The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phonological development: a normative study of British English‐speaking children
Abstract
This paper reports a normative study on the phonological development of British English-speaking children. Speech samples of 684 children, aged between 3;0 and 6;11 years, randomly selected from nurseries and schools in eight different areas throughout the UK, were collected and analysed to obtain normative data. This paper reports on two aspects of speech development: the age of acquisition of sounds (phonetic acquisition) and the age that error patterns were suppressed (phonemic acquisition). It discusses the effects of age, gender and socio-economic status on speech sound development. The study found that older children had more accurate production and fewer error patterns in their speech. It found no gender differences in the younger age groups. However, in the oldest age group, it found the phonological accuracy measures of girls' better than boys. It found no significant effects of socio-economic status on any of the phonological accuracy measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The psychology of sex differences
(1975) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(75)80031-1 · Cited by 5,488
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,173
Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities
Halpern, D. F. (2000) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410605290 · Cited by 1,970
Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53 · Cited by 1,405
The Psychology of Sex Differences: —Vol. I: Text
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974) · doi:10.1515/9781503620780 · Cited by 1,368
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
(2014) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/issn.0022-4685 · Cited by 902
Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children
Bishop, D. (1997) · Cited by 748
Phonological Disability in Children
Ingram, D. (1976) · Cited by 686
The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study
Braine, M. D. S., & Smith, N. V. (1976) · Language · doi:10.2307/412573 · Cited by 641
The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska Replication
Smit, A. B., Hand, L., Freilinger, J. J., Bernthal, J. E., & Bird, A. (1990) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.5504.779 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Wren, Y., Miller, L. L., Peters, T. J., Emond, A., & Roulstone, S. (2016) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-14-0282 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- DODD, B., HOLM, A., HUA, Z., & CROSBIE, S.
- Venue
- Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 617-643
- ISSN
- 0269-9206 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5076
- OpenAlex
- W2004816326
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phonological development: a normative study of British English‐speaking children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0269920031000111348
- The paper
- DODD, B., HOLM, A., HUA, Z., & CROSBIE, S. (2003). Phonological development: a normative study of British English‐speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000111348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.