Cited by 132Memory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neurobiological correlates of cognitions in fear and anxiety: A cognitive-neurobiological information processing model

Open access
Hofmann, Stefan G., Ellard, Kristen K., Siegle, Greg J.·2012·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

We review likely neurobiological substrates of cognitions related to fear and anxiety. Cognitive processes are linked to abnormal early activity reflecting hypervigilance in subcortical networks involving the amygdala, hippocampus, and insular cortex, and later recruitment of cortical regulatory resources, including activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex to implement avoidant response strategies. Based on this evidence, we present a cognitive-neurobiological information-processing model of fear and anxiety, linking distinct brain structures to specific stages of information processing of perceived threat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2011.579414

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early processing biases toward threat are followed by reduced threat processing or increased avoidant responding.

    “early processing biases towards threat are followed by reduced processing of threat or increased avoidant responding”

    From United we stand: emphasizing commonalities across cognitive-behavioral therapies. (2013) · cites this paper as Hofmann, Ellard, & Siegle, 2011

  • Patients differ in their responses to treatment, presumably due to individual variability in psychological, biological, cultural, and psycho-physiological factors that shape adaptive and maladaptive anxiety responses to life experiences.

    “The conceptual framework for this study is founded on the observation that patients differ in their responses to treatment, presumably due to individual variability in the psychological, biological, cultural, and psycho-physiological factors that shape adaptive and maladaptive anxiety responses to life experiences [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 155 · Cited by 132

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Barlow DH Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic 2002 2nd Edition New York Guilford Press
  2. Beck AT Cogntive therapy and the emotional disorders 1991 New York Penguin
  3. Clark DM Wells A Heimberg RG Liebowitz MR Hope DA Schneier FR A cognitive model of social phobia Social Phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment 1995 New York Guilford Press 69 93
  4. Murphy N Brown WS Did my neurons make me do it? Philosophical and neurobiological perspectives on moral responsibility and free well 2007 New York, NY Oxford University Press
  5. Rolls ET The brain and emotion 1999 Oxford, England Oxford University Press

Authors
Hofmann, S. G., Ellard, K. K., & Siegle, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Stefan G.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2011-08
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
282-299
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W1988229848
Cited by
132
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH082998, K02MH082998, MH078308., MH-081116, F31MH084422, P50MH080215, R01MH078308, R01MH081116)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
fear, anxiety, threat perception, cognitive processes, amygdala, hippocampus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, hypervigilance, avoidance, information processing model, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Fear, Hippocampus, Humans, Models, Psychological, Neural Pathways, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review