Can mild traumatic brain injury alter cognition chronically? A LIMBIC-CENC multicenter study.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: While outcome from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is generally favorable, concern remains over potential negative long-term effects, including impaired cognition. This study examined the link between cognitive performance and remote mTBIs within the Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (LIMBIC-CENC) multicenter, observational study of Veterans and service members (SMs) with combat exposure. METHOD: = 256) on each of the seven cognitive domains computed by averaging Z scores of prespecified component tests. Significance levels were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Neither of the mTBI positive groups differed from the mTBI negative control group on any of the cognitive domains in multivariable analyses. Findings were also consistently negative across sensitivity analyses (e.g., mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, or years since the first and last mTBI). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the average veteran or SM who experienced one or more mTBIs does not have postacute objective cognitive deficits due to mTBIs alone. A holistic health care approach including comorbidity assessment is indicated for patients reporting chronic cognitive difficulties after mTBI(s), and strategies for addressing misattribution may be beneficial. Future study is recommended with longitudinal designs to assess within-subjects decline from potential neurodegeneration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a large multicenter sample of combat-exposed Veterans and Service Members, neither 1–2 nor 3+ lifetime mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) were associated with lower objective cognitive performance compared with mTBI-negative controls. The authors conclude that the average person with remote mTBI does not show chronic cognitive deficits attributable to mTBI alone.
Key findings
- Among 1,310 participants passing performance validity tests, neither mTBI-positive group differed from mTBI-negative controls on any of seven cognitive domains in multivariable analyses after Holm adjustment (all adjusted p-values > .05).
- For 1–2 lifetime mTBIs versus no mTBI, coefficients ranged from −0.09 (Attention) to 0.05 (Verbal Fluency), with all adjusted p-values = 1 except Executive Function (p = .42); for 3+ mTBIs versus no mTBI, coefficients ranged from −0.04 (Processing Speed and Executive Function) to 0.17 (Verbal Fluency), with only Verbal Fluency adjusted p = .15.
- Sensitivity analyses using mTBI count as a continuous variable, blast-related mTBI count, and years since first/last mTBI were also consistently negative; the only raw p < .05 findings were blast-related mTBIs on Verbal Fluency (raw p = .028; adjusted p = .2) and repetitive versus non-repetitive mTBI on Verbal Fluency (raw p = .015; adjusted p = .1).
- Age and estimated pre-exposure intellectual function were consistently associated with all seven cognitive domains (all adjusted p = .01); females performed better than males on episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor/dexterity.
Methods
- Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the LIMBIC-CENC multicenter, prospective longitudinal observational study of current and former U.S. Service Members with combat exposure; 1,551 enrolled, 241 excluded for failing any of three performance validity tests, leaving n = 1,310.
- Lifetime mTBI history was classified as TBI negative controls (n = 256), 1–2 lifetime mTBIs/non-repetitive (n = 614), or 3+ lifetime mTBIs/repetitive (n = 440), using structured interview and expert consensus.
- Seven cognitive domain Z-score composites (Episodic Memory, Attention, Processing Speed, Working Memory, Executive Functioning, Verbal Fluency, Fine Motor/Dexterity) were analyzed with multivariable linear regression adjusting for demographics, estimated pre-exposure intellect, military variables, psychosocial factors, sleep, pain, and other comorbidities; Holm’s method adjusted for seven comparisons.
Limitations
- Stated: the cross-sectional design precludes understanding later cognitive changes or within-subject decline from neurodegeneration; retrospective mTBI identification is prone to recall bias; preselected domain composites may not include the most sensitive measures; many covariates increase risk of model overfitting; findings may not generalize to civilians, non-VA care populations, or women because the sample was predominantly male and military/VA-based.
- Evident from the text: the study cannot directly test whether a vulnerable subset experiences chronic objective cognitive changes, and it did not use longitudinal before-after data to assess cognitive decline over time.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
13 of 38 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationown data
If there is cumulative brain damage from repetitive, sub-concussive, low-level blast exposures, it was not apparent on the study's cognitive testing.
“If there is cumulative brain damage from repetitive, sub-concussive, low-level blast exposures as evidence from other evaluation techniques suggests (Belding et al., 2021; Goldstein et al., 2012; Stone et al., 2020; Tate et al., 2013), it was not apparent on our cognitive testing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Belding et al., 2021 source
- cites Goldstein et al., 2012 source
The Results report CTE neuropathology in veterans with blast exposure and/or concussive injury, supporting the cited point that other evaluation techniques suggest blast-related brain damage. But the veterans’ exposures included single blasts and blasts involving loss of consciousness, while the mouse model used a single blast; the paper does not establish cumulative damage from repetitive, sub-concussive, low-level blasts. The statement about 'our cognitive testing' is the citing authors’ own finding, not one attributed to Goldstein et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Stone et al., 2020 source
- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Premisecitation
Extant literature has demonstrated inconsistent findings on the enduring deleterious effects of blast-related mTBI versus blunt mTBI including on cognition.
“This is important because extant literature has demonstrated inconsistent findings on the enduring deleterious effects of blast-related mTBI versus blunt mTBI including on cognition (Belanger et al., 2009; Martindale et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Belanger et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Martindale et al., 2020 source
- Findingown data
The study found no differences in group cognitive performance for either those with non-repetitive (1-2 lifetime) or repetitive (3+ lifetime) mTBIs versus TBI negative controls.
“Using cross-sectional analyses of a large, well-characterized sample of combat-exposed Veterans and SMs and objective neuropsychological measures, we found no differences in group cognitive performance for either those with non-repetitive (1–2 lifetime) or repetitive (3+ lifetime) mTBIs versus TBI negative controls.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion: · plain
“This study found no evidence that remote mTBI(s) influence objective cognitive performance among SMs and Veterans with combat exposure history who passed performance validity measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Also stated in: § Conclusion: · plain
- Findingown data
Females performed better than males on three cognitive domains: episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor and dexterity.
“Females performed better than males on three domains: episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor and dexterity.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Additionally, females scored better than males on measures of episodic memory, processing speed, and fine motor skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
In multivariable regression analyses adjusting for covariates and multiple comparisons, neither mTBI positive group (1-2 or 3+ lifetime mTBIs) was significantly different from the mTBI negative control group on any cognitive outcome.
“Neither of the mTBI positive groups, 1–2 lifetime mTBIs (non-repetitive) or 3+ lifetime mTBIs (repetitive), were significantly different from the mTBI negative control group on any cognitive outcome after adjusting for covariates and multiple comparisons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Findingown data
In univariate regression models, neither mTBI positive group (repetitive, non-repetitive) was significantly different from the TBI negative control group for any cognitive domain Z-score after Holm correction (all adjusted p-values > 0.05).
“Neither mTBI positive group (repetitive, non-repetitive) was significantly different from the TBI negative control group for any of the respective cognitive domain Z-scores after applying the Holm’s correction for the seven comparisons (all adjusted p-values > 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Vestibular symptoms on the NSI had a significant effect on fine motor scores, with higher self-reported symptom levels associated with poorer performance.
“Vestibular symptoms on the NSI had a significant effect on fine motor scores, with higher self-reported symptom levels associated with poorer performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Findingown data
Covariates with significant findings after adjusting for multiple comparisons (adjusted p<0.05) were age, sex, race, education, estimated pre-exposure intellectual function, controlled blast, and vestibular symptoms.
“Covariates with significant findings after adjusting for multiple comparisons (adjusted p<0.05) were age, sex, race, education, estimated pre-exposure intellectual function, controlled blast, and vestibular symptoms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Findingown data
Neither the 1-2 lifetime mTBI group nor the 3+ lifetime mTBI group differed from the mTBI negative control group on any of the seven cognitive domains in multivariable analyses.
“Neither of the mTBI positive groups differed from the mTBI negative control group on any of the cognitive domains in multivariable analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Age and estimated pre-exposure intellectual function were consistently related across all seven cognitive outcomes (adjusted p=0.01).
“Age and estimated intellect were consistently related across all outcomes (adjusted p=0.01).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Of all the covariates examined in our models, only age and estimated pre-exposure intellectual function were consistently associated with statistically significant differences across all seven cognitive domains (all adjusted p=0.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Premisecitation
Beliefs, attributions and expectations may adversely impact recovery from concussion.
“As has been empirically demonstrated, beliefs, attributions and expectations may adversely impact recovery from concussion (Ozen & Fernandes, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ozen & Fernandes, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In comparison to TBI negative controls, individuals with remote mTBI history, especially those with repetitive mTBI, are well-documented to have greater self-reported cognitive difficulties.
“In comparison to TBI negative controls, individuals with remote mTBI history, especially those with repetitive mTBI, are well-documented to have greater self-reported cognitive difficulties (Walker, Hirsch, et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walker, Hirsch, et al., 2018 source
- Interpretationown data
The average Veteran or Service Member who experienced one or more mTBIs does not have post-acute objective cognitive deficits due to mTBIs alone.
“Our findings demonstrate that the average Veteran or SM who experienced one or more mTBIs does not have post-acute objective cognitive deficits due to mTBIs alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mTBI negative control group is comparable to the mTBI positive groups on all relevant characteristics except mTBI history after adjustment for covariates.
- Rests on an assumption: Cross-sectional baseline cognitive performance can be used to infer the absence of chronic post-acute cognitive deficits due to mTBI.
- Study design and conductnone given
For assuring valid performance effort, the study utilized an aggressive approach by excluding any failures of either a gold-standard stand-alone test or either of two additional well-accepted embedded measures.
“For assuring valid performance effort, we utilized an aggressive approach by excluding any failures of either a gold-standard stand-alone test or either of two additional well-accepted embedded measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.
- Interpretationcitation
Most individuals with remote mTBI(s) do not have objective cognitive deficits that might explain their self-reported cognitive difficulties.
“Our new findings add to mounting evidence that most individuals with remote mTBI(s) do not have objective cognitive deficits that might explain their self-reported cognitive difficulties (Soble et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Soble et al., 2013 source
- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Interpretationown data
The average Veteran or SM who experiences one or more mTBIs should not expect to have chronically lingering challenges with cognitive ability due to mTBI alone.
“Clinically, our findings demonstrate that the average Veteran or SM who experiences one or more mTBIs should not expect to have chronically lingering challenges with cognitive ability due to mTBI alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Interpretationown data
The negative findings for blast-related mTBI provide strong evidence against blast-related mTBI having a unique deleterious chronic effect on cognition.
“Although not part of our primary analyses, our negative findings for blast-related mTBI also provide strong evidence against blast-related mTBI having a unique deleterious chronic effect on cognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Study design and conductown data
The final analysis sample size was 1,310 after excluding 241 of 1,551 participants who failed at least one of three performance validity tests.
“The available sample included 1,551particiapants and of those, 241 failed at least one of the three PVTs and were excluded, resulting in a final analysis sample size of 1,310.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
It seems unlikely that overfitting contributed to the null findings given that there were also no significant differences in preliminary univariable analyses comparing mTBI groups on the cognitive outcomes.
“It seems unlikely that overfitting contributed to our null findings given that there were also no significant differences in preliminary univariable analyses comparing mTBI groups on the cognitive outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Study design and conductown data
The large sample size permitted analysis and statistical adjustment for many covariates that might influence the relationship between remote mTBI history and cognitive performance.
“The large sample size also permitted us to analyze and statistically adjust for the many covariates that might influence the relationship between remote mTBI history and cognitive performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because most recruitment/enrollment sites are based at VA medical facilities, these findings may not generalize to the sizeable population of former SMs who receive medical care entirely at non-VA medical centers.
“Because most of our recruitment/enrollment sites are based at VA medical facilities, these findings may not generalize to sizeable population of former SMs who receive medical care entirely at non-VA medical centers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationObjective, late cognitive deficits after mTBI have been elusive to document at the group level, with multiple meta-analytic reviews concluding insufficient evidence for deleterious effects of mTBI on objective cognitive assessment beyond the first few months post-injury.
“In general, objective, late cognitive deficits after mTBI have been elusive to document at the group level, with multiple, meta-analytic reviews concluding insufficient evidence for deleterious effects of mTBI on objective cognitive assessment beyond the first few months post-injury”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is emerging evidence that repeated mTBI may confer additional risk for both persisting symptoms and cognitive compromise.
“There is emerging evidence that repeated mTBI may confer additional risk for both persisting symptoms and cognitive compromise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe strength of correlation between the seven cognitive domains within the sample was generally moderate, with values ranging from r=0.19 to r=0.49.
“The strength of correlation between the seven cognitive domains within our sample was generally in the ‘moderate’ range (Cohen, 1988), with values ranging from r=0.19 to r=0.49 (full results are available online in Supplemental Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, 1988 source
The Results section discusses correlations in an analysis of religion and abortion responses, but it gives no rule classifying correlations as ‘moderate.’ Searches for moderate-correlation thresholds and for the seven cognitive domains found no relevant passage in this paper. The cited paper’s References section lists a separate 1988 Cohen book, but the paper itself does not state the classification attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite the common occurrence of chronic cognitive subjective symptomology after mTBI, extant research shows a lack of a consistent relationship with cognitive performance on formal neuropsychological examination, including in military samples.
“Despite the common occurrence of chronic cognitive subjective symptomology after mTBI, extant research shows a lack of a consistent relationship with cognitive performance on formal neuropsychological examination, including samples of military personnel”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mac Donald et al., 2017 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese findings align with prior studies and provide some of the strongest evidence to date that in unselected mTBI cases, lower cognitive performance does not chronically persist relative to controls.
“These findings align with prior studies and provide some of the strongest evidence to date that in unselected mTBI cases, lower cognitive performance does not chronically persist relative to controls (Belanger et al., 2005; Binder et al., 1997; Frencham et al., 2005; Karr et al., 2014; Rohling et al., 2011; Schretlen & Shapiro, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Belanger et al., 2005 source
The supplied copy contains an abstract stating that unselected or prospective samples showed no residual neuropsychological impairment by three months, but no corresponding passage from the paper’s body was available. Searches for unselected samples and persistent deficits returned only the abstract and references; under the specified evidence rule, the abstract cannot establish the verdict. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Binder et al., 1997 source
- cites Frencham et al., 2005 source
- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPPCS are especially common among U.S. Veterans and Service Members who sustained mTBI in the post-9/11 wars, including Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn.
“PPCS are especially common among U.S. Veterans and SMs who sustained mTBI in the post-911 wars, including Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Cifu et al., 2013 source
- cites Hendricks et al., 2013 source
- cites Taylor et al., 2012 source
The Introduction discusses how often mild TBI occurred among Afghanistan and Iraq veterans, while the Results and Conclusions report psychiatric diagnoses and pain among VA users diagnosed with TBI. Neither establishes how common persistent postconcussive symptoms (PPCS) are after mTBI. A PPCS study appears in the Reference List, but this paper does not report its PPCS finding; the passages also do not address Operation New Dawn. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlast-related mTBI may have more enduring long-term effects on cognition compared to blunt mTBI, but the evidence is mixed.
“Another factor specific to military populations with mixed research evidence is the concern that blast-related mTBI has more enduring long-term effects on cognition compared to blunt mTBI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Belanger et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Martindale et al., 2020 source
The Discussion (page not available in our copy) says findings on blast-related versus non-blast mTBI are mixed: some studies find no cognitive difference, while others find subtle differences associated with blast exposure. The paper also raises the possibility of persisting cognitive difficulties, but it does not establish that effects of blast-related mTBI last longer than those of blunt mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe use of measures recommended as NIH NINDS TBI common data elements allows other studies to compare their results to ours.
“Finally, the use of measures recommended as NIH NINDS TBI common data elements allows other studies to compare their results to ours (Hicks et al., 2013; Report Viewer | NINDS Common Data Elements, n.d.)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Hicks et al., 2013 source
- cites Report Viewer | NINDS Common Data Elements, n.d.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe physical and mental health symptom measure covariates showed less significance in the models than anticipated, but results were consistent with smaller studies that also measured performance validity.
“The physical and mental health symptom measure covariates showed less significance in the models than anticipated, but results were consistent with smaller studies that also measured performance validity (Wisdom et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wisdom et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing the original one-item measure, the only significant reduction was for verbal fluency in those with a medium level (10-89) of controlled blast exposures compared to none, but it was not significant for the high level (90+) group.
“Using our original one-item measure, the only significant reduction was for verbal fluency in those with a medium level (10–89) of controlled blast exposures compared to none, but it was not significant for the high level (90+) group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the comparison of 1-2 mTBIs to no TBIs in multivariable models, coefficients ranged from −0.09 (Attention) to 0.05 (Verbal Fluency) and all adjusted p-values were 1 except for Executive Function (p=0.42).
“Coefficients for the comparison of 1–2 mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.09 (Attention) to 0.05 (Verbal Fluency) and all adjusted p-values were 1 except for Executive Function (p=0.42).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe repetitive mTBI group was receiving more medication classes that might compromise cognition than TBI negative controls (p=0.003), but the mean difference (0.2) and effect size (Cohen's d=0.18) were very small.
“The repetitive mTBI group was receiving more medication classes that might compromise cognition (p=0.003), but the mean difference (0.2) and effect size (Cohen’s d=0.18) versus the TBI negative controls were very small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn sensitivity analyses replacing the three mTBI groups with number of mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, and time since first and last mTBI, none showed significant relationships of mTBIs with any of the seven cognitive domain outcomes after adjustment for multiple comparisons, except total number of blast-related mTBIs on Verbal Fluency (raw p=0.028; adjusted p=0.2) и
“Similar to the primary analysis, none of these sensitivity analyses showed significant relationships of mTBIs with any of the seven cognitive domain outcomes after adjustment for multiple comparisons, with all of the adjusted p-value for mTBIs above 0.05 even before adjustment except for total number of blast-related mTBIs on Verbal Fluency (raw p=0.028; adjusted p=0.2) and repetitive versus non”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Additional sensitivity analyses also showed non-significance for all other TBI explanators examined, namely number of mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, and years since first and last mTBI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sample's mean age at enrollment was 39.7 years and mean time since index event was 9.7 years.
“Overall, the sample’s mean age at enrollment was 39.7 years and their mean time since index event was 9.7 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no differences across TBI groups for being on an antidepressant (p=0.24) or a cognitive-enhancing medication (p=0.28).
“Regarding medications, there were no differences across TBI groups for being on an antidepressant (p=0.24) or a cognitive-enhancing medication (p=0.28).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor repetitive mTBI (3+ mTBIs) versus controls in univariate models, coefficients ranged from −0.17 (Fine Motor and Dexterity) to 0.18 (Verbal Fluency), and adjusted p-values ranged from p=0.06 (Verbal Fluency) to 1 (three domains).
“Coefficients for the comparison of 3+ mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.17 (Fine Motor and Dexterity) to 0.18 (Verbal Fluency).”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive performance across mTBI groups and their unadjusted comparisons · plain
“For repetitive mTBI (3+ mTBIs) versus controls, p-values ranged from p=0.06 (Verbal Fluency) to 1 (three domains).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Cognitive performance across mTBI groups and their unadjusted comparisons · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigher estimated pre-exposure intellectual function (NIHTB-CB Picture Vocabulary test) was related to higher scores on other cognitive measures, and education level had a significant effect on four domains.
“As also expected, higher estimated pre-exposure intellectual function (NIHTB-CB Picture Vocabulary test) was related to higher scores on other cognitive measures, and education level had a significant effect on four domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the comparison of 3+ mTBIs to no TBIs in multivariable models, coefficients ranged from −0.04 (Processing Speed and Executive Function) to 0.17 (Verbal Fluency) and the only adjusted p-value under 1 was Verbal Fluency (adjusted p=0.15).
“Coefficients for the comparison of 3+ mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.04 (Processing Speed and Executive Function) to 0.17 (Verbal Fluency) and the only adjusted p-value under 1 was Verbal Fluency (adjusted p=0.15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFindings were consistently negative across sensitivity analyses, including when mTBIs were modeled as a continuous variable, when blast-related mTBIs were analyzed, and when years since first and last mTBI were considered.
“Findings were also consistently negative across sensitivity analyses (e.g., mTBIs as a continuous variable, number of blast-related mTBIs, or years since first and last mTBI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sample was predominantly male (87%), educated with at least some college or technical school (86%), had an enlisted rank (84%), and served in the Army (65%).
“Overall, the sample was diverse racially (27% non-White) and ethnically (17% Hispanic), was predominantly male (87%), educated with at least some college or technical school (86%), had an enlisted rank (84%), and served in the Army (65%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor the non-repetitive TBI group (1-2 mTBIs) versus controls in univariate models, coefficients ranged from −0.09 (Episodic Memory and Processing Speed) to 0.02 (Verbal Fluency), and adjusted p-values ranged from p=0.09 (Executive Function) to 1 (two domains).
“Coefficients for the comparison of 1–2 mTBIs to no TBIs ranged from −0.09 (Episodic Memory and Processing Speed) to 0.02 (Verbal Fluency).”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive performance across mTBI groups and their unadjusted comparisons · plain
“For the non-repetitive TBI group (1–2 mTBIs) versus controls, adjusted p-values ranged from p=0.09 (Executive Function) to 1 (two domains).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Cognitive performance across mTBI groups and their unadjusted comparisons · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe relationships between the seven domains in the sample showed moderate correlations, suggesting that further collapsing of domains may be possible.
“The relationships between the seven domains in our sample showed ‘moderate’ correlations, suggesting that further collapsing of domains may be possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFor the current analyses, only baseline data were used, and participants who failed any of the three performance validity tests were excluded.
“For the current analyses, only data collected at baseline assessment were utilized, and participants who failed any of the three tests of performance validity described further below were excluded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor all additional sensitivity models, all GVIF values were below 2.4, indicating no evidence of multicollinearity.
“For all of these additional models, all GVIF values were below 2.4, indicating no evidence of multicollinearity (Table S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe literature remains inconclusive on whether repeated mTBI affects objective cognitive performance, as many studies have failed to demonstrate an effect.
“However, the literature remains inconclusive, as many other studies have failed to demonstrate an effect of repeated mTBI on objective cognitive performance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Belanger et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Cooper et al., 2018 source
- cites Macciocchi et al., 2001
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe study has the largest sample size to date with comprehensive neurocognitive testing in Veterans and SMs with blast-related mTBI.
“Our study has the largest sample size to date with comprehensive neurocognitive testing in Veterans and SMs with blast-related mTBI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe strong association with lower scores as age increased was expected given the use of raw scores rather than population-normed scores to calculate sample-based Z-scores.
“The strong association with lower scores as age increased was expected given our use of raw scores rather than population-normed scores to calculate the sample-based Z-scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation20% or more of patients with mTBI experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS).
“Nevertheless, 20% or more of patients with mTBI experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lagacé-Legendre et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningKey strengths of the study include the very large and ethnically and racially diverse sample, the inclusion of mTBI-negative but deployed controls, and the exclusion of cases with profiles of invalid testing.
“Key strengths of this study include the very large and ethnically and racially diverse sample, the inclusion of mTBI-negative but deployed controls, and the exclusion of cases with profiles of invalid testing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe mTBI negative controls were recruited through the same processes as the mTBI positive participants, providing a relevant control group with similar background characteristics and experiences.
“Notably, our mTBI negative controls were recruited through the same processes as the mTBI positive participants which provided a relevant control group with similar background characteristics and experiences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThere is inconclusive research regarding the risk of chronic neurocognitive decrements after a single mTBI or even repeated mTBIs.
“Taken together, there is inconclusive research regarding the risk of chronic, neurocognitive decrements after a single mTBI or even repeated mTBIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe negative findings do not rule out the potential for a vulnerable subset of individuals who do experience chronic objective cognitive changes after mTBI.
“While providing an encouraging message to Veterans, SMs, and providers, these negative findings do not rule out the potential for a vulnerable subset of individuals who do experience chronic objective cognitive changes after mTBI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe parent study, including the database registry and all secondary analyses, was approved by the local Institutional Review Boards at each PLS enrollment site, and all participants provided written consent prior to any study procedures.
“The parent study, including the database registry and all secondary analyses, was approved by the local Institutional Review Boards at each of the PLS enrollment sites. All participants provide written consent prior to any study procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPPCS typically include cognitive symptoms such as decreased concentration, memory, and processing speed, in addition to somatic and emotional symptoms.
“PPCS typically include cognitive symptoms, such as decreased concentration, memory, and processing speed, in addition to somatic and emotional symptoms, such as headache, dizziness, disordered sleep, fatigue, irritability, increased arousal, and sensitivity to light and sound”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPeople associate concussion with negative outcomes and therefore experience a type of 'diagnosis threat'.
“This is thought to occur because people associate concussion with negative outcomes and therefore experience a type of “diagnosis threat” (Suhr & Gunstad, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suhr & Gunstad, 2002 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAnother strength was the a-priori designation of seven cognitive domain composite scores for the dependent variable and appropriately adjusting for Type 1 error.
“Another strength was the a-priori designation of seven cognitive domain composite scores for the dependent variable and appropriately adjusting for Type 1 error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe sex-related findings are consistent with the literature in the general population, especially for episodic memory and processing speed.
“These sex-related findings are consistent with the literature in the general population, especially for episodic memory (Asperholm et al., 2019) and processing speed (Camarata & Woodcock, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAttributional styles are mutable and can be successfully addressed.
“From a clinical perspective, it is important to note that attributional styles are mutable and can be successfully addressed (Peters et al., 2011) .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al., 2011 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThere was no presence of multicollinearity in any multivariable model (all GVIF < 2.4).
“There was no presence of multicollinearity in any model (all GVIF < 2.4, full results available on-line in supplementary Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe study sample consists entirely of current and former military SMs who often sustained mTBI during combat deployment and/or blast-related mTBI, so the findings may not generalize well to civilians.
“Given the LIMBIC-CENC research mission, our study sample consists entirely of current and former military SMs who often sustained mTBI during combat deployment and/or blast-related mTBI, so the findings may not generalize well to civilians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSelf-reported concerns about cognitive difficulties in persons in the chronic phase following mTBI are likely best treated with a holistic approach that considers common comorbid conditions and situational factors.
“This suggests that self-reported concerns about cognitive difficulties in persons in the chronic phase following mTBI are likely best treated with a holistic approach that considers common comorbid conditions and situational factors that could be associated with longstanding cognitive complaints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe study sample was predominantly male, so the findings may not generalize well to women.
“Our study sample, which mirrored the broader U.S. military population in gender make up, was predominantly male, so our findings may also not generalize well to women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe retrospective identification of historical mTBI is prone to recall bias.
“Additionally, although we used a validated structured interview method with layers of quality assurance, the retrospective identification of historical mTBI is prone to recall bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of difference in cognitive performance may be, in part, related to benefit gained from treatment since participants had access to specialized brain injury rehabilitation services.
“The lack of difference in cognitive performance may be, in part, related to benefit gained from treatment since our participants had access to specialized brain injury rehabilitation services in the Military and/or Veterans healthcare system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenStrategies for addressing misattribution may also be beneficial.
“Strategies for addressing misattribution may also be beneficial and further research on behavioral interventions for patients with tightly held negative beliefs on the impact of their remote concussions is also recommended.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe cross-sectional design precludes understanding of later cognitive changes which may be due to TBI or other comorbidities as well as subtle changes that may be related to other aspects of deployment.
“Foremost is the cross-sectional design, which precludes understanding of later cognitive changes which may be due to TBI or other comorbidities as well as subtle changes that may be related to other aspects of deployment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRegression models are increasingly prone to overfitting as the number of covariates increases.
“While our consideration of multiple potential confounders is a strength, regression models are increasingly prone to overfitting as the number of covariates increases (Babyak, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babyak, 2004 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIt is possible the study may not have selected the most sensitive measures to capture cognitive effects.
“Although our use of pre-selected cognitive domain composite scores sharpened our scientific rigor, it is possible we may have not selected the most sensitive measures to capture cognitive effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The mTBI negative control group is comparable to the mTBI positive groups on all relevant characteristics except mTBI history after adjustment for covariates.
“Using multivariable regression models that adjusted for covariates, including age and estimated pre-exposure intellectual function, positive mTBI history groups, 1–2 lifetime mTBIs (non-repetitive, n=614) and 3+ lifetime mTBIs (repetitive; n=440) were compared to TBI negative controls (n=256) on each of seven cognitive domains”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cross-sectional baseline cognitive performance can be used to infer the absence of chronic post-acute cognitive deficits due to mTBI.
“This cross-sectional study analyzed data collected at the enrollment visit for the ongoing LIMBIC-CENC multicenter PLS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.
“The use of dissimilar controls and/or inclusion of cases with diminished or feigned effort are both important sources of potential bias toward positive associations between mTBI and cognitive decline.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The set of covariates included in the multivariable models adequately controls for confounding of the relationship between mTBI history and cognitive performance.
“Multivariable linear regression was the primary approach for examining the conditional relationship between mTBI groups and each of the seven neurocognitive domain outcomes separately while adjusting for the covariates.”
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · Cited by 35,234 · see citing works
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526 · see citing works
Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22059 · Cited by 5,233 · see citing works
Babyak, M. A. (2004) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9 · Cited by 2,061 · see citing works
Set correlation and contingency tables
Cohen, J. (1988) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168801200410 · Cited by 1,825 · see citing works
Guskiewicz, K. M., McCrea, M., Marshall, S. W., Cantu, R. C., Randolph, C., Barr, W., Onate, J. A., & Kelly, J. P. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2549 · Cited by 1,712 · see citing works
Chung, F., Abdullah, H. R., & Liao, P. (2016) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.15-0903 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Bauer, P. J., Carlozzi, N. E., Slotkin, J., Blitz, D., Wallner-Allen, K., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872ded · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Vision assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Varma, R., McKean‐Cowdin, R., Vitale, S., Slotkin, J., & Hays, R. D. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182876e0a · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
Goldstein, L. E., Fisher, A. M., Tagge, C. A., Zhang, X.-L., Velisek, L., Sullivan, J. A., Upreti, C., Kracht, J. M., Ericsson, M., Wojnarowicz, M. W., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003716 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test
Yudko, E., Lozhkina, O., & Fouts, A. (2007) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.08.002 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Initial Reliability and Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method
Corrigan, J. D., & Bogner, J. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000300227.67748.77 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Insomnia and daytime cognitive performance: A meta-analysis
Fortier-Brochu, É., Beaulieu‐Bonneau, S., Ivers, H., & Morin, C. M. (2011) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2011.03.008 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D. J., Groninger, L. D., Dobraski, M., & Shpritz, B. (1996) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.2.145 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
BELANGER, H. G., CURTISS, G., DEMERY, J. A., LEBOWITZ, B. K., & VANDERPLOEG, R. D. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050277 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of potential long-term effects of sport-related concussion.
Manley, G., Gardner, A. J., Schneider, K. J., Guskiewicz, K. M., Bailes, J., Cantu, R. C., Castellani, R. J., Turner, M., Jordan, B. D., Randolph, C., et al. (2017) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097791 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning
Schretlen, D. J., & Shapiro, A. M. (2003) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260310001606728 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury
Wilson, L., Stewart, W., Dams-O'Connor, K., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Horton, L., Menon, D. K., & Polinder, S. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30279-x · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Reliability and validity of the delis-kaplan executive function system: An update.
DELIS, D. C., KRAMER, J. H., KAPLAN, E., & HOLDNACK, J. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704102191 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
The Trail Making Test, Part B: Cognitive Flexibility or Ability to Maintain Set?
Kortte, K. B., Horner, M. D., & Windham, W. K. (2002) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15324826an0902_5 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
A review of mild head trauma. Part I: Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies.
Binder, L. M., Rohling, M. L., & Larrabee, G. J. (1997) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639708403870 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Participants, C. (2021) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
DIKMEN, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Temkin, N. R. (1999) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617799544056 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Cognitive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury
DIKMEN, S. S., Corrigan, J. D., Levin, H. S., Machamer, J., Stiers, W. M., & Weisskopf, M. G. (2009) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e3181c133e9 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Wilde, E. A., Whiteneck, G. G., Bogner, J., Bushnik, T., Cifu, D. X., Dikmen, S., French, L., Giacino, J. T., Hart, T., Malec, J. F., et al. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Self-citationVA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
(2009) · PubMed · Cited by 420 · see citing works
WOODS, S., DELIS, D., SCOTT, J., KRAMER, J., & HOLDNACK, J. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.002 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Karr, J. E., Areshenkoff, C. N., & García-Barrera, M. A. (2013) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000037 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Exploring the convergence of posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury
Stein, M. B., & McAllister, T. W. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101604 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Ponsford, J. L., Draper, K., & Schönberger, M. (2008) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617708080272 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Frencham, K. A. R., Fox, A. M., & Maybery, M. T. (2005) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390490520328 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Taylor, B. C., Hagel, E. M., Carlson, K. F., Cifu, D. X., Cutting, A., Bidelspach, D. E., & Sayer, N. A. (2012) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318245a558 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Self-citationNIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults
Zelazo, P. D., Anderson, J. E., Richler, J., Wallner-Allen, K., Beaumont, J. L., Conway, K. P., Gershon, R., & Weintraub, S. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000472 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Schroeder, R. W., Twumasi‐Ankrah, P., Baade, L. E., & Marshall, P. (2011) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191111428764 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Vogt, D. S., Smith, B. N., King, L. A., King, D. W., Knight, J., & Vasterling, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.21868 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Rohling, M. L., Binder, L. M., Demakis, G. J., Larrabee, G. J., Ploetz, D. M., & Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, J. (2011) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2011.565076 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
A Meta-Analytic Review of Verbal Fluency Performance in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2004) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.4.621 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Cognitive sequelae of blast-related versus other mechanisms of brain trauma
Belanger, H. G., Kretzmer, T. S., Yoash-Gantz, R. E., Pickett, T. C., & Tupler, L. A. (2009) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617708090036 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Self-citationBelanger, H. G., Spiegel, E. P., & Vanderploeg, R. D. (2009) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617709991287 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationMisdiagnosis of the persistent postconcussion syndrome in patients with depression
Iverson, G. L. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.12.008 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
A selective and critical review of neuropsychological deficits and the frontal lobes
Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. E. (1994) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01874891 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“Diagnosis Threat”: The Effect of Negative Expectations on Cognitive Performance in Head Injury
Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2002) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/jcen.24.4.448.1039 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, and pain diagnoses in OIF/OEF/OND veterans
Cifu, D. X., Taylor, B. C., Carne, W. F., Bidelspach, D., Sayer, N. A., Scholten, J., & Campbell, E. H. (2013) · Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2013.01.0006 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationA Narrative Review of Dexterity Assessments
Yancosek, K. E., & Howell, D. (2009) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.004 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Brenner, L. A., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Terrio, H. (2009) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016908 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB): List Sorting Test to Measure Working Memory
Tulsky, D. S., Carlozzi, N., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Beaumont, J. L., Kisala, P. A., Mungas, D., Conway, K., & Gershon, R. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561771400040x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females
Camarata, S., & Woodcock, R. (2006) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.12.001 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Ruttan, L., Martin, K., Liu, A. M. M., Colella, B., & Green, R. (2008) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.007 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Language Measures of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery
Gershon, R. C., Cook, K. F., Mungas, D., Manly, J. J., Slotkin, J., Beaumont, J. L., & Weintraub, S. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000411 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Hicks, R., Giacino, J., Harrison-Felix, C., Manley, G., Valadka, A., & Wilde, E. A. (2013) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2938 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory.
Asperholm, M., Högman, N., Rafi, J., & Herlitz, A. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000197 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Tate, C. M., Wang, K., Eonta, S. E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2683 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Lippa, S. M. (2017) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Psychometric Assessment of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory-22
Meterko, M. M., Baker, E. H., Stolzmann, K. L., Hendricks, A., Cicerone, K. D., & Lew, H. L. (2011) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e318230fb17 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Measuring Episodic Memory Across the Lifespan: NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test
DIKMEN, S. S., Bauer, P. J., Weıntraub, S., Mungas, D., Slotkin, J., Beaumont, J. L., Gershon, R. C., Temkin, N. R., & Heaton, R. K. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000460 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Early clinical predictors of 5-year outcome after concussive blast traumatic brain injury
Mac Donald, C. L., Barber, J., Jordan, M., Johnson, A. M., Dikmen, S., Fann, J. R., & Temkin, N. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0143 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of the VA Traumatic Brain Injury Screening Tool
Donnelly, K. T., Donnelly, J. P., Dunnam, M., Warner, G. C., Kittleson, C. J., Constance, J. E., Bradshaw, C. B., & Alt, M. (2011) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e3182005de3 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Cooper, D. B., Bunner, A. E., Kennedy, J. E., Balldin, V. H., Tate, D. F., Eapen, B. C., & Jaramillo, C. A. (2015) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9440-2 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationGreen, P., Montijo, J. A., & Brockhaus, R. (2011) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09084282.2010.523389 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Schreiber, S., Barkai, G., Gur-Hartman, T., Peles, E., Tov, N., Dolberg, O. T., & Pick, C. G. (2007) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2007.04.014 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
(2001) · PubMed Central · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Network Analysis and Precision Rehabilitation for the Post-concussion Syndrome
Iverson, G. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00489 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Cnossen, M. C., Winkler, E. A., Yue, J. K., Okonkwo, D. O., Valadka, A. B., Steyerberg, E. W., Lingsma, H. F., Manley, G. T., & the TRACK-TBI Investigators (2017) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4819 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB): The NIHTB Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test
Carlozzi, N. E., Tulsky, D. S., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Beaumont, J. L., Weintraub, S., Conway, K., & Gershon, R. C. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000319 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Matarazzo, J. D., Wiens, A. N., Matarazzo, R. G., & Goldstein, S. G. (1974) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-197401000-00006 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Walker, W. C., Carne, W. F., Franke, L. M., Nolen, T. L., Dikmen, S. D., Cifu, D. X., Wilson, K. E., Belanger, H. G., & Williams, R. L. (2016) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2016.1219061 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationWalker, W. C., Cifu, D. X., Hudak, A. M., Goldberg, G., Kunz, R. D., & Sima, A. P. (2015) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3433 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationKenney, K., Qu, B.-X., Lai, C., Devoto, C., Motamedi, V., Walker, W. C., Levin, H. S., Nolen, T., Wilde, E. A., Diaz-Arrastia, R., et al. (2018) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1483530 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationBarker-Collo, S. L., Jones, K., Theadom, A., Starkey, N. J., Dowell, A. C., McPherson, K. M., Ameratunga, S. N., Dudley, M., Ao, B. T., Feigin, V. L., et al. (2015) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1075143 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Changes in Sleep Patterns Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Ponsford, J. L., Parcell, D. L., Sinclair, K. L., Roper, M., & Rajaratnam, S. M. W. (2013) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968313481283 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Cooper, D. B., Bowles, A. O., Kennedy, J. E., Curtiss, G., French, L. M., Tate, D. F., & Vanderploeg, R. D. (2016) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000254 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationVincent, A. S., Roebuck‐Spencer, T., & Cernich, A. N. (2014) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.006 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Effects of “Diagnosis Threat” on Cognitive and Affective Functioning Long After Mild Head Injury
Ozen, L., & Fernandes, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561771000144x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Effects of visual acuity and visual motor speed and dexterity on cognitive test performance
Schear, J. M., & Sato, S. D. (1989) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/0887-6177(89)90004-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Stone, J. R., Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Wassermann, E. M., Gill, J., Polejaeva, E., Dell, K. C., Carr, W., Yarnell, A. M., LoPresti, M. L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7141 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
O'Neil, M. E., Carlson, K. F., Storzbach, D. M., Brenner, L. A., Freeman, M., Quiñones, A. R., Motu’apuaka, M. L., & Kansagara, D. L. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561771300146x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationOtis, J. D., McGlinchey, R. E., Vasterling, J. J., & Kerns, R. D. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9239-2 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Porter, K. E., Stein, M. B., Martis, B., et al. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.03.004 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Short-Term Retest Reliability of the Halstead-Reitan Battery in a Normal Sample
Bornstein, R. A., BAKER, G. B., & Douglass, A. B. (1987) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198704000-00007 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Storzbach, D. M., O'Neil, M. E., Roost, S.-M., Kowalski, H. M., Iverson, G. L., Binder, L. M., Fann, J. R., & Huckans, M. S. (2015) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617715000326 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental modification of attribution processes.
Peters, K. D., Constans, J. I., & Mathews, A. (2011) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021899 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Ahmed, O. H., & Hall, E. E. (2016) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.07.003 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Hendricks, A. M., Amara, J., Baker, E., Charns, M. P., Gardner, J. A., Iverson, K. M., Kimerling, R., Krengel, M., Meterko, M., Pogoda, T. K., et al. (2013) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.729284 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroanatomy and Neuropsychology of Pain
Khalid, S., & Tubbs, R. S. (2017) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.1754 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
STRENGE, H., Niederberger, U., & Seelhorst, U. (2002) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.507 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Clark, A. L., Amick, M. M., Fortier, C. B., Milberg, W., & McGlinchey, R. E. (2014) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2014.904928 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
PTSD and Cognitive Functioning: Importance of Including Performance Validity Testing
Wisdom, N. M., Pastorek, N. J., Miller, B., Booth, J. E., Romesser, J. M., Linck, J. F., & Sim, A. H. (2013) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.863977 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms: An Expert Consensus-Based Definition Using the Delphi Method
Lagacé-Legendre, C., Boucher, V., Robert, S., Tardif, P., Ouellet, M., de Guise, É., Boulard, G., Frémont, P., Émond, M., Moore, L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000613 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Belding, J. N., Englert, R. M., Fitzmaurice, S., Jackson, J. R., Koenig, H. G., Hunter, M. A., Thomsen, C. J., & da Silva, U. O. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.628782 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Verbal fluency in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.
Raskin, S. A., & Rearick, E. (1996) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.10.3.416 · Cited by 52
Kuitunen‐Paul, S., & Roerecke, M. (2018) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2017-210078 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Walker, W. C., Hirsch, S., Carne, W., Nolen, T., Cifu, D. X., Wilde, E. A., Levin, H. S., Brearly, T. W., Eapen, B. C., & Williams, R. (2018) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1479041 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Reported Mild TBI and Postconcussive Symptoms in a Peacetime Active Duty Military Population
Miller, K. J., Ivins, B. J., & Schwab, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0b013e318255ceae · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Football Players' Perceptions of Future Risk of Concussion and Concussion-Related Health Outcomes
Baugh, C. M., Kroshus, E., Kiernan, P. T., Mendel, D. L., & Meehan, W. P., III (2016) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4585 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Farmer, J. E., & Eakman, A. M. (1995) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09084282.1995.9645347 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Influence of blast exposure on cognitive functioning in combat veterans.
Martindale, S. L., Ord, A. S., & Rowland, J. A. (2020) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000672 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bachstetter, A. D., Morganti, J. M., Bodnar, C. N., Webster, S. J., Higgins, E. K., Roberts, K. N., Snider, H., Meier, S. E., Nation, G. K., Goulding, D. S., et al. (2020) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113180 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Athletes Involved with High-impact Sports.
Safinia, C., Bershad, E. M., Clark, H. B., SantaCruz, K. S., Alakbarova, N., Suárez, J. I., & Divani, A. A. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Armistead‐Jehle, P., Cooper, D. B., & Vanderploeg, R. D. (2015) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2015.1055564 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lange, R. T., Brickell, T. A., Bailie, J. M., Tulsky, D. S., & French, L. M. (2015) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000149 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Soble, J. R., Spanierman, L. B., & Fitzgerald Smith, J. (2013) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2013.798398 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cooper, D. B., Curtiss, G., Armistead-Jehle, P., Belanger, H. G., Tate, D. F., Reid, M., Bowles, A. O., Velez, C. S., Kennedy, J. E., & Vanderploeg, R. D. (2018) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000375 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationWalker, W. C., Nowak, K. J., Kenney, K., Franke, L. M., Eapen, B. C., Skop, K. M., Levin, H. S., Agyemang, A. A., Tate, D. F., Wilde, E. A., et al. (2018) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1483529 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationBelanger, H. G., Wortzel, H. S., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Cooper, D. B. (2019) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2019.1699166 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationINS volume 20 issue 3 Cover and Front matter
(2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000204 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Anderson, J. F. I., & Jordan, A. S. (2020) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2020.1781665 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Recruiting for a multicentre DoD and VA longitudinal study: lessons learned
Sickinger, K., Walker, W. C., Agyemang, A. A., Cifu, D. X., Lewis, T. L., & Carne, W. F. (2018) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1492740 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationFactors Influencing College Football Players’ Beliefs About Incurring Football-Related Dementia
Baugh, C. M., Gedlaman, M. A., Daneshvar, D. H., et al. (2021) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/23259671211001129 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Benedict R (1997). Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. In Psychological Assessment Resources 10.1037/1040-3590.8.2.145 · DOI
- Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, & Ober BA (2000). California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.). Psychological Corporation.
- DesRosiers G, & Kavanagh D (1987). Cognitive assessment in closed head injury: Stability, validity and parallel forms for two neuropsychological measures of recovery. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9(4), 162– 173.
- James Gareth, Witten Daniela, Hastie Trevor, and Tibshirani Robert. (2014). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
- Lamberty GJ, Putnam SH, Chatel DM, Bieliauskas LA, & (1994). Derived Trail Making Test indices: A preliminary report. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 7(3), 230– 234.
- Rolle-Lake L, & Robbins E (2020). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. In StatPearls StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553031/ 31971707
- Wechsler D, Coalson DL, & Raiford SE (2008). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual Pearson.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corrigan, J. D., Alosco, M. L., van der Naalt, J., Adams, R. S., Asken, B. M., Hinds, S., Lequerica, A. H., Newcombe, V., Tenovuo, O., Valera, E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2024.0590 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Walker, W. C., O'Neil, M. E., Ou, Z., Pogoda, T. K., Belanger, H. G., Scheibel, R. S., Presson, A. P., Miles, S. R., Wilde, E. A., Tate, D. F., Troyanskaya, M., Pugh, M. J., Jak, A., & Cifu, D. X.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- VA Portland Health Care System (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System (US)
- VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- PMC
- PMC10117581
- OpenAlex
- W4297998788
- Semantic Scholar
- 046e27c56a4276e638aaa5961a6ed370409dcc03
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neuropsychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- US Department of Defense (W81XWH-18-PH/TBIRP-LIMBIC; W81XWH1920067; W81XWH-13-2-0095)
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX002097; I01 CX002096; I01 HX003155; I01 RX003444; I01 RX003443; I01 RX003442; I01 CX001135; I01 CX001246; I01 RX001774; I01 RX 001135; I01 RX 002076; I01 RX 001880; I01 RX 002172; I01 RX 002173; I01 RX 002171; I01 RX 002174; I01 RX 002170; I01 CX001820, IK6HX002608)
- University of Utah
- National Center for Research Resources
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002538)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, veterans, military personnel, combat exposure, long-term cognitive outcomes, cognitive domain, neurodegeneration
- MeSH terms
- Brain Concussion, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Military Personnel, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review