Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSleep and related disordersTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep outcomes in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and contributing factors

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the prevalence of disturbed sleep in children who sustained mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: We conducted electronic searches of three databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO and EMBASE against pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: Forty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was mainly rated as moderate to high. Meta-analysis revealed that prevalence of sleep disturbances decreased as the time since injury increased: 51%, 40% and 9% within 1 week, between 1 week and 1 month, and between 1 and 3 months, respectively, but increased to 21% after 3 months. The sleep symptom drowsiness followed a similar temporal pattern. Other sleep symptoms of hypersomnia (sleeping more than usual) and insomnia (trouble falling asleep and sleeping less than usual) remained stable over time. The prevalence of sleep disturbances in children with mTBI was higher than in the general population. Pre-injury sleep and older age at injury were related to worse sleep outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent in the acute phase post-mTBI. Given that disturbed sleep can impact daily functioning and recovery, routine screening and management of sleep disturbances in children who sustain mTBI is important.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699052.2022.2140198

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Higgins JPT, 2021, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021)
  2. Necajauskaite O, 2005, Medicina, 41, 457

Cited by

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Djukic, S., Phillips, N. L., & Lah, S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Lah, Suncica
Venue
Brain Injury
Published
2022-11-22
Volume
36
Issue
12-14
Pages
1289-1322
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
OpenAlex
W4309665111
Cited by
26
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, pediatric brain injury, sleep disorders, sleepiness, hypersomnia, insomnia, prevalence, time since injury, age at injury, sleep screening
MeSH terms
Brain Concussion, Child, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.