Cited by 94Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeception detection and forensic psychology

Mental state decoding in past major depression: effect of sad versus happy mood induction

Harkness, Kate L., Jacobson, Jill A., Duong, David, Sabbagh, Mark A.·2010·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

Individuals with mild depression show an enhanced ability to read or “decode” others' mental states. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether this pattern of performance is related specifically to the pathology of depression or whether it is simply a feature of the transient dysphoric state. Forty-one undergraduates with a previous episode of major depression and 52 undergraduates with no depression history participated in a mental state decoding task following a sad versus happy mood induction. Previously depressed participants were significantly more accurate in their mental state judgements than were the never-depressed participants, suggesting that enhanced mental state decoding may be a specific feature of depression in remission. Furthermore, previously depressed participants whose positive mood increased in response to the happy mood induction showed a poorer level of performance on the task, similar to that observed in the never-depressed group. Thus, a happy mood may have induced a somewhat less accurate, but perhaps more adaptive, approach to processing social information. These findings were robust after controlling for current level of depression and anxiety symptoms, intensity of response to the mood induction, response times, and performance on a control task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699930902750249

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harkness, K. L., Jacobson, J. A., Duong, D., & Sabbagh, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Harkness, Kate L.
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2010-04
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
497-513
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2100925578
Cited by
94
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
mental state decoding, theory of mind, major depressive disorder, mood induction, sad mood, happy mood, depression remission, social cognition, emotion regulation, social information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review