while adjusting for the covariates.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Benedict R (1997). Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. In Psychological Assessment Resources 10.1037/1040-3590.8.2.145 · DOI
  2. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, & Ober BA (2000). California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.). Psychological Corporation.
  3. DesRosiers G, & Kavanagh D (1987). Cognitive assessment in closed head injury: Stability, validity and parallel forms for two neuropsychological measures of recovery. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9(4), 162– 173.
  4. James Gareth, Witten Daniela, Hastie Trevor, and Tibshirani Robert. (2014). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
  5. Lamberty GJ, Putnam SH, Chatel DM, Bieliauskas LA, & (1994). Derived Trail Making Test indices: A preliminary report. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 7(3), 230– 234.
  6. Rolle-Lake L, & Robbins E (2020). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. In StatPearls StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553031/ 31971707
  7. Wechsler D, Coalson DL, & Raiford SE (2008). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, W. C., O'Neil, M. E., Ou, Z., Pogoda, T. K., Belanger, H. G., Scheibel, R. S., Presson, A. P., Miles, S. R., Wilde, E. A., Tate, D. F., Troyanskaya, M., Pugh, M. J., Jak, A., & Cifu, D. X.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • VA Portland Health Care System (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System (US)
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2023-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W4297998788
Cited by
22
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • US Department of Defense (W81XWH-18-PH/TBIRP-LIMBIC; W81XWH1920067; W81XWH-13-2-0095)
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX002097; I01 CX002096; I01 HX003155; I01 RX003444; I01 RX003443; I01 RX003442; I01 CX001135; I01 CX001246; I01 RX001774; I01 RX 001135; I01 RX 002076; I01 RX 001880; I01 RX 002172; I01 RX 002173; I01 RX 002171; I01 RX 002174; I01 RX 002170; I01 CX001820, IK6HX002608)
  • University of Utah
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002538)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, veterans, military personnel, combat exposure, long-term cognitive outcomes, cognitive domain, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Brain Concussion, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Military Personnel, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review