The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Caregiver burden at 1 year following severe traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Sixty-nine primary caregivers of adults with a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) were assessed at 1-year post-injury. Caregivers completed questionnaires on the physical, cognitive, emotional, behavioural, and social functioning of the person with TBI. Caregiver objective burden, psychosocial functioning, and subjective burden were also assessed. Clinically significant levels of anxiety and depression were evident in over a third of the caregivers. Similarly, a quarter of the caregivers reported poor social adjustment. There was no consistent relationship between the prevalence of various types of objective burden and the level of subjective distress that resulted from these changes. The person with TBI's emotional difficulties, in particular their anger, apathy, and dependency, caused the greatest distress for caregivers. With regard to the impact that caregiving had on their own lives, caregivers were most distressed by the loss of personal free time. Results from a regression analysis indicated that the person with TBI's physical impairment, number of behavioural problems, and social isolation were the strongest predictors of caregiver burden. The impact that caring for a person with severe TBI can have on the extended family unit is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report.
Weissman, M. M. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010 · Cited by 1,782
Social adjustment by self-report in a community sample and in psychiatric outpatients
WEISSMAN, M. M., PRUSOFF, B. A., THOMPSON, W. D., HARDING, P. S., & MYERS, J. K. (1978) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-197805000-00002 · Cited by 537
Cited by
Apathy in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
den Brok, M. G. H. E., van Dalen, J. W., van Gool, W. A., Moll van Charante, E. P., de Bie, R. M. A., & Richard, E. (2015) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.26208 · Cited by 376
van Reekum, R., Stuss, D. T., & Ostrander, L. (2005) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.17.1.7 · Cited by 360
Disorders of diminished motivation
Marin, R. S., & Wilkosz, P. A. (2005) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-200507000-00009 · Cited by 241
Damianakis, T., Tough, A., Marziali, E., & Dawson, D. R. (2016) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000178 · Cited by 43
The psychosocial impact of neurobehavioral disability
Williams, C., Wood, R. L., Alderman, N., & Worthington, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00119 · Cited by 28
Emotion, Wellbeing and the Neurological Disorders
Fisher, Z., Galloghly, E., Boglo, E., Gracey, F., & Kemp, A. H. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819641-0.00013-x · Cited by 20
Genova, H. M., Genualdi, A., Goverover, Y., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Marino, C., & Lengenfelder, J. (2017) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1173584 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- MARSH, N. V., KERSEL, D. A., HAVILL, J. H., & SLEIGH, J. W.
- Venue
- Brain Injury
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1045-1059
- ISSN
- 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-301X
- OpenAlex
- W1972326895
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.