The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A meta‐analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation
Open accessAbstract
The present review syntheses 64 investigations on the determinants of helping and aggression involving more than 12,000 subjects, providing empirical tests of Weiner's (1986, 1995) theory of social conduct. A meta‐analytic test of the proposed causal cognition‐emotion‐behaviour sequence reveals that judgements of responsibility determine the emotional reactions of anger and sympathy, and that these emotional reactions, in turn, directly influence help giving and aggression. Results are highly consistent across several potential moderator variables including type of culture, sample characteristics, publication year, and publication status. Moreover, the present analyses suggest that the hypothesised model holds true for real events as well as for simulated data. Exploratory comparisons between the helping versus the aggression domain suggest that comparable results are obtained for these two domains, except that perceptions of responsibility are more likely to exert an additional proximal role in aggressive retaliation as compared to help giving. The implications of these findings for a general theory of motivation in the interpersonal and the intrapersonal domains are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018807 · Cited by 2,200
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159 · Cited by 1,514
Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature
Sinclair, S., Norris, J. M., McConnell, S. J., Chochinov, H. M., Hack, T. F., Hagen, N. A., McClement, S., & Bouchal, S. R. (2016) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0080-0 · Cited by 507
An attributional theory of motivation
Graham, S. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101861 · Cited by 341
Ethnicity, expressed emotion, attributions, and course of schizophrenia: family warmth matters
López, S. R., Nelson Hipke, K., Polo, A. J., Jenkins, J. H., Karno, M., Vaughn, C., & Snyder, K. S. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.113.3.428 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudolph, U., Roesch, S., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B.
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 815-848
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2160922356
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699930341000248
- The paper
- Rudolph, U., Roesch, S., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). A meta‐analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition & Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.